Previous Page  64 / 68 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 64 / 68 Next Page
Page Background

126

ACQ

Volume 11, Number 2 2009

ACQ

uiring knowledge in speech, language and hearing

Memory functioning in children with reading

disabilities and/or ADHD.

Kibby, M., & Cohen, M. (2008). Memory functioning in

children with reading disabilities and/or attention deficit/

hyperactivity disorder: A clinical investigation of their working

memory and long-term memory functioning.

Child

Neuropsychology

,

14

, 525–546.

Michelle Quail

Past research has confirmed a link between specific learning

disability in reading (RD) and attention deficit/hyperactivity

disorder (ADHD). This study aimed to investigate the specific

area of memory breakdown in these populations.

The authors hypothesised that children with RD would have

poor verbal short-term memory, unimpaired visual short-

term memory and no deficit in long-term memory (visual

and verbal). Using Baddeley’s model of working memory

(1986, 2000) they anticipated that these results would

reflect a specific deficit in the phonological loop component

of working memory. It was also thought that children with

RD would show greater difficulties on short-term memory

tasks when required to code for phonology as opposed to

semantics. Children with ADHD were predicted to have age-

appropriate phonological processing and long-term memory

skills. However, the central executive (allowing skills such as

problem-solving, mental flexibility, inhibition, motor control,

self-regulation) was thought to be an area of weakness.

This study involved the assessment of 113 children

aged between 6 and 15 years. The groups consisted of

children with RD, ADHD, comorbid RD and ADHD, and

typically developing children. Subtests of the Children’s

Memory Scale were used to assess the different memory

components across the domains of verbal short- and long-

term memory, visual short- and long-term memory, and

attention/working memory. Children with RD were found

to perform poorly on verbal memory tasks when coding by

phonology (e.g., recalling numbers) but not when coding

by semantics (e.g., recalling stories). This supports the

hypothesis that children with RD have a specific deficit

in the phonological loop component of working memory.

Children with ADHD performed well on the majority of verbal

short-term memory tasks and showed a mild deficit in visual

short-term memory which was more apparent in children

who were not on medication. Once general attention was

accounted for, these children showed no deficit on tasks

investigating central executive function. This contradicts the

original hypothesis that this was a specific area of deficit in

children with ADHD. The children with comorbid RD and

ADHD showed deficits reflecting a combination of the results

from the RD and ADHD groups with no additional difficulties.

The clinical implications for children with RD include the

need to relate verbal material to what is already known and

to provide semantic context in order to reduce the need for

phonetic coding. The use of repetition and supplementing

verbal instruction with visual aids will support both clinical

populations. For children with ADHD this will reduce the

pressure on the central executive. Teaching of specific

strategies to support working memory is also recommended.

Rapid serial naming is a predictor of spelling ability.

Savage, R., Pillay, V., & Melidona, S. (2008). Rapid serial

naming is a unique predictor of spelling in children.

Journal

of Learning Disabilities

,

41

(3), 235–250.

Michelle Quail

This study investigated rapid automatic naming (RAN) as a

predictor of spelling abilities. Past research has mainly

variance and 25% of real word reading variance). The family

history variable did not account for any variance above and

beyond these measures.

In conclusion this study suggest that due to the wide

variability in language skill at age 2, language assessment

at age 3 is more accurate in predicting later language and

reading achievement. It also highlights the importance of

monitoring the progress of children who present at the clinic

with poor language skills in their early years, particularly

those at risk for language learning impairment

Investigating the relationship between behaviour

problems and reading difficulties.

Morgan, P., Farkas, G., Tuftis, P., & Sperling, R. (2008). Are

reading and behaviour problems risk factors for each other?

Journal of Learning Disabilities

,

41

(5), 417–436.

Mary Claessen

This paper explores the relationship between behaviour

problems and reading difficulties. Reading difficulties and

behaviour problems frequently co-occur and there are a

number of causal models which attempt to explain the

relationship. These models try to explain whether there is a

common underlying problem which results in both behaviour

and reading difficulties, or whether difficulties in one cause

the other (i.e., difficulties in behaviour resulting in less

attention paid to important reading instruction, or reading

difficulties resulting in frustration, and thus behaviour

difficulties), or finally whether perhaps both reading and

behaviour difficulties cause each other. One recent model

suggests that deficits in executive functioning might lead to

reading difficulties. Executive functions are self-regulatory

processes and include skills such as selective attention,

planning, inhibition, and organisation.

This study explored whether children’s reading problems

predicted later behaviour problems and also whether early

behaviour problems predicted later reading difficulties.

The study used a set of longitudinal date from a sample

of 11,515 children. These children were assessed in

kindergarten, first grade and third grade. For the current

study, results from the following tests were analysed: “The

Reading Test” which comprises a range of tasks to assess

basic reading skills such as phonological awareness tasks,

receptive vocabulary and text comprehension, as well as

a “Teacher Social Rating Scale” which measures a child’s

behaviour.

After controlling for poor attention and socioeconomic

demographics, poor reading ability in first grade was

found to be a statistically and clinically significant predictor

of problem behaviour in third grade. Conversely, when

investigating whether behaviour difficulties in kindergarten

predicted reading difficulties in third grade, it was found

that only one behaviour difficulty (poor task engagement)

increased the likelihood of a child being a poor reader in

third grade. In contrast poor self-control, poor interpersonal

skills and internalising problems did not predict poor reading.

Task engagement may be considered to be proximally

related to poor executive functioning as the child is unable

to self-regulate goal-directed behaviour. And thus this study

supports a restricted executive function model where poor

self-regulation of behaviour constrains the child’s ability to

learn within the demands of a classroom.

Results of this study suggest the need for intervention

which targets both reading and behaviour problems

simultaneously.