Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  29 / 92 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 29 / 92 Next Page
Page Background

Transatlantic cable

November 2015

27

www.read-eurowire.com

Mr Hoium’s main explanation for the discrepancy is the same

as anyone else’s: the relative availability of electric vis-à-vis

hydrogen recharging infrastructure. According to the US

Department of Energy there are 10,353 public electric charging

stations across the country, with 26,025 charging outlets. In

addition, tens of thousands of private stations are in home

garages and at business locations.

Mr Hoium wrote: “On the hydrogen side, California has two

charging stations completed. TWO!” Toyota is hoping to have

15 stations open in California by the end of the year. But this

scarcely reduces the challenge of getting around the state, still

less cross-country, on hydrogen alone.

Why not simply build more hydrogen charging stations?

Here again it is a question of accessibility. Electricity is readily

available in most of the USA, and even remote locations can use

distributed energy like solar power to charge vehicles. Hydrogen

must be generated from natural gas and then shipped to the

charging stations. The cost of building the infrastructure needed

to power hydrogen vehicles on a commercial scale would run

into the billions.

A $57,500 bet on the Mirai

Mr Hoium makes the interesting point that a hydrogen-powered

car is actually an electric vehicle with additional components.

A hydrogen fuel cell does not have a direct connection to the

crankshaft of the car: it produces electricity, which is stored in

a battery for transfer to the electric motor that enables driving.

In this respect he concedes to FCVs the advantages over EVs

of a smaller battery pack and shorter refuelling time. But he

holds that the components in an EV are in many ways simpler

and more adjustable than in a hydrogen-powered car. He cites

the Tesla Motors Model S with its batteries in the oor of the

car, lowering the centre of gravity and improving performance.

Hydrogen cars do not have the same exibility.

Nothing daunted, Toyota is doubling down on hydrogen with

its $57,500 Mirai, the rst mass-market car to run o hydrogen.

Mr Hoium of the

Motley Fool

(its contributors call themselves

Fools – one assumes in jest) terms it an uphill battle pitting a

small installed base and weak infrastructure against an installed

base of electric vehicles that could reach one million in 2016.

He declared: “The alternative fuel debate is all but over.”

†

A similar view was expressed earlier in the year by Joe

Romm, founding editor of the ecology blog

Climate Progress

.

Noting that Toyota had backed away from its partnership

with Tesla to build an EV, he wrote (8

th

April), “For reasons

that mostly defy logic the otherwise shrewd car company

Toyota is placing a large bet on hydrogen fuel cell cars,”

starting with the Mirai.

“Toyota is going to lose this bet,” Mr Romm atly asserted.

“There is little reason to believe FCVs will ever beat electric

vehicles in the car market. There is even less reason to

believe they will ever be a cost-e ective carbon-reducing

strategy, as EVs already are close to being.”

†

Still another interested observer, the

Washington Post

reporter Drew Harwell, noted that Toyota has a track record

for “disruption,” having built the rst mass-produced hybrid,

the Prius, from “an experimental laughing stock” into a clean

and unexciting mainstream sedan. He wrote, (12

th

May),

“While still a niche – hybrids make up only three per cent of

American car sales – the Prius became emblematic of a way

normal drivers could help save the world without trying too

hard.”

Mr Harwell was told by David Whiston, an equity strategist

with investment researcher Morningstar: “Toyota is so big

that [the Mirai] can still be a science experiment for them. If

it doesn’t work out they can go back to selling Priuses and all

the other gas guzzlers no one ever talks about.”

†

If this view of its hydrogen fuel-cell vehicle initiative

commends itself to Toyota, the company isn’t saying.

Elsewhere in automotive . . .

†

Improper wiring in a roof-mounted air bag has led General

Motors to issue a global recall of 73,424 Chevrolet Cobalts.

GM said on 13

th

August that improper routing of a sensor

wire in the driver’s-side front door could prevent the air bag

from deploying after a crash.

The issue a ects Cobalts from the 2010 model year. There

are 59,474 of the small cars on the road in the USA, 13,950

in Canada. The Detroit-based automaker said the recall

is unrelated to last year’s recall of millions of Cobalts for

defective ignition switches, which could stall the vehicle and

turn o the air bags.

†

In robot-intensive manufacturing industries, such as

automotive bodywork factories, robots consume about half

the total energy needed for production. Now, researchers

at Chalmers University of Technology, in Sweden, report

that smoothing robot movements can reduce energy

consumption by up to 40 per cent, even as the plant’s

schedule is maintained. The results were achieved with an

algorithm that, by altering not the path but only the speed

and sequence of operations of several robots moving in the

same area, optimises their acceleration and deceleration as

well as time spent at a standstill.

Professor of automation Bengt Lennartson – who initiated

the research together with, among others, General Motors –

said on the Chalmers website: “We simply let [a robot] move

slower instead of waiting for other robots and machines to

catch up before carrying out the next sequence.”

Energy

With higher power generation and lower

installed prices, solar power in the USA is

looking better all the time

To Governor Jerry Brown, whose goal for California is that it

receives at least 50 per cent of its electricity from renewable

energy resources by the year 2030, recent news reports have

been more than encouraging.

As noted by James Ayre on the website

CleanTechnica

(27

th

August), the state’s grid operator reported a new electricity

generation record for utility-scale solar energy of 6.391

gigawatts (GW) of alternating current on 20

th

August.

That gure covers both utility-scale solar photovoltaic (PV)

and concentrating solar power (CSP) projects. It does not

include the output of distributed solar energy system output

(so-called “behind-the-meter” electricity generation), whose

inclusion would have pushed the total even higher. By way of

comparison, Boston-based GTM Research estimated the total

distributed solar system capacity in California at 3.2GW for

rst-quarter 2015.