Previous Page  93 / 364 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 93 / 364 Next Page
Page Background

T. N. O'Meara, Thomas J. O'Reilly, lan A. Scott

(B.C.L.), John R. Sweeney.

31 candidates attended ; 20 passed.

COMMISSIONERS

OF

CHARITABLE

DONATIONS & BEQUESTS BOARD

MEETINGS

(Easter and Trinity Terms)

Tuesday

...

...

zjth

April,

1965

nth

May,

...

zjth

ijth

June,

...

29th

13th

July,

...

2 7 th

J. S. MARTIN, Secretary.

7th April, 1965.

THE EQUITABLE INSURANCE

COMPANY LIMITED—SOLICITORS

INDEMNITY AGAINST COSTS

The solicitors for the Official Liquidator have

informed the Society that in a recent application by

the Official Liquidator to The High Court (Mr.

Justice Kenny) entitled 1965 No. 318? it was

established

that

the undermentioned costs

are

properly payable out of the Insurance Compensation

Fund. Such costs will be paid in the first instance

under Court Order to the Official Liquidator under

Section 3

(i*)for transmission to the Policyholder.

(a)

Costs of Policyholder's solicitor incurred in

defending claim against the Policyholder where said

solicitor was nominated to represent Policyholder

by The Equitable Insurance Company Limited prior

to liquidation.

(b~)

Costs of Policyholder's Solicitor incurred in

defending a claim against a Policyholder where the

solicitor was instructed by the Policyholder to act

after the commencement of the Liquidation with the

consent of the Official Liquidator.

(c)

Costs of Policyholder's solicitor necessarily

and reasonably incurred in endeavouring to secure

payment for the Policyholder out of the Fund of the

amount due to him under the policy.

Costs in all or any of the said three categories

must be taxed if the Liquidator so requires.

It is understood that the claims against the Fund

are under consideration and that the necessary

applications to the Court for payment of the ap

propriate sums will be made in the near future.

Members please note that the Liquidator will make

payment in respect of damages and costs by way of

one cheque which will be payable to the policyholder.

Members ought to take such steps as are necessary

to protect their interests as although they will be

notified of payment of the amount to the Policy-

holder the cheques for the amount of the damages

and/or costs will be sent to the policyholders dierct.

As to the right of a solicitor to a charging order

for costs over property recovered or preserved for a

client see the Legal Practitioners (Ir.) Act, 1876

(Members' Handbook, page 171).

CASES OF THE MONTH

Grant of Probate—solicitor's estate

Where a deceased solicitor was at the time of his

death in practice, either in his own name or as a sole

solicitor under a firm name, the interests of his

former clients may be jeopardised if the persons

entitled to constitute themselves the solicitor's legal

personal representatives fail to apply for and obtain

a grant of representation in respect of his estate

within a reasonable time after the date of his death.

The court has power in the exercise of the discretion

conferred upon it by Section 162 of the Supreme

Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act, 1925 (i),

as amended by Section 9 of the Administration of

Justice Act, 1928 (i), to make an order for a grant

in respect of the deceased's estate to issue to a

nominee or nominees of the Law Society. The grant

will be general or limited as

the court thinks

expedient in the circumstances.

In the first place the affidavit setting out the

grounds of the application must be submitted in

draft to a Registrar of the Principal Probate Registry.

The latter will thereupon give directions as to

whether the application may be made

ex parte

to

a registrar, without notice to any other persons, or

on summons to a Registrar, or in special circum

stances, a judge.

If the application is to be on summons, the

registrar will also direct upon whom the summons

is to be served. For this purpose the draft affidavit

should show who are the persons first entitled to

a general grant, so far as it has been practicable to

discover their identity within the time available, and

should also deal with the practicability of serving

them with a copy of the summons.

This practice note which appeared in (1965)

i All. E.R., p. 924 may be followed in this country

under Section 12 of the Administration of Estates

Act, 1959.

Solicitor taking secret profit

The decision in Phipps

v.

Boardman and Ors.

arrived at by Wilberforce J., in the Court of first

instance and reported in the Society's GAZETTE for

Aug.-Sept. 1964 at page 30 was confirmed by the

Court of Appeal (Lord Denning M.R., Pearson