Previous Page  123 / 424 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 123 / 424 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

P R E S I D E N T ' S

M E S S A G E

MEDIWH

M

ARCH1995

Solicitor Judges

The Law Society Dinner was held on

6 April. Among the guests who

attended the dinner were prominent

members of the Oireachtas;

judiciary; diplomatic corps; public

service, and business and

professional organisations. This

annual dinner serves as an

opportunity to return hospitality to

those who have provided us with

same during the year.'More

importantly it serves as an

opportunity to engender good

relations with those people and

organisations who are important to

the solicitors' profession.

We were honoured this year to have

as our special guest speaker.

His

Honour Justice Michael Sachs

from

the High Court of England and Wales

who made history by being the first

solicitor in our neighbouring

jurisdiction to be appointed a High

Court judge. The motivation behind

inviting Judge Sachs was to highlight

the fact that in the UK solicitors are

eligible for appointments to the High

Court. He was made a High Court

Judge in 1993 due to legislation

passed two years previously to end

the Bar's monopoly of senior judicial

appointments.

The present position in law in this

country is that, except in the District

Court, solicitors are not eligible for

appointment to judicial office. In

1994, the Government announced

proposed changes in our judicial

system in the form of the Courts and

Court Officers Bill. This Bill

provides for solicitors to be eligible

for appointment to the Circuit Court

bench - though sadly not to the

higher courts.

Why are solicitors not considered

suitable for appointment to the

Superior Courts? The fact that this is

the case today, is a relic of history

and seems to be based essentially on

the view that experience as an

advocate in the higher courts is a

prerequisite for appointment to the

bench. The argument that only those

who had engaged in advocacy in the

Superior Courts should be appointed

as judges in those courts has, been

discredited by the appointment of

solicitors in other jurisdictions

who have proved to be excellent

judges.

I read with interest recently a profile

in

Proctor

, the legal journal of the

Queensland Law Society of

Judge

Robertson

who is the only solicitor

to have been appointed to the

District Court Bench in that

jurisdiction since its inception in

1959. Judge Robertson stated in the

article: "It is a myth that you have to

go to the Bar to achieve the

transition from the profession to the

Bench. But it is important that

people who are appointed have a

very good grounding in the rules

of evidence and the rules of

practice."

Experience has shown that the best

advocates do not necessarily make

the best judges and, correspondingly,

that some of the most able judges in

the past did not have distinguished

careers as advocates. Surely, the

person's knowledge of the law and

his or her standing as a lawyer,

independence of mind,

administrative ability, judgment and

decisiveness are amongst the

qualities that are more desirable than

experience as an advocate. Vital

personal qualities are patience,

courtesy and compassion.

There is no logical reason why a

solicitor should not be considered

for judicial appointments to all

courts including the High Court and

the Supreme Court.

Patrick A. Glynn

Doyle Court Reporters

Principal:

Áine O'Farrell

Court, Conference, AGMs,

Business Meetings, Arbitrations.

Verbatim Reporting - Daily Transcripts

2, Arran Quay, Dublin 7. Tel: 872 2833 or 286 2097 (After Hours) Fax: 872 4486

Excellence in (Reporting since 1954

99