Previous Page  33 / 364 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 33 / 364 Next Page
Page Background

Section z6

amends section 5 2 (3) of the Finance Act,

1920, so as to bring private unlimited companies

within the ambit of Corporation Profits Tax as

respects profits arising on or after i January, 1964.

Section

27 raises from £1,500 to £2,500 the limit

on the deduction which may be allowed for the

remuneration of a director in computing, for the

purposes of Corporation Profits Tax, the profits of a

director-controlled company. The new limit will

apply as respects accounting periods ending after

31 December, 1963.

CERTIFIED COPIES, GRANTS OF

PROBATE AND ADMINISTRATION

MEMBERS please note that they may now, when

lodging papers with applications for grants and pro–

bate, bespeak extra copies of grants for registration

with limited Companies etc., This should be done at

the same time when lodging the papers for the grant

and the extra copies will be available when the

grant is taken up. Members are requested not to

make separate applications as this may cause delay.

INSURANCE ACT, 1964

THE object of this Act is to provide relief for the

policy holders of the Equitable Insurance Company

Limited. In May 1963 the Minister for Industry

and Commerce petitioned the High Court for the

winding up of the Equitable Insurance Company

Limited on the ground that it was insolvent; shortly

afterwards the necessary winding up order was

made by the Court. Though the preparation of the

Act was prompted by the failure of

this one

company, the arrangements which it set up are of a

general and continuing nature, so that there will

also be suitable machinery for the relief of policy

holders in the case of any future insurance insolvency.

The main features of this scheme as envisaged by

the Act are as follows:

(a)

All non-life licensed Insurance Companies will

contribute to the fund in accordance with the

Insurance Compensation Fund in accordance

with their premium income. A non repayable

contribution of £30,000 will be made to

the Fund by the State with the object of

covering the Equitable's Workmens' Com–

pensation Liabilities.

(&) Funds will be available to meet claims under

policies issued by any insolvent insurance

company which is being wound up by the

High Court; the eligible classes of insurance

will be those for which a licence is needed

under the Insurance Acts, other than life;

creditors other than those claiming under

eligible policies will not have access to the

Fund.

(c)

As the annual contributions envisaged will

not be sufficient to discharge the liabilities

of the Equitable within a short space of time

the Minister for Finance will make loans to

the Fund to enable it to cover all outstanding

claims without delay; these loans will be

repaid to the Minister for Finance in due

course.

Section 8 of the Act amends Section 22 of the Act

of 1936 so that a deposit of £100,000 shall be

required from each insurance company by way of

deposit no matter how many classes of business it

carries on. Section 12 of the Act deals with the

purchase and sale of shares of the Irish Life Assurance

Company Limited, by the Minister for Finance

while Section 13 makes provision regarding the

construction of Articles of Association of the Irish

Life Assurance Company Limited. In this connection

the observations of the Minister for Industry and

Commerce on the second reading of the Bill in the

Seanad, should be noted:- "I need hardly mention

that these provisions have no connection whatever

with the other provisions of the Bill; that they were

inserted in this Bill primarily to save the Oireachtas

the time and trouble of dealing with a separate

measure."

(See Seanad Reports Vol. 57 No. 16 ist July, 1964.)

COMMISSIONERS OF CHARITABLE

DONATIONS & BEQUESTS;

BOARD MEETINGS

MICHAELMAS TERM 1964

Tuesday

6th October, 1964

2Oth

1964

3rd November, 1964

17th

1964

i st December, 1964

15th

1964

CASES OF THE MONTH

Solicitors' right to apply for costs in Divorce application

A

HUSBAND and wife each filed petitions for

divorce against the other, the wife charging the

husband with cruelty, and

the husband cross-

charging the wife with adultery. Both suits were

defended, the wife was granted legal aid in respect

of each. The husband was ordered to give security