Previous Page  153 / 264 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 153 / 264 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

JULY

Norman of the Institute then deals with processes of

mechanization such as telex, computers, union

catalogues, the MARC system of the Library of Congress

and subject analysis.

The detailed Index of Works Cited alphabetically

comprises no less than 51 pages. It will thus be seen that

the needs of the English and Scots Law Librarians have

been magnificently served by this volume. On the whole,

Jill Mclvor has seen to it that, in the relevant places,

Northern Ireland gets its fair share of mention, save that

the invaluable monthly unreported judgments of the

Incorporated Council of Law Reporting in Northern

Ireland, published with an Index in blue covers

continuously since 1970, do not appear to have been

mentioned.

The same cannot be said about the Republic of Ireland,

because, as far as is known, the text was not submitted to

any law librarian here.

Inter alia,

mention must be make

of the following:—

(1) Delany's

Administration of Justice in Ireland

almost

in its 5th edition, is not even mentioned.

(2) It is stated at page 33, that in the Republic of Ireland,

the function of the National Library is performed by

Trinity College. This will hardly please the hard

working staff of the National Library.

(3) One would not expect our Society with its 1,700

members to have the same library space as the

English Law Society with its 20,000 members.

(4) The Common Law of Ireland was not identical with,

but separate from the Common Law of England. See

Byrne v. Ireland

(1972) I.R.

(5) The Irish Constitution of 1937, which is the

Fundamental Law of the land, supplanting all

Statutes, is inaccurately described in

4

lines. The

importance of Irish constitutional case law could

have been stressed.

(6) No distinction is made between the Irish Jurist (1935-

65), which contained reported cases, and the present

Irish Jurist from 1966, which is an academic legal

journal of a high standard.

(7) The earlier Irish named Reports, prior to the Irish

Law Reports (1839) are barely mentioned.

(8) It is blandly stated that there is no legal literature of

any substance on Irish law reports, and law

reporting: see Geoffrey Bing's lecture to the Society

of Young Solicitors.

(9) The list of Irish official publications is incomplete.

(10) Delany's work on Chief Baron Palles, which

contains a list of Irish judges from 1878 to 1921,

should have been included amongst legal

bibliographies.

These are only the most important omissions. The

main work can be recommended as a model of its kind,

and anyone who wishes to learn anything about Law

Librarianship cannot afford to be without it.

The Law Reform Commission (Working Paper No. 1-1977)

The law relating to the Liability of Builders,

Vendors and Lessors for the Quality and

Fitness of Premises

The working paper, in reviewing the present law relating

to builders, vendors and lessors of premises, highlights the

absence of legal protection for purchasers and lessees.

House purchasers in making what is commonly referred

to as

v

*the longest payment of their lives" are

inadequately protected by the law as it now stands.

Purchasers and hirers of goods receive a measure of legal

protection in the Sale of Goods Act 1893 and the Hire

Purchase Acts 1946-60, but the purchasers or lessees of

land (including houses) have little or no such protection.

For them the legal rule is expressed in the maxim:

caveat

emptor—

let the buyer beware. The house purchaser has

to look for himself. This is most vividly expressed by the

judicial dictum that there is no law against letting or

Selling a "tumbledown house".

The Law Reform Commission takes the view that

house purchasers (whether full owners or lessees) should

get more protection from the law and to this end it has

prepared for discussion a working paper proposing a

general scheme of new legislation to improve their lot in

several ways, the most important of which are:

(i) Any person who undertakes building work should

owe a duty to see that the work is done in a good and

workmanlike (or professional) manner and with proper

materials. Where the premises consist of a dwelling,

the builder should have a legal duty to ensure that

they will be reasonably fit for habitation. It is to be

noted that these duties will also be imposed on the

participating financial "backers" of the builder.

(ii) Where a person sells or leases premises in the course

of business and where the buyer/lessee makes known

the purpose for which he wants the premises, a

118

condition should be implied in the contract that the

premises are reasonably fit for that particular

purpose.

(iii) In so far as injury to persons or property results from

defects in premises, vendors and lessors should owe a

duty to take reasonable care to see that persons who

might be affected by these defects are not injured in

their person or in their property by the defects.

However, for the vendor or lessor to be bound, such

defects must have been known to him, and must exist

at the time of the sale or lease.

(iv) Breach of any duty imposed by the legislation will

give the purchaser/lessee a right to damages.

(v) The rights given under the new legislation should be

in addition to any other common lawrights which the

purchaser/lessee might have. The new law should

ensure that the proposed statutory obligations are

mandatory ones, incapable of being excluded by

contract.

The working

paper

also suggests that these reforms

should be reinforced by a scheme that would ensure the

technical ability and the financial stability of builders.

This, however, it suggests could be achieved by a

Registration Scheme which need not be statutory in form.

Many precedents for such schemes exist in other

countries and there is also the recently proposed scheme

announced by the Department of Local Government and

the C.I.F. (Construction Industry Federation) which,

however, the Commission does not recommend.

Comments on the working paper are invited by 1

November, 1977.

Copies of the working paper may be obtained from

The Law Reform Commission, River House, Chancery

Street, Dublin, 7, or W. King Limited, Law Stationers,

18 Eustace Street, Dublin, 2. Price £1.50 Net.