Summary
• Modern intracavitary applicators
• Same concept as historical systems; main differences:
• CT, MRI compatibility, materials
• Fixed, adjustable components
• Smaller channel diameters
• I
ntracavitary technique alone:
• limited possibility for 3 D adaptation
• Emerging technologies:
• Intracavitary/interstitial techniques
• Comprehensive applicator IC/IS (Vienna II type)
• 3D printing
Historical
Paris
Stockholm
Manchester
Fletcher
Modern
Stockholm
Manchester
& Fletcher
Mould
Limitations of
IC Applicators
Emerging
Technologies