Previous Page  68 / 424 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 68 / 424 Next Page
Page Background

Fax Transmissions

Since the advent of facsimiles, there

have been a number of articles

published in the Gazette, one in

particular dealing with the question of

confidentiality. However, it would

appear that the time is right for a

I further reminder to the profession that

it seems caution should be taken with

regard to dealing with a clients

j business by way of facsimile message.

What may not be a confidential matter

for any of us may indeed be very

confidential from the point of view of a

client. People practising in each

different area of law should stop and

look at what might be confidential

from their client's point of view and in

those circumstances, should contact the

client and get specific instructions that

a facsimile message can be put through

or otherwise as the case may be.

In an ideal world, I would strongly

recommend that when taking initial

instructions from a client, one would

seek the written consent of the client

that the matter be dealt with where

necessary by way of facsimile message.

Despite our best endeavours, we cannot

overrule human error and if a member

of our staff happens to send a facsimile

message dealing with a client's

business to a wrong number, albeit that

it contains a disclaimer, it is my view

that we are immediately exposed to a

claim for breach of confidentiality.

If the client gives an instruction that

the matter can be dealt with by way of

facsimile message, he may very well

have a specific fax number to which,

he wishes the message to be sent. He

may wish to utilise a "mailbox" facility

on his fax machine. This enables the

transmission to be stored in the

receiving machine until a security code

is keyed in. The relevant details could

be written on the outside of the file or

if the file has a sheet attached giving

the name, address and phone number

| - of the client, it could be inserted here.

Niall Casey, Chairman

Professional Purposes

Committee

Employing Foreign Lawyers

Solicitors employing foreign lawyers

as agents are personally liable for

their fees.

The Professional Purposes Committee

of the Law Society is very frequently

asked to consider complaints from

í foreign lawyers, who have been

| employed by Irish solicitors as agents,

but who have not been paid their fees.

The Committee has no alternative but

to direct immediate payment by the

Irish solicitor, if necessary from his

personal funds. The strict professional

I duty to pay such fees is clearly set out

in the "Guide to Professional Conduct

of Solicitors in Ireland":

| . . . . "A solicitor who instructs a lawyer

| outside the jurisdiction is liable,

personally, to pay all fees reasonably

j

and properly incurred by that lawyer

unless there has been an express

agreement that such solicitor is not to

: be made personally liable".

j

This reflects the position as set out in

the IBA International Code of Ethics

j

and the CCBE Code of Conduct for

Lawyers in the European Community.

Many Irish solicitors appear to engage

foreign agents without first discussing

fees. They presume that their foreign

colleagues will not seek payment unless

i and until the Irish solicitor is in funds

í and, if necessary, will seek payment

directly from the client.

j A bill of costs can of course be

challenged on the basis of the work not

having been carried out, or the fees

being excessive. However, Irish

j

solicitors, frequently allow

| opportunities to question the bill to pass

i until it is too late.

If an Irish solicitor wishes to avoid

personal liability for fees an express

agreement in relation to the matter must

be made when the agent is appointed.

Besides the matter of fees, solicitors

should also ensure when an agent is

appointed, that the foreign lawyer and

the client understand that the Irish

solicitor has no expertise in the foreign

legal system and relies on the foreign

lawyer to advise fully in relation to all

matters, including the feasibility of the

action being taken.

The circumstances of the case will not

i

always require that a foreign agent is

appointed. It may be perfectly

satisfactory for clients to be directed to

an embassy or other agency who will

refer them to a lawyer in the particular

jurisdiction and whom they will instruct

j

directly. The relationship of an agent

| does not arise and personal liability for

I fees does not follow in that situation.

The difficulties arising for Irish

solicitors were clearly demonstrated in

{ a recent case where a foreign lawyer

failed to advise that the Irish client

would probably qualify for civil legal

aid. He sent his bill of costs to the Irish

solicitor. The bill was taxed, the Irish

solicitor not having arranged to be

represented at taxation. The foreign

lawyer demanded payment from the

solicitor personally. The solicitor was

required to pay.

! Niall Casey, Chairman

j Professional Purposes

Committee

English Agents:

Agency work

undertaken for Irish solicitors in

both litigation and non-contentious

matters - including legal aid. Fearon

& Co., Solicitors, Westminster

House, 12 The Broadway, Woking,

Surrey GU21 5AU.

Tel: 0044-483-726272

.

Fax:

0044-483-725807.

44