Background Image
Previous Page  39 / 68 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 39 / 68 Next Page
Page Background

39

As land under tropical agriculture occupies a wide range of soil

types and climates, the capacity for carbon sequestration can

differ considerably. In hot and dry areas where soil has been de-

graded, implementation can restore carbon and prevent further

losses. In humid climates the potential for carbon sequestra-

tion can reach one tonne per ha. According to some estimates,

degraded soils represent half of the world’s carbon sequestra-

tion potential (Lal 2004a).

One management practice with a high potential for carbon

sequestration in tropical areas is agroforestry. In agroforest-

ry systems, food production is combined with tree planting.

Because of the trees, agroforestry systems store more carbon

as plant biomass and have a higher potential for soil carbon

sequestration than conventional agricultural systems (Nair

et al.

2009). Biodiversity benefits may also be realised. Aver-

age carbon storage by agroforestry practices is estimated at

around 10 tonnes per ha in semi-arid regions, 20 tonnes per

ha in sub-humid and 50 tonnes per ha in humid regions, with

sequestration rates of smallholder agroforestry systems in

the tropics being around 1.5–3.5 tonnes of carbon per ha per

year (Montagnini and Nair 2004). In addition, agroforestry

systems can reduce the pressure on natural forests thereby

having indirectly a positive effect on carbon storage in the lat-

ter (Montagnini and Nair 2004).

However, as with conventional agricultural systems, sustain-

able management practices also need to be adopted in agrofor-

estry systems to ensure carbon sequestration and sustainable

water use.

In some systems, interference interactions between crop species

and trees planted as part of agroforestry measures may have a

negative impact on crop yields (Garcia-Barrios 2003). In these

circumstances, compromise solutions may be best, aiming to

store reasonable rather than maximum amounts of carbon while

still ensuring profitability from crops (Verchot

et al.

2005).