Previous Page  15 / 24 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 15 / 24 Next Page
Page Background

outcomes. Neuropathy evaluations included

the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument

(MNSI) questionnaire completed at baseline in

5145 participants (ILI n = 2570, DSE n = 2575) and

repeated annually thereafter and the MNSI phys-

ical examination and light touch sensation testing

conducted in 3775 participants (ILI n = 1905, DSE

n = 1870) 1–2.3 years after discontinuation of the

intervention.

RESULTS

At baseline, the MNSI questionnaire

scores were 1.9 ± 0.04 and 1.8 ± 0.04 in the ILI

and DSE groups, respectively (difference not

statistically significant). After 1 year, when weight

loss was maximal in the ILI group (8.6 ± 6.9%)

compared with DSE (0.7 ± 4.8%), the respec-

tive MNSI scores were 1.7 ± 0.04 and 2.0 ± 0.04

(p ≤ 0.001). Subsequently, the scores increased

gradually in both groups, but remained signifi-

cantly lower in the ILI group for the first 3 years

and at the end of follow-up. In both groups,

there was a significant association between

changes in the MNSI scores and changes in

body weight, HbA1c and serum lipids. There

were no significant between-group differences

in the proportions of participants with MNSI

physical examination scores ≥2.5, considered

to be indicative of diabetic neuropathy. The light

touch sensation measured separately in either

the right or left big toes (halluces) did not differ

between ILI and DSE, but when the data were

combined for both toes, light touch was better

preserved in the ILI group.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

ILI resulted in a

significant decrease in questionnaire-based

DPN, which was associated with the magnitude

of weight loss. In both the ILI and DSE groups,

changes in the MNSI score were also related

to changes in HbA1c and lipids. There were no

significant effects of ILI on physical examination

measures of DPN conducted 1–2.3 years after

termination of the active intervention, except for

light touch sensation, which was significantly

better in the ILI group when measurements were

combined for both toes. However, a potential

limiting factor to the interpretation of the physi-

cal examination data is that no baseline studies

are available for comparison.

Effects of a long-term lifestyle modification

programme on peripheral neuropathy in over-

weight or obese adults with type 2 diabetes:

the Look AHEAD Study.

Diabetologia

2017 Mar

27;[EPub Ahead of Print], The Look AHEAD

Research Group.

are considered compatible with neuropa-

thy and scores above 4 are abnormal.

At baseline, the MNSI questionnaire scores

were 1.9 ± 0.04 and 1.8 ± 0.04 in the ILI

and DSE groups, respectively (P = NS).

After 1 year, weight loss was maximal in

the ILI group (8.6% ± 6.9%) compared with

DSE (0.7% ± 4.8%); the respective MNSI

scores were 1.7 ± 0.04 and 2.0 ± 0.04 (P ≤

0.001), indicating progression in the DSE

group. Subsequently, the scores increased

gradually in both groups, but remained sig-

nificantly lower in the ILI group for the first

3 years and at the end of follow-up. In both

groups, there was a significant associa-

tion between changes in the MNSI scores

and changes in body weight, HbA1c, and

serum lipids. There were no significant

between-group differences in the propor-

tions of participants with MNSI physical

examination scores ≥2.5, considered to be

indicative of diabetic neuropathy. The light

touch sensation measured separately in

either the right or left big toes (halluces) did

not differ between ILI and DSE, but when

the data were combined for both toes, light

touch was better preserved in the ILI group.

The authors conclude that lifestyle changes

are associatedwith loss of weight, which low-

ers the risk for questionnairebut not objective

neuropathy. The pattern of response to the

intervention is very much akin to that seen in

the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial

(DCCT) and in the DPP trial wherein there is

an initial response in the active group and

this is slowly reversed, albeit at a slower rate,

than in the conventionally treated group. This

is the Nike curve of diabetes management.

It argues for a window of opportunity when

aggressive treatment will have a maximal

effect, which wanes. However, lifestyle inter-

ventions are very difficult to sustain and may

paradoxically encourage increased caloric

intake and sedentary behavior. Patients fre-

quently adapt by reducing activity levels

when not exercising and increasing caloric

intake following exercise bouts.

Thus, while this literature supports the

premise that CSPN and DPN associ-

ated with metabolic syndrome may be

amenable to therapy, development of a

well-tolerated, sustainable, pharmacologic

approach is needed.

There are five drugs available in the United

States for long-term weight loss: orlistat,

lorcaserin, phentermine-topiramate (TPM),

naltrexone-bupropion, and liraglutide. Mean

weight loss varies from 4% to 9%, with phen-

termine-TPM generally associated with the

highest loss (8.6–9.3%), with 70% of patients

experiencing >10% weight loss. It has been

shown to improve symptoms using the Nor-

folk QOL-DN (quality of life) tool, improve

physical measures of neuropathy, and

induce regeneration of IENF. It is now being

examined in the US in a multicenter study

and no doubt will surely be a wonderful

antidote to our intrinsically slothful popula-

tion! The Holy Grail for neuropathy, which

is the major contributor to foot ulcers and

amputations, is an agent that addresses

the underlying biology of the disease, and

there are many in the wings including gene

therapy. In 1982, an editorial in

The Lancet

said, “All we can do for neuropathy is make

the diagnosis and commiserate with the

patient.” Now there is a whole lot more!

Dr Vinik is Professor of

Medicine/Pathology/

Neurobiology, and Director

of Research and

Neuroendocrine Unit at

Eastern Virginia Medical

School, Strelitz Diabetes

Center, Virginia.

MICROVASCULAR COMPLICATIONS

15

VOL. 1 • NO. 1 • 2017