Previous Page  34 / 264 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 34 / 264 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

APRIL 1977

Is that a little bit of playing with figures, though?

I think it is a little bit of playing with figures by the

Commission, because it certainly is not playing with

figures by us, it is anything but. And, also, I think it is

very unfair that it has not been highlighted that the

increase that was received since January 1964 was in

Autumn 1972. That is the only increase and it was 20%.

The Rules Committee recommended 40% and the

Government vetoed it and reduced it to 20%. So, since

1964 until now, in the last 13 years there has only been a

20% increase and the present increase was based on a

1974 recommendation so we're running much faster to

stand still, working longer hours and there is a serious, a

very serious aspect of this. We tried to highlight the

problem of the solicitor in the rural area, we tried to get

an increase for him in the Land Registry scale because

these solicitors are not finding it in any way

economic to bring in assistants to cut out delays — in fact

a lot of them cannot afford to pay the going rate to an

assistant solicitor, they are getting older, their health is

suffering, the work has to be done, they provide in many

cases a social service and now the increase which would

help to cut out the delays which you highlight is not being

given and this is going to be serious. The Government is

going to regret this.

Well the position that, I think, a lot of listeners would

adopt is that solicitors in many, many cases do not

provide a very good service and you know the number of

complaints that come through this office and that I have

been in touch with you about and other colleagues of

yours as well, and are you saying that if the fees aren't

increased substantially that kind of delay, that kind of

problem, is going to continue.

I think in rural Ireland it is going to get worse in certain

areas because delays often arise because people do not

have enough staff. The delays now in many of the

Governmnet offices arise because of this. There is 66|%

more applications in the Land Registry in the last 12

months than before and there is no increase in staff. How

can the same staff deal with 6 6 | increase? And if a man

is suffering from bad health and getting older he should be

able to pay an assistant and bring him into the practice. If

the fees are not economic he is not going to be able to do

that, and it is going to mean practices will close and it is

going to mean you are going to get more drift towards the

city. At the moment most of the big work goes towards

the cities and we wanted to try and give the country

solicitors a better and fairer crack of the whip so that they

could provide the service which is very essential for the

country as a whole.

Do you find that at the moment there are a lot of young

solicitors qualifying and then not going back to where

they came from?

This is the problem and there is also the problem which

most people do not think about, because it does not effect

them, but the liberty of the citizen is at stake. If there is

not a lawyer on tap in the local village or town, it is going

to cause problems.

Do you think that perhaps you could overcome that by

getting down to talking about demarcations between

yourselves and barristers? Things like that which might

make it easier and indeed work that perhaps a solicitor's

clerk could appropriately do?

Well, solicitor's clerks could not deal with court work,

they could not go in and defend

No but Conveyancing for example which is

recommended for the Examiner of Restrictive Practices

Well, yes in simple cases they can and under

supervision they do at the moment, but they must be

supervised. It is also significant that it is very

unfortunate that you cannot say to yourself that the

profession is guaranteed a future which it should have

had if the Consultant's recommendations had been

accepted, particularly in rural Ireland.

I saw afigure in a newspaper today of £40 per hour for

a solicitor in the High Court. £40 an hour is good money

by anybody's standards.

I am glad you raised that because that sounds very

attractive and I wish it were true, but the £40 an hour

takes into account all the research and background work.

It is like saying a doctor is paid £1 a minute because he

charges £60 for an hour's operation. But in fact he has

consultancy work beforehand, he has to examine the

patient, he has to look at X-rays, there is a lot of

background work. It is the same with the legal profession.

In no way do you go in at 11 o'clock and you come out at

12 o'clock with £40. That would be ludicrous and we do

not want that.

But looking at the difference between the money that

you calculated to be getting for the High Court, Circuit

Court and the District Court, is it because there is much

more work involved in the High Court case?

That includes the time that was spent preparing the

barristers brief, taking statements from witnesses, going

out to the scene of the accident, instructing the mapper,

going along and interviewing Gárdai, interviewing

doctors, surgeons, looking at X-rays, passing them on to

doctors. There is an enormous amount of back-up work,

and in criminal work it is just the same. So you just do not

go in and get £40 an hour —no way.

What would you say to Mrs. Smith in the Street who said

she never saw a poor solicitor?

Well that it would be a poor profession that was going

round in dilapidated condition. It would not inspire much

confidence to Mrs. Smith. I think we must try and keep up

appearances and that is what we try to do.

And does that mean that you have to have very big fees to

do that?

I think the fees are not very big if you see the

Commission's own figures. They are talking about an

average for solicitors of £6,500 a year in round figures. I

do not think there is anything extraordinary about that.

There are many, many electricians and more power to

them and other skilled people who are earning much

more.

27