79 / 88
MEMORANDUM
Date:
March 3, 2017
To:
AOAC INTERNATIONAL Official Methods Board
From:
Deborah McKenzie, Sr. Director, AOAC Standards Development
Subject:
Representative Voting Members for SPADA
BACKGROUND:
Organizational registrants as of March 1, 2017 is as follows:
Table 1: Organizational Registrants
ATCC
Medical Countermeasure Systems ‐ Diagnostics
CBR Defense Concepts and Experimentation Branch,
Naval Surface Warfare Center
Neogen Corporation
DoD ‐ DBPAO (Formerly Critical Reagents Program)
NIH/NIAID
DHS
NIST
DHS/OHA
Northrop Grumman Electronic Systems
DuPont Nutrition & Health
PNNL
FDA ‐ CFSAN (Retired)
R‐Biopharm Rhone Ltd
FDA Division Of Microbiology
US Army Edgewood Chemical Biological Center
HADECO, LLC
US ARMY MEDCOM USAMRIID
JPdM BDS
US FDA
Lawrence Livermore National Lab (Retired)
USAMRIID
MD Department of Agriculture
There are several ways to analyze the perspectives of the registrants. There are three to four major
categories, which are academia, government, industry, and nongovernmental organizations. Academia
representatives are from educational and research organizations. Government representatives are from
regulatory agencies including domestic, municipal, federal, and international.
1.
Broad perspectives include a view of the registrants in terms of academia, government, industry
and nongovernmental organizations.
2.
Specific perspectives include further categorization of registrants by categories of industry,
categories of government, and if necessary by types of academia.
3.
Regional perspectives include categorization of registrants by regions of the world and/or
regions of a particular region.