Previous Page  309 / 324 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 309 / 324 Next Page
Page Background

Section 4 of the Solicitors (Ireland) Act, 1849 to

direct executors' costs to be taxed on the requisition

of the beneficiary even after payment of the costs.

In re Carthew (27 Ch.D. 485) it was held that where

a bill has been paid by trustees and executors out

of the estate the residuary legatee is entitled to have a

copy of the bill delivered on payment of the costs of

it, and the bill was ordered to be taxed although

there was not such pressure or allegation and proof

of overcharge as are usually relied on in applications

after payment. See also re Blackmore (i 3 Beav. 154)

and the references in Henry on Solicitors' Re

muneration, Vol. i, pages 45-49.

Solicitor practising as accountant

A MEMBER asked for a ruling from the Council

whether there is any objection to a solicitor's

.qualifying and practising as an accountant. Member

'wished to study for the examinations held by one

of the accountancy bodies. Several questions arose

viz.,

(a)

merely obtaining the accountant's qualification,

(£) practising as an accountant separately,

(i)

practising as an accountant in conjunction

with his practice as a solicitor.

On a report from a Committee the Council stated

that:—

(a)

there is no objection to member's obtaining

the accountant's qualification.

(b)

there is no objection to member's practising

separately as an accountant.

(c)

member should not practise both as a solicitor

and an accountant.

Client's privilege against disclosure

A MEMBER acted for the purchaser of a building plot

for £115. The contract provided that the purchaser

should pay the vendor's costs. On completion of the

matter he paid the sum of £20 to member. Member

paid the vendor's costs £10 195. 9d., and retained

£9 os. 3d. for himself. Litigation has now taken

place between the purchaser and another party.

Member is no longer acting but he has been in

formed by one of the solicitors acting in the matter

that the purchaser (his former client) has stated in a

letter that he paid £61 in legal costs to member.

In effect this, if true, would mean that he paid

£53 os. 3d. costs for the purchase of a plot for £115.

Member expects to receive a subpoena to attend the

hearing and wishes to know whether his evidence

with respect to the costs would be privileged and

whether he could disclose it without his former

client's consent. On a report from a Committee the

Council stated that member should attend Court in

compliance with the subpoena with his files and

records.

If the letter mentioned is put to him in

evidence he is entitled to say that he is willing to

state the amount which he received for costs but as

the matter was a solicitor and client transaction he

cannot answer without the client's consent unless

directed by the Court.

The privilege between a

solicitor and client communication belongs to the

client. The solicitor cannot disclose any information

unless the client waives the privilege or unless the

Court directs. The privilege continues even after

the retainer has ended.

Conflicting interests

ABOUT ten months ago member obtained a decree

for a sum of money for X against Y. The decree is

still unsatisfied. About one month ago member

received tentative instructions from Y to proceed

against Z for money due and owing by Z to Y.

He has not received final instructions. Within the

past month member was again approached by X

who informed him that he wished to be appointed

receiver over a sum which he knew Z owed to Y.

This is the debt for which Y instructed member to

sue Z. Member enquired whether he may apply to

have X appointed as a receiver over this sum without

using any information obtained from Y.

On a

report from a Committee the Council stated that in

their opinion member should not act in the matter

for any of the parties.

Retirement Benefits.

Income tax on con

tributions by solicitors

THE Council heard a report from a deputation which

was received by the Minister for Finance.

The

deputation included a member of the Institute of

Chartered Accountants and dealt with the memoran

dum submitted last year on behalf of the General

Council of the Bar, the Accountancy bodies and

the Society, The deputation stated that they had

stressed the case for the allowance of contributions

by self-employed persons towards retirement bene

fits as a deduction for income tax purposes. They

stated that the Minister appeared to be sympathetic

to the representations made but of course could not

give any indication in advance of the contents of

the next budget.

The Border

THE Council on a report from a Committee decided

to make representations to The Incorporated Law

Society of Northern Ireland with a view to the making

of regulations by the respective Societies which

would prevent a solicitor in either area acting in

connection with sales by public auction in a place

which is not covered by a practising certificate.