TAR NC Implementation Document – Second Edition September 2017 |
195
Annex D
Article 8 – Process of Capacity
Weighted Distance Counterfactual
Application
Exits
km
IP3
Consumption
Entries
IP1
150
80
IP2
120
70
Distance matrix (1.c & 1.d)
Exits
Total
GWh /d
IP3
Consumption
Entries
IP1
200
IP2
300
Total
100
400
Forecasted contracted capacity (1.b)
Exits
AD x CAP Weight of costs
%
IP3
Consumption
Entries
IP1
18,800
44%
IP2
24,000
56%
AD x CAP
13,200
29,600
Weight of costs
31% 69%
Weight of costs (2.b)
Exits
Revenues
€
IP3
Consumption
Entries
IP1
21,963
IP2
28,037
Revenues
15,421
34,579
Revenue per point (2.d)
Exits
Total
km
IP3
Consumption
Entries
IP1
94
IP2
80
Total
132
74
Capacity-weighted average distance (2.a)
Exits
Tariff
€/(GWh/d)
IP3
Consumption
Entries
IP1
110
IP2
93
Tariff
154
86
Tariffs (2.e)
Allowed
Revenue Entry-Exit-Split
Entry %
100.000€
50%
Exit %
50%
Allowed Revenue (1.a & 1.e)
€
AR (€)
Entry
50,000
Exit
50,000
Revenue Split (2.c)
1
2
3
4
4
1
5
5
Figure 61:
Process for CWD counterfactual