THE DUTY OF A LAWYER.
You,
the members of an ancient and noble
profession, have a mission in the world to-day.
You have an immense social dignity, with all the'
time-honoured rights of your craft, but remember
that these rights are based on your duties of social
service. Law has been admirably defined in terms
of justice as:
Ars boni et aequi.
You are the wardens
of the law and of social justice, hence the indis–
pensable social service you must render is to see
that the citizen gets that good and just thing. By
your very calling you are the trusted friends of
natural equity, hence enemies of inequity.
You
are not the legislature, true, but as lovers of the law,
as men expert in your craft, do not fail to inform
the common conscience and the legislature, whether
any proposed legisktion is or is not against natural
justice or equity. Degradation must surely over–
whelm a people whose jurists are so careless about
natural equity, that nothing is beyond the powers
of the legislature, provided legal formalities are
observed.
So much, then, must the
bonum et aequum
be the
aim of the legal profession that for no consideration
must either the judge sell his judgment or the
advocate sell his advocacy to what does hurt to an
individual or the community. If the advocate knows
with certainty that a cause is untrue in itself and
hurtful either to an individual or the community,
his counsel and pleading for that cause would be
a direct cooperation with evil. Moreover, as he
cannot knowingly defend such an unjust cause
even with facts that are true, so neither can he
defend even a just cause with allegations that are
untrue. No advocate can lie even to defend justice
or truth.
Yet it is still the tradition of the legal profession
that these real services shall be recompensed not
by any measure of wealth which the man of law
may demand, but by such reward simply as will
enable him to live the honoured life of advocate
or judge.
" Honour," says Adam Smith, " is a
great part of
the
reward of all honourable
employments."
To sum up, I believe the Legal profession may
help to save the State by a new affirmation of its
old ideals, and by a strict adhesion to those two
principles which are among its noblest traditions :
First, Social Status based on Social Service;
and, second, Reward based on Social Status.
Rev. Vincent McNabb, O.P.
(Quoted in the sermon delivered at the opening
of the Legal year
in St. Patrick's Cathedral,
Melbourne, Australia, and reprinted in
Scottish 'Law
Gazette,
March 1953.
See also
Irish Law Times,
1941, p. 242.)
FINANCE
ACT, 1955.
'
THE attention of members is drawn to Section 17
of the Finance Act, 1955, which relates to credit
sales agreements under
tne Hire-Purchase Act,
1946.
Such agreements if made under hand are
liable to 6d. stamp duty under Section 22 of the
Stamp Act, 1891.
If under seal, such agreements
are liable to a stamp duty of io/- as being a Deed
of any kind whatsoever, nat described in the
Schedule under the Stamp Act, 1891.
RECENT
LEGAL
LITERATURE.
Action by Administrator in Q.B.D.
(L.T.,
i and 8
July, I955)-
Accelerating Trusts in Remainder (" Re Cochrane's
Settlement")
(L.T., 4
March, 1955).
American Anti-Trust Laws
(Turner)
(M.L.E..,
May, 1955).
Ancient Lights
(I.L.T., 6
July, 195 5).
Alternative Accommodation : Security of Tenure :
"Scrace
v.
Windust "
(S.J.,
14 May, 1955).
Assents in favour of oneself: " Harvell
v.
Foster"
(The Solicitor,
July, 1955).
Assignment of part of debt Assignor's rights :
"Walter
v.
Murphy"
(S.J.,
30 April, 1955).
Attempt to stop up London Highway
(S.J.,
9 April,
Bail Refused Likelihood of Further Offences
("People
v.
McCann " Haugh J.)
(I.L.T.,
4june, 1955.)
Bankruptcy in Private International Law Pt. II
(Blom Cooper) (International & Compar.
L.Q.,
April, 1955).
Bar General Council :
Annual Statement
(S.J.,
25 June, 1955).
" Beyond reasonable doubt."
" R.
v.
Blackburn,"
and " R.
v.
Murtagh "
(L.T.,
24 June, 1955).
Bonn and Paris Agreements
(L.T.,
18 February,
J 955)-
Boundaries :
" Hopgood
v.
Brown " (C.A.)
(L.T.,
i April, 1955).
Burden of Proof under Road Traffic Act :
" John
v.
Humphrey "
(The Solicitor,
July, 195 5).
Chancery Masters Extended
Jurisdiction
(S.J.,
9 April, 1955).
Charitable Trusts Public Element
(L.T.,
2 July,
Colonial Courts and
the Doctrine of Judicial
Precedent (Elias)
(M.L.R.,
July, 1955).
Company Law :
" Holdsworth
v.
Caddies " and
" Welch
v.
Bank of England "
(S.J.,
14 May, 195 5).
Conditional and absolute discharge Powers of
magistrates
(S.J.,
9 July, 1955).
...