Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  195 / 272 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 195 / 272 Next Page
Page Background

TAR NC Implementation Document – Second Edition September 2017 |

195

Annex D

Article 8 – Process of Capacity

Weighted Distance Counterfactual

Application

Exits

km

IP3

Consumption

Entries

IP1

150

80

IP2

120

70

Distance matrix (1.c & 1.d)

Exits

Total

GWh /d

IP3

Consumption

Entries

IP1

200

IP2

300

Total

100

400

Forecasted contracted capacity (1.b)

Exits

AD x CAP Weight of costs

%

IP3

Consumption

Entries

IP1

18,800

44%

IP2

24,000

56%

AD x CAP

13,200

29,600

Weight of costs

31% 69%

Weight of costs (2.b)

Exits

Revenues

IP3

Consumption

Entries

IP1

21,963

IP2

28,037

Revenues

15,421

34,579

Revenue per point (2.d)

Exits

Total

km

IP3

Consumption

Entries

IP1

94

IP2

80

Total

132

74

Capacity-weighted average distance (2.a)

Exits

Tariff

€/(GWh/d)

IP3

Consumption

Entries

IP1

110

IP2

93

Tariff

154

86

Tariffs (2.e)

Allowed

Revenue Entry-Exit-Split

Entry %

100.000€

50%

Exit %

50%

Allowed Revenue (1.a & 1.e)

AR (€)

Entry

50,000

Exit

50,000

Revenue Split (2.c)

1

2

3

4

4

1

5

5

Figure 61:

Process for CWD counterfactual