Previous Page  8 / 338 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 8 / 338 Next Page
Page Background

exercised, could not properly be described as limited

within the means of Article 37.

The Court decided that the powers and functions

assigned

the Disciplinary Committee were not

" limited powers and functions ", that the Com–

mittee was administering justice, and that " such a

tribunal unless composed of Judges is unconsti–

tutional." The Court held that the two appellants

were not validly struck off the roll of solicitors.

The position, therefore, is now that the Incorpora–

ted Law Society has a Disciplinary Committee

which has no powers of any kind whatsoever.

It cannot investigate complaints brought before it,

it cannot suspend a solicitor from practice, it cannot

fine him, it cannot strike his name from the roll of

solicitors, nor, lastly, can it order a solicitor to make

restitution or satisfaction to any aggrieved party.

This state of affairs is so serious and so gravely

affects the profession and the public that it cannot

be allowed to continue. And, furthermore, I under–

stand that this decision not only affects the solicitors'

profession, but also may well affect in like manner

other professions than ours who must equally be

seriously disturbed.

The decision of the Supreme Court in this case

is in my view the most far-reaching interpretation

of the Constitution which has yet been given

by our Courts.

It has, I think, been generally

thought down to the present that Article 37 of the

Constitution, which deals with limited powers of a

judicial nature, authorised the Oireachtas to set up

vocational bodies for various professions with disci–

plinary jurisdiction including power to exclude

practitioners for proved misconduct, subject to an

appeal to the Courts. That view is no longer correct

if the effect of the assigned disciplinary powers is

to affect profoundly those against whom they are

exercised in their property, fortunes or reputation.

When the Society accepted the obligation to establish

the Compensation Fund and to provide full indem–

nity for clients from 1960 onwards, it was thought

essential in the interests of the financial stability of

the Fund to secure the powers which have now been

held to be invalid. The necessary counterpart of the

Compensation Fund is a fair, effective and speedy

disciplinary procedure. It is also necessary that the

Society should have effective powers to forestall and

prevent defalcations. Without such protection the

Council cannot ensure that the Fund will be solvent.

It is now the immediate duty of the Council to seek

powers which will be both effective and constitu–

tional so that the public and the profession may not

continue to suffer serious injury from the actions

of a small number of dishonest practitioners.

As soon as the judgment of the Supreme Court

was pronounced, the Council of the Society sought

an interview with the Minister for Justice to ask

for amending legislation to establish a new disci–

plinary system. TheMinister for Justice and the officers

of his Department met our deputation most sympa–

thetically and gave us an assurance that such legis–

lation would be brought forward immediately. The

Council have already submitted to the Department

a memorandum dealing with the matter and they

have been in constant touch with the Department

of Justice since then. I hope and believe that we

shall have new legislation passed through the Ddil

and Seanad before the Summer recess. It will be

realised that this is a most difficult and complicated

matter and must be approached with the greatest

care and in the greatest detail, and I can assure you

that the Council will spare no effort whatsoever to

recover the necessary disciplinary powers which are

so essential to the proper rule and supervision of

our profession.

SOLICITORS' ACCOUNTS REGULATION.

The Solicitors Account Regulations were settled

and passed some years ago and by now every

member of our profession knows the tenor or these

regulations and what they contain. Shortly it may

be said that they provide that every solicitor shall

keep his clients' money separately from his own and

that he shall keep his clients' money in a client

account at a bank. Clients' moneys may be dealt

with only in the manner provided by these Regula–

tions ; and in addition a solicitor shall at all times

keep properly written-up such books and accounts

as may be necessary to show all his dealings with and

particulars of, and information as to clients' moneys,

and may be required to submit his accounts at any

time to the Council for scrutiny.

By an Order dated the jth December, 1957, signed

by me as President by direction of the Council and

by the Chief Justice, the regulations dealing with

the keeping of proper books of account were

brought into operation on the ist January, 1958,

and they have been in operation since that date.

By the same Order it was provided that the re–

mainder of the Solicitors' Accounts Regulations

shall come into operation on the ist July next, and

after that date every solicitor practising in Ireland

will be bound by these regulations and must carry

out their requirements in accurate detail. From the

ist July next every solicitor must open and keep

a client account at a bank and into this account

he must pay all moneys which he receives on behalf

of his client as provided in Part II of the Regulations

nor can he withdraw any clients' money from a

client account except as therein set out.