Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  11 / 154 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 11 / 154 Next Page
Page Background

(53 5(9,(:6

ƒ

In your judgment, does the method sufficiently meet the Standard Method

Performance Requirements (SMPR) or communityͲbased guidance?

ƒ

In your judgment is the method scientifically sound and can be followed?

,

ƒ

In your judgment, what are the strengths and weaknesses of the method?

ƒ

In your judgment, how do the weaknesses weigh in your recommendation for

the method?

ƒ

In your judgment, will the method serve well the stakeholder community that

will use the method?

f

f

ƒ

In your judgment, what additional in ormation may be needed to urther

support the method meeting the SMPR or communityͲbased guidance?

(53 0HHWLQJV

ƒ

ERPs will meet in person at a minimum of twice a year and up to four times per year:

ƒ

AOAC MidͲYear meeting (DC metro area)

ƒ

AOAC Annual Meeting.

ƒ 

Ϯ ĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂů ĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƚĞĚ ƚŝŵĞƐ ĨŽƌ ƉƌŽƉƌŝĞƚĂƌLJ ŵĞƚŚŽĚ KƌŐĂŶnjŝĂƚŝŽŶĂů ĨĨŝůŝĂƚĞƐ

ƒ

At the ERP meeting:

ƒ

Primary and secondary reviewers

Žƌ ĞŶƚŝƌĞ ZW

will present their reviews and makes a

motion/recommendation to the ERP whether or not to adopt the method as First

Action OMA.

ƒ

ERP discusses the method.

ƒ

ERP renders a decision on First Action status.

ƒ

ERP renders decisions on modifications to First Action methods only.

ƒ

If the method is adopted

ƒ

ERP decides on what additional information is needed to recommend the method for

Final Action status