Previous Page  74 / 266 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 74 / 266 Next Page
Page Background

(b)

For the same reasons the District Court

should be given jurisdiction in detinue

where the value o f the article detained does

not exceed

£10.

(c)

Jurisdiction in ejectment for overholding

should be increased to include cases where

the rent reserved does not exceed £55 a

year, to cover tenancies at a rent o f

£1

weekly. The present limit of

£zj

in effect

restricts the jurisdiction o f the District

Court to tenement lettings. Furthermore,

in many cases where premises were orig­

inally let at 10/- a week or less plus rates

the increase of the rates alone added to the

rent has already taken the lettings out of

the jurisdiction of the District Court. In

the experience o f solicitors a landlord of

premises let as a single dwelling house may

find it impossible to collect arrears of

rent owing to the delay attendant upon

ejectment proceedings in the Circuit Court.

Several months elapse between the service

o f notice to quit and the order for possession

during which the tenant, who is often not

a mark for the recovery of arrears o f rent-

lives rent free. This is particularly notice,

able where the notice to quit is served

shortly before the long vacation and it is

impossible to obtain judgment before

October or November if a defence is

entered.

ADDENDUM .

The present position of the Society in regard to

the Superior Court Rules Committee is unsatis­

factory. The President is ex-officio the Society’s

representative and is only o f limited service to the

Committee due to the fact that he holds office for

one year only. The Council suggest that a section

should be included in the Bill enabling the Council

to appoint two permanent representatives on the

Committee to hold office for at least five years.

This is the present position on the Circuit Court

Rules Committee.

Signed on behalf of the Council.

J

ames

R.

Q

u irke

,

President.

J

ames

J . O ’C

onnor

,

Vice-President.

E

ric

A P

lunkett

, Secietai-y.

7

th February

, 1953.

DUBLIN SOLICITORS’ BAR

ASSOCIATION

T

he

monthly meeting of the Dublin Solicitors’

Bar Association was held at the Dolphin Hotel,

Dublin, on the 16th day o f February, 1953, when

Dr. G. A. Little, President of the Old Dublin

Society read a very interesting Paper on the Dublin

Law Courts. Dr. Little traced the history o f the

Courts from Scandiaavian times, the erection

of the Public Record Office and the Four Courts

on their present sites, the establishment o f the

Kings’ Inns, the solicitors’ struggle for autonomy

and the foundation o f the Incorporated Law Society

in the Buildings now occupied by it.

Mr. T. J. Kirwan presided and Messrs. Ernest

Proud and James J. O’Connor also spoke.

The next meeting o f the Association was held

at the Dolphin Hotel on the 25th day of March,

1953, when Mr. Vincent Grogan delivered a

lecture entitled, “ Justice in Med fe ral Dublin.”

All solicitors, whether members of the Association

or not, are invited to attend these meetings.

As a result of a request made by the Dublin

Solicitors’ Bar Association to the County Registrar

o f the Dublin Circuit regarding the collection o f

draft payments at Green Street Courthouse, the

County Registrar is kindly arranging that in future

all such payments out may be collected at the Circuit

Court Office, Four Courts, which should prove

much more convenient to practitioners and clients

alike.

As a result of representations made by the Associa­

tion to the Chief Justice concerning the door

adjoining the District Courts .jn the Four Courts

Building which had formerly been closed the

Chief Justice has kindly consented to change the

arrangements and the position now is that the

door has been opened for the use o f members o f the

legal profession.

ACTION UNDER

LORD CAMPBELL’S ACT

Payment o f Costs.

T

he

question of the liability o f the estate of a

deceased person for the costs of an action brought

under Lord Cmpbell’s Act does! not frequently

arise in practice. Probably in the majority of cases

either the action is compromised or a successful

verdict is obtained in which event the costs would

7 2