Previous Page  109 / 346 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 109 / 346 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

APRIL 1983

Gifts and Distributions to

U.K. Residents

by

Colin A. Chapman, Solicitor

A

Press Release from the U.K. Revenue, following the

recent Budget Speech of Sir Geoffrey Howe, con-

firmed that the United Kingdom Finance Act, 1981, has

important effects upon gifts and distributions to

beneficiaries resident in the United Kingdom from donors

or settlements in the Irish Republic — in addition to the

Exchange Control and other difficulties which already

beset an Irish benefactor.

The value at which a U.K. resident beneficiary

may acquire an asset from a non-resident donor

or trust.

Section 90 of that Act introduced new anti-avoidance

provisions which have material consequences for U.K.

resident beneficiaries from an Irish donor or trust. The

section was introduced to counter certain tax avoidance

schemes (Reverse

Harrison v. Nairn Williamson

Ltd.,

[1978] STC 67) but introduces what appears to be unfair

treatment where a disposal is made by a non-U.K. resident

person or trust in favour of a U.K. resident.

Normally, the acquisition cost of an asset is deemed to

be the market value of the asset at date of acquisition. Now,

however, where a U.K. resident acquires an asset from an

"excluded person", the market value rule no longer

applies.

An "excluded person" is defined to mean:—

(a) a person neither resident nor ordinarily resident in

U.K.;

(b) a person exempt from U . K. C.G.T.;

(c) a Charity or Friendly Society;

(d) a person making a disposal for purposes of:—

(i) an approved pension scheme which is exempt

from U . K. C.G.T.;

(ii) superannuation funds for employees outside the

U . K.

The effect of this is that the U .K. resident beneficiary

who receives a gift or a distribution from an Irish or other

non -U .K. resident donor or trust receives the asset

distributed at a "nil" value for U .K. Capital Gains Tax

and, on a subsequent disposal of that asset, will be

chargeable to U . K. Capital Gains Tax on the total value

realised from such disposal. (Indexation does not help, as a

multiple of nothing is still nothing!).

Examples

1. An Irish resident and domiciled person makes a gift of

shares with a market value of, say, IR£30,000 (having

ob t a i n ed t he appropriate Ex c hange

Control

permission) to a U.K.resident. The acquisition cost of

the U . K. resident will be N I L and, therefore, on a

disposal of the shares by him, the entire net proceeds

will represent a chargeable gain.

2. Marketable securities valued at, say, £100,000 are held

by Irish trustees upon trust for A for life, with

remainder to B. B is now resident in England. On the

death of A, if the trustees distribute the marketable

securities to B

in specie,

B will receive the investments

at a N I L base value for U .K. Capital Gains Tax

purposes and, on subsequent disposal, will be

chargeable to U.K. Capital Gains Tax on the full

proceeds.

A distribution of Sterling cash from an Irish trust would

not, however, give rise to this problem and consequently

the trustees, in such circumstances, should convert the

assets for distribution to the U .K. resident into Sterling

(having obtained all appropriate Exchange Control

approvals) prior to distribution.

This anti-avoidance section does not capture an

inheritance by a U.K. resident beneficiary from the free

estate of a non-U.K. resident and non-U.K. domiciled

testator or intestate as, in such case, the deceased is deemed

to have disposed of the asset on death at its market value to

his personal representatives, whose acquisition is treated

as the acquisition of the beneficiaries (Sec. 49, U .K.

C.G.T. Act 1979).

Liability for U.K. Capital Gains Tax on capital

payments from non-resident trusts.

Section 80 of the same U.K. Finance Act (1981) also

changed the rules for the allocation of gains made by non-

resident trusts which may be attributed to U . K. resident

beneficiaries.

Prior to 5th April 1981, U .K. legislation was capable of

imputing to potential trust beneficiaries resident in the

U.K. the gains of overseas trusts of which they were

potential beneficiaries. Surprisingly, Section 80 of the

U.K. Finance Act, 1981, which modified this legislation,

offers some opportunity for deferral of U.K. Capital Gains

Tax in such circumstances. However, it does impose upon

non-resident trustees the necessity for keeping proper

records, in a form suitable for U .K. tax purposes.

The general scheme of the new rules is to attribute gains

of non-resident trustees to beneficiaries who actually

receive capital payments from such trustees.

If a settlor was domiciled in the U .K. at the time a settle-

ment was made, or if he was so domiciled at the time a gain

was made, then from and after 6th April, 1981, the gains

of the settlement in each year are computed as if the

trustees were resident or ordinarily resident in the U.K.,

but only attributed to a beneficiary when a distribution is

made. Those gains, together with gains brought forward

from earlier years (but excluding the annual exemption for

trustees) which have not already been attributed to a

101