Previous Page  228 / 300 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 228 / 300 Next Page
Page Background

(v)

BILLS OF COSTS:

Sometimes persons write to the Society stating that they have been

overcharged by their Solicitors. The standard form of reply is that the Society has no juris-

diction in matters relating to Solicitor's Costs which are controlled as a matter of law. However,

the Society may be prepared to express views on the correctness of a Bill of Costs on receiving

same from the Client and on hearing from the Solicitor concerned.

(vi)

THEORETICAL COMPLAINTS:

Any complaint which does not state the name and

address of the Solicitor concerned is not answered directly. The Society writes to the com-

plainant informing him that in order to properly consider the matter it is necessary to have

the name and address of the Solicitor concerned.

3.7 Up to recently every complaint to a Solicitor warranted three reminders to the Solicitor

concerned on the part of the Society. Now the Society will send one reminder only where the

matter is a serious matter or the Solicitor concerned has shown no inclination in the past to

respond to the Society's correspondent.

3.8

THE INSTITUTION OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST A SOLICITOR:

The Registrar's Committee are responsible for instituting Disciplinary proceedings against

Solicitors. The two most likely areas (apart from a Complaint) where a standard procedure

would be desirable is in relation to:

(a) Failure to submit an Accountant's Certificate;

(b) Failure to take out a Practising Certificate.

3.9 The Registrar's Committee feels that its role is one of help to the erring Solicitor even at

a time when he has been given every chance to rectify the complaint against him. The work

of the Committee is both arduous and time-consuming.

COMPENSATION

FUND

COMMITTEE

4.1 The profession are obliged by statute to provide full indemnity to members of the public

who may suffer loss as a result of defalcation by any practising solicitor. The contribution for

the year under review was fixed at £20.

Gerard M. Doyle,

Chairman

Walter Beatty

John F. Buckley

Anthony E. Collins

Laurence Cullen

James R. C. Green

Brendan A. McGrath

Patrick F. O'Donnell

David R. Pigot

Mrs. Moya Quinlan

4.2 Payments from the fund in respect of ascertained losses and other expenses during the

year amounted to £15,354.

4.3 The book value of the Fund as at 30th April 1974 was £375,201.

4.4 The report of the Compensation Fund for the year ended 30th April 1974 is considered

satisfactory.

225