Previous Page  19 / 346 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 19 / 346 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

JANUARY/FEBRUARY 1983

Annual General Meeting of

the Society, Blackhall Place,

Dublin 7. Friday, 12

November, 1982

The President, Mr. W. Brendan Allen, took the

Chair. At the outset he welcomed Mr. David

Edwards, Mr. Michael Park, Professor Philip Love,

Past Presidents, Mr. Patrick Riddell, Senior Deputy

Secretary, and Mrs. Caroline Slator, Education

Officer, of the Law Society of Scotland. He also

welcomed the members of the Society to the meeting.

Notice

The adoption of the notice convening the meeting

was proposed by Mrs. M. Quinlan, seconded by Mr.

W. Beatty and agreed. The attendance at the meeting

was recorded in the Attendance Book. 46 Members

attended.

Minutes

On the proposition of Mr. P.C. Moore seconded

by Mr. J. Carrigan, the minutes of the Half Yearly

General Meeting held in Ashford Castle Cong,

County Mayo, on 7 May 1982, were taken as read and

signed by the President.

Scruitineers' Report

The Scrutineers' Report was adopted on the

proposition of Mr. D. Moran seconded by Mr. E.

Margetson. The result of the Council Election was as

follows:—

27. Glynn, Patrick A.

676

28. McCague, Eugene

669

29. Reidy, John C.

642

30. Donnelly, Andrew J.O.

620

The following other candidates received the

number of votes placed after their names:—

1. Lynch, John R.

598

2. Breen, Maeve T.

587

3. Malone, Paul L.

587

4. O'Neill, Raymond St. John

537

5. Hooper, John

482

6. Brunker, Eric

446

7. O'Doherty, Patrick Hugh

425

8. Griffin, Gerard F.

380

9. Horgan, Anne Moore

240

10. Murphy, Anthony

141

Provincial Delegates — Returned unopposed:

Connaught: Patrick J. McEllin, Claremorris,

Co. Mayo.

Leinster:

Michael J. Hogan, 21 Patrick Street,

Kilkenny.

Munster:

Joseph Dundon, 101 O'Connell Street,

Limerick.

Ulster:

Peter F.R. Murphy, Ballybofey, Co.

Donegal.

Council Report for the Year 1981/1982

The President referred to the Council Report as

circulated to the members and invited comment.

The report was discussed under the following

headings:—

Candidates — Elected

Total Votes

1. Quinlan, Moya

1,106

2. Buckley, John F.

1,024

3. Allen, W. Brendan

934

4. Ensor, Anthony H.

904

5. Shaw, Thomas D.

897

6. Binchy, Donal G.

894

7. O'Mahony, Michael V.

881

8. O'Donnell, Roderick (Rory) D.

860

9. Bourke, Adrian Patrick

809

10. O'Donnell, Patrick Frank

802

11. Collins, Anthony E.

787

12. O'Connor, Patrick

787

13. Daly, Francis D.

779

14. Beatty, Walter

768

15. Margetson, Ernest J.

763

16. Curran, Maurice R.

760

17. Smyth, Andrew F.

753

18. Shields, Laurence K.

720

19. Cusack Connellan, Clare

719

20. Kelliher, Donal

714

21. Cullen, Laurence

705

22. Monahan, Raymond T.

705

23. O'Hagan, Donal P.

701

24. Pigot, David R.

699

25. Killeen, Carmel S.

697

26. Blake, Bruce St. John

694

Compensation Fund

Mr. L. Mellon referred to an unfortunate situation

which had arisen in the case of a particular solicitor.

The man concerned had been approved by the

relevant Committee of the Society for a limited

practising certificate but it would not be issued until

he got a job and he could not get a job because he had

no certificate. It was wrong that such a catch 22

situation should exist. Further, when, an application

to the President of the High Court, the President in

1980 ordered that he be issued with a full practising

cetificate, his name did not appear in the Society's

Law Directory in the following year. More

unfortunate still the solicitor's accounts were frozen

in 1973 and unfrozen in 1975, but at that stage in 1975

the banks were not told of the action taken and

subsequently continued to act as if his accounts were

frozen. In his view, it was wrong that such a situation

should have arisen. In another situation Mr. Mellon

said that he was acting for an accountant who was

regarded by the Society as having issued an incorrect

certificate. He reported a deficit of £40,000, whereas

the Law Society on inquiry in the Solicitor's Office,

contended that the deficit should have been

£175,000. The difference was in executors'

accounts which the auditor could not check as they

11