GAZETTE
DECEMBER 1988
of the Incorporated Law
Society of Ireland on the 1989 Budget
The following is the text of the Law Society's submission on the 1989 Budget
prepared by the Taxation
Committee.
1. Simplification of the Tax
System
The greatest advantage a tax
system can have is its simplicity
and its simplicity is the greatest
encouragement to compliance. In
general everything possible should
be done to simplify the Tax Code
w i t h a v i ew to boos t i ng the
Revenue yield and at the same time
to enhance economic activity. A
(b)
particular emphasis should be
placed on compliance w i th a view
to minimising compliance costs,
both for the Revenue and for the
taxpayer.
(c)
2. C.A.T.
The current high level of the top
rates yields very little tax while at
the same time those high rates
serve to make the country un-
attractive to capital, both domestic
(d)
and foreign. The psychological
negative impact of the current top
rates is far out of proportion to the
yield from those rates.
Because of the level of U.K.
taxation, currently the max imum
rate is 4 0%, it is essential that this
country takes measures to improve
its position. Ideally, our top rates
should be below the British rate
(e)
w i t h a view to making this country
attractive to free floating capital
f r om such locations as South
Africa and Hong Kong.
Consequently, it is submitted and
recommended that the flat rate be
3 5% w i th more generous personal
allowances. This recommendation
would leave most normal estates in
the country unaffected to a large
extent insofar as their payments to
the Revenue are concerned.
In addition to the reduction in
rate to 35%, it is submitted that the
f o l l ow i ng specific changes be
considered w i th a view to relieving
hardship and, in some areas, for the
sake of consistency,
(a) At present, there is no time
limit put on the period over
(f)
w h i c h a g g r e g a t i on t a k es
place. This puts a heavy
burden on the Revenue and
the taxpayer as full records
must be kept,
ad
infinitum,
e i t her
ma n u a l ly
or
on
computer. Neither method is
suitable for keeping records
over an indefinite period. It is
submi t t ed t hat an aggre-
gation period of seven years
would be sufficient for this
tax.
It is submi t t ed that gifts
between spouses should be
exempt from Gift Tax. This
(g)
would make the tax con-
sistent as it affects spouses.
It is submitted that, in the
interest of Equity, thresholds
be index linked and the new
t h r e s ho l ds be a n n o u n c ed
each Budget Day by the
Minister for Finance. This is
the position in the U.K.
The small gift exemption of
£ 5 0 0 has r ema i n ed un-
changed since 1978. It is
submitted that this exemption
be increased to £1,000 and be
applied to inheritances, as
we l l. Th is w o u l d relieve
Personal Re p r e s e n t a t i v es
f r om
ma k i ng
i n - d e p th
enquiries into trivial cases.
Nephews and nieces are
given favourable treatment in
certain circumstances under
t he p r o v i s i ons of Par. 9,
Second Schedule - First Part
of the Capital Acquisitions Tax
Act, 1976. In the circum-
stances set out there, they
will be treated as children for
tax purposes. Grandchildren
are of closer relationship, both
in terms of blood and in terms
of affection and are likely to
be working in the circum-
stances set out in that Para-
graph. It is submitted that
grandchildren be given the
same favourable treatment as
the nephew or niece in the
same circumstances.
Agricultural property is rightly
given special treatment in
Sect. 19 of the Act wh i ch
relieves the burden of tax on
s u ch p r ope r t y. Non - ag r i-
cultural business is not so
relieved although an employer
in t hat t y pe of business
p r o b a b ly emp l o ys
mo re
people than the farmer. Such
business could be run, either
personally or t h r ough the
medium of a company. It is
submitted that non-agricultural
business be given the same
relief as Agricultural Property.
A basic principle of taxation is
that it should be fair. In the
Act, the Oireachtas accepted
that acquisitions from close
family members would be
given more relief than acquisi-
t i o ns f r om mo re d i s t a nt
relationships.
O t h er
ma t t e rs
w h i c h
should be taken into account
are:
(i) the degree of hardship
inflicted by the tax;
(ii) that the individuals and
their families be encour-
aged to support them-
selves out of their own
resources, where poss-
ible, and the State should
not deprive individuals
of assets given or saved
t o p r o v i de
s u p p o rt
during decrepitude or
old age, particularly if
the effect is to make
such person a candidate
for State assistance
This type of hardship can take
a number of forms:
(i) Frequently a house is
shared by t wo or more
s i ng le
or
w i d o w ed
relatives and there is a
relationship of mutual
dependence going back
many years. In most
cases there is no other
wealth other than the
house. The succession
of one (or more) of t hem
to the house can cause
severe financial hardship
and force the survivor(s)
to sell the house.
337