Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  28 / 350 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 28 / 350 Next Page
Page Background

MAX HILAIRE

CYIL 4 ȍ2013Ȏ

Program. He has traveled extensively, and consulted for the Department of State,

United States Agency for International Development, the Africa Center for Strategic

Studies at the National Defense University inWashington, and various international

organizations. Dr. Hilaire teaches courses both at the graduate and undergraduate

levels in Public International Law, International Organizations & International

Humanitarian Law, United States Foreign Relations Law, International Human

Rights & Humanitarian Law, United Nations Law, and International Relations

Theory.

Dr. Hilaire has authored three books: International Law and United States Military

Intervention in the Western Hemisphere (Kluwer Law International Pub.), United

Nations Law and the Security Council (Ashgate Publisher), and The United States

and International Law (Kendall Hunt Publisher); and a number of journal articles

on international law, international human rights and humanitarian law.

Dr. Hilaire has previously taught at Morgan State University, the Washington

Center, Empire State College in Prague, and University of New York Prague

(UNYP), Central European University in Budapest, Charles University Faculty

of Law in Prague, Anglo-American University in Prague, Obafemi Awolowo

University in Nigeria, Colgate University in New York, Marymount College of

New York, and Universidad de las Americas in Puebla, Mexico.

1. Introduction

United States attitude toward international law is mixed; it is both positive and

negative, depending on the time frame which one is looking at and the administration

in power. It also depends on the issue areas. Different administrations take different

approaches to international law, and their tendency toward trade is quite different

from security issues. However, there is a general underlining trend in United States

attitude toward international law from one administration to the next. To get a better

understanding of U.S. attitude toward international law one must first understand

the structure of the Government of the United States, specifically the allocation of

power between the three equal branches of the federal government, and the division

of power and responsibility between the federal government and the various states.

The U.S. government is unique among Western democracies. In Europe the Prime

Minister or President has absolute power because the executive and legislative branches

are combined, and the head of government commands a majority in parliament,

which allows for automatic passage of any legislation. In the United States system of

government, on the other hand, the executive branch, headed by the president, shares

equal power with the legislative branch, comprising the House of Representatives

and the Senate, and the Supreme Court. The structure of the United States federal

system of government, with several layers of governmental authority at the federal,

state and local levels, makes it difficult to implement and enforce international law

domestically. I will address that structure of power within the federal government

and between the federal government and the states. But before I begin, let me speak