Background Image
Previous Page  21 / 112 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 21 / 112 Next Page
Page Background

21

The services humankind receives from complex ecosystems

include regulation of water supplies and water quality, main-

tenance of soil fertility, carbon sequestration, climate change

mitigation and enhanced food security, to mention a few. Pro-

vision of these services is dependent upon the functioning of

ecosystems, which is characterized by complex interactions

between organisms and their biological and chemical environ-

ments. The environmental degradation that has occurred in

many parts of the world has a negative impact on such func-

tioning, and can reduce the provision of services on which hu-

man livelihoods depend.

Ecological restoration is increasingly being used to reverse

the environmental degradation caused by human activities.

One of the key objectives of such restoration is to improve the

functioning of degraded ecosystems, to increase both biodi-

versity and the ecosystem services provided to humankind.

The conservation of biodiversity is recognised as important due to the role biodiversity

plays in underpinning many of the ecosystem services which humans depend upon

form their well-being (MA 2005). Furthermore, it is well documented globally that habi-

tat loss is a direct driver of species loss, and one mechanism to bring species diversity

back to a site is through restoration of the ecosystem or habitat (SER 2010). And while

it has been documented that restoration does not necessary achieve the same value

of biodiversity or ecosystem services found in intact ecosystems (Benayas

et al

2009),

there are many good examples of were informed ecological restoration programmes

have been able to deliver biodiversity, including the recovery of threatened species and

ecosystems (Lindenmayer

et al

. In press).

ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION

FOR BIODIVERSITY

CONSERVATION

Although ecological restoration is now being undertaken

throughout the world, evidence regarding the effectiveness of

such activities has been lacking. However, a systematic meta-

analysis of 89 restoration assessments was recently published

in the journal Science, integrating the results obtained from

restoration actions in a wide range of ecosystem types from

throughout the world. Results indicated that ecosystem res-

toration was consistently effective in improving ecosystem

services (Banayas

et al

., 2009).

From the 89 studies, 526 quantitative measures of variables re-

lating to biodiversity and ecosystem services were extracted and

incorporated into a database. The ecosystem services were clas-

sified according to the scheme developed by the Millennium

Ecosystem Assessment (MA, 2005), which distinguishes four

categories: 1) supporting (e.g., nutrient cycling and primary

production), (2) provisioning (e.g., timber, fish, food crops),