Previous Page  60 / 84 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 60 / 84 Next Page
Page Background

Unfortunately, and as much as some

would like you to believe, standard

parts are generally not of a high

enough performance or quality

to be suitable for use in harsh

environments, such as defence,

aerospace and space applications.

Extremes of shock, vibration and

temperature, extended life cycles,

possible attack by gases and liquids

require components that have been

designed to work under specific and

often very demanding conditions.

Not only that, but they must be ultra-

reliable…often such applications

simply must not fail, either because

failure would risk life, or the cost

of failure would be astronomical

(sometimes literally!).

The most widely specified and used

standard governing such ‘high-

performance’ parts is the US defence

standard known as MIL -STD. A huge

variety of electronic components –

active, passive, emech, interconnect,

hybrid and even sub-systems – are

covered by various different MIL-

STDs which govern the manufacture

and testing of the parts in question.

All well and good, but there is

a problem. MIL-STD numbers

are associated with a specific

component. Developing MIL-STDs

for new parts is a long process, and

once the standard is developed, for a

component manufacturer to get that

part listed is a long a costly process.

What this means is that engineers

working on designs that require

high performance, high reliability

components will be limited to older

technology components, as new

smaller, lighter, faster – maybe even

cheaper – parts will not yet have had

a MIL-STD created for them, or of it

has, the manufacturer may not yet

have received approval.

Luckily a couple of alternatives are

emerging.

COTS+

Many engineers will have heard

the term COTS – Commercial Off-

The-Shelf. In the USA, COTS is a

Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)

term for commercially-available

items and services that can be

bought and used under government

contract. It has come to be a

widely used term, and the concept

appears especially appealing in

the light of defence budget cuts

and restrictions. However, to put it

COTS

+

and DSCC parts emerge as alternatives

to MIL-STD

Lee Thompson, TTI Inc.

60 l New-Tech Magazine Europe