Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  251 292 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 251 292 Next Page
Page Background

251

auricula

of women who gave birth in

the first half of June the

following year, which was also

a leap year, not only gave birth

to a child but also to an ear

(outer). The ear was of natural

size and characterized to a

normal extent by the parents.

The only visible difference

was that where the ear would

typically be connected via a

cranium’s bone and cartilage

structure was a fused scar, a

fold whose insignificance

brought to mi nd a

hermaphrodite’s genitalia. If

the ear had come equipped

with, say, the human being’s

complicated inner workings,

it would have had to learn to

play the hermit crab and find

an object fit to contain its

half-shape. Most ears simply

slipped away during the usual

hullabaloo following a child’s

birth, while others liberated

themselves by clinging to the

afterbirth.Wastemanagement

r e l u c t an t l y

men t i on s

scattered colonies in the

sewers. One can certainly

surmise that some ears were

not able to slip away when

the chance presented, and so

had to escape with a later

birth or simply stay put. Since

the ear is only capable of self-

hearing, however, there is no

disadvantage to its remaining

put, either for the mother or

the ear. In Seem near Ribe,

according to a report given by

the local midwife to the

district medical officer, it so

happened that immediately

after the birth, as the ear in

question was trying to sneak

away, it was mistaken for the

ful ly developed chi ld’s

unevolved twin, stalled by

some fatal process or other.

Later, over coffee and in

consultation with the parents,

it was concluded that at most