Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  855 / 1345 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 855 / 1345 Next Page
Page Background

HR-CTV

MRI TRUS-CT Mean

difference of

MRI-CT

Pearson

correlation

coefficient (r)

P-value

Level 1

(Point A)

Mean (

±

SD)

Width

3.4 (

±

1.0) 3.9 (

±

0.9) 0.1 (

±

0.0)

0.75

0.000*

Thickness 3.1 (

±

1.0) 3.0 (

±

0.7) 0.2 (

±

0.6)

0.80

0.000*

Level 2

Mean (

±

SD)

Width

3.7(

±

1.0) 4.0 (

±

0.8) -0.5 (

±

0.6)

0.69

0.000*

Thickness

3.2 (

±

1.0) 3.1 (

±

0.7) 0.2 (

±

0.6)

0.70

0.000*

Level 3

Mean (

±

SD)

Width

3.8 (

±

0.8) 4.1 (

±

0.7) -0.3 (

±

0.5)

0.80

0.000*

Thickness 3.3 (

±

0.7) 3.1 (

±

0.8) -0.4 (

±

0.7)

0.73

0.000*

TRUS assisted HRCTV delineation on CT images

Correlation was good when para disease defined at BT

With Para Invasion: Overestimation of width on CT

Dosimetric Impact: Ongoing