![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0107.png)
107
for Water Services from Forests” Washington D.C., Forest Trends, Wash-
ington DC, 37.
Pimentel
et al
. 2001. Economic and environmental threats of alien plant,
animal and microbe invasions. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
84 (1): 1-20.
Pimentel
et al
. 2005. Update on the environmental and economic costs
associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecological Eco-
nomics 52 (3): 273-288.
Pimentel, D. (ed.) 2002. Biological Invasions: Economic and Environ-
mental Costs of Alien Plant, Animal, and Microbe Species. CRC Press,
Boca Raton, Florida.
Pitman, A.J.,
et al
. 2004. Impact of land cover change on climate of south-
west Western Australia. Journal of Geophysical Research 109: D18109
Poffenberger, N., 2006. People in the forest: community forestry ex-
periences from Southeast Asia. International Journal Environment and
Sustainable Development, Vol. 5, No. 1, pg. 57. Available at:
http://www.
communityforestryinternational.org/publications/articles/People_in_the_
Forest.pdf [Accessed 10/05/10].
Rabalais, N.N.
et al
. 1999. Hypoxia in the northern Gulf of Mexico: Link-
ages with the Mississippi River, p 297-322 in: Kumpf, H., Steidinger, K. and
Sherman, K. (eds), The Gulf of Mexico Large Marine Ecosystem – Assess-
ment, Sustainability and Management. Blackwell Science, U.S.
Reid, P.C.
et al
. 2009. Impacts of the Oceans on Climate Change. In: D.
W. Sims (ed) Advances in Marine Biology, Vol. 56, Burlington: Academic
Press. 150 pp.
Romero J,
et al
. 1994. The belowground organs of the Mediterranean sea-
grass Posidonia oceanica as a biogeochemical sink. Aquatic Botany 47: 13-19.
Sala
et al
. 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science
287 (5459): 1770-1774.
Sandhu, H. S.,
et al
., 2010. Organic agriculture and ecosystem services.
Environmental science and policy 13: 1-7.
Sayer, J.
et al
. 2004. The restoration of forest biodiversity and ecological
values. Forest Ecology and Management 201 (2004) 3–11.
Sayer, J.,
et al
. 2003. Forest landscape restoration: the role of forest resto-
ration in achieving multifunctional landscapes. FAO. Rome.
Schröter, D.
et al
. 2005. Ecosystem service supply and vulnerability to
global change in Europe. Science 310: 1333-1337
Seitzinger, S. and Lee, R. 2008. Land-based sources of nutrients to Large
Marine Ecosystems. P. 81- 97, in Sherman, K. and Hempel, G. (Eds). The
UNEP Large Marine Ecosystem Report: A perspective on changing condi-
tions in LMEs of the world’s Regional Seas. UNEP Regional Seas Report and
Studies No. 182. United Nations Environment Programme. Nairobi, Kenya
Sherman, K. and Hempel, G. 2008. Perspectives on Regional Seas and
the Large Marine Ecosystem Approach. P. 3- 21 in Sherman, K. and Hem-
pel, G. (Eds), The UNEP Large Marine Ecosystem Report: A perspective
on changing conditions in LMEs of the world’s Regional Seas. UNEP Re-
gional Seas Report and Studies No. 182. United Nations Environment Pro-
gramme. Nairobi, Kenya.
Sibley, P.,
et al
. 2007. Translocating the white-clawed crayfish Austropota-
mobius pallipes. In: Hickley, P. and Axford, S. (eds.), Fisheries & Conserva-
tion Successes & Failures, Institute of Fisheries Management Conference
Proceedings, 42–51.
Simenstad, S.
et al
. 2006. When is restoration not? Incorporating land-
scape-scale processes to restore self-sustaining ecosystems in coastal wet-
land restoration. Ecological Engineering 26, 27-39.
Smith, L.
et al
. 2010. Effectiveness of eriophyid mites for biological con-
trol of weedy plants and challenges for future research. Experimental and
applied ecology 51: 115-149
Society for Ecological Restoration International (SER) Science & Policy
Working Group. 2005. Guidelines for Developing and Managing Ecologi-
cal Restoration Projects, 2nd Edition.
www.ser.org& Tucson: Society for
Ecological Restoration International.
Society for Ecological Restoration International (SER) Science and Policy
Working Group. 2004. The SER International Primer on Ecological Res-
toration.
www.ser.org& Tucson: Society for Ecological Restoration Inter-
national.
Society for Ecological Restoration International (SER) Science and Policy
Working Group. 2007. Ecological Restoration as a Tool for Mitigating and
Adapting to Climate Change. Policy Position Statement,
www.ser.org&
Tucson: Society for Ecological Restoration International.
Society for Ecological Restoration International (SER) Science and Policy
Working Group. 2010. CBD Information Note for SBSTTA 14,
www.ser.org& Tucson: Society for Ecological Restoration International.
Society for Ecological Restoration International 2009. Case study – In-
donesia: Central Kalimantan Peatlands Restoration Project.
http://www.
globalrestorationnetwork.org/database/case-study/?id=252.
Retrieved
7/05/2010.
Söderhäll, K. & Cerenius, L. 1999. The crayfish plague fungus: History
and recent advances. Freshwater Crayfish 12: 11-35.
Sodhi, N. S.
et al
. 2010. Local people value environmental services pro-
vided by forested parks. Biodiversity and conservation 19: 1175-1188
Sommerkorn, M., Hassol, S.J. 2009. Arctic Climate Feedbacks: Global
Implications. WWF International Arctic Programme, Oslo.
Song
et al
. 2008. Different responses of invasive and native species to
elevated CO2 concentration. Acta Oecolo 35 (1): 128-135.
Stehfest, E.
Et al
. 2009. Climate benefits of changing diet. Climatic
Change 95:83–102
Su, Y. Z.,
et al
. 2005. Influences of continuous grazing on soil properties
in a degraded sandy grassland, Inner Mongolia, Northern China. Catena
59: 267-278