![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0242.jpg)
Functional Safety 2014
4
th
– 5
th
November 2014
Copyright © 2014 by Cenbee Bullock PFS Consulting Ltd
Page 8 of 14
Fig. 4 – Swiss cheese model of the Safety Lifecycle
The illustration also tries to correct the general misconception that the majority of human errors lie
in the later stage of the lifecycle activities: for example, restoring operations without resetting the
bypass valve; a block valve associated with a relief valve is left closed after maintenance; or leaving a
transmitter root valve closed.
With reference to some of the major accidents in the past few decades, human errors were found in
various phases of the safety lifecycle. With reference to the UK HSE survey (see Fig. 2), 44% of the
incidents were attributed to inadequate specification of the Safety Instrumented System. These could
be caused by incorrect assumptions during the SIL determination workshop leading to an inaccurate
safety requirement specification and an incorrect design requirement specification. For example, over
claiming the risk reduction credit on an alarm system during the SIL determination workshop. When
the wrong requirement is set out in the beginning, the activities that follow are almost certain to be
incorrect. It often happens that such a mistake may only be discovered when
site integration tests are carried out; or, for example, in the Buncefield oil
storage depot fire, the system testing was not carried out prior to putting the
system online with a consequence of major damage. This is similar to the
domino effect - the system is so vulnerable that when the first domino falls
down, the rest of the dominos will follow on and eventually the whole
construction collapses.
Resolution – Applying a systematic approach
Whatever industry, whether it is a fully-automated or is operated by humans, there is always some
degree of human involvement and it is unlikely that all possible systematic human failures can be
avoided throughout the project lifecycle. A number of studies by various researchers have
investigated how to minimise systematic human failures.
Professor J. Reason
2
states