Previous Page  36 / 60 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 36 / 60 Next Page
Page Background

162

ACQ

Volume 11, Number 3 2009

ACQ

uiring knowledge in speech, language and hearing

Future directions

Four new early intervention and prevention programs have

now been established, at the Austin, Royal Children’s

Hospital, Bendigo and North Eastern CAMHS. Collectively,

these programs are now known by the acronym CASEA

(CAMHS and Schools Early Action), the name reflecting

collaboration between the Mental Health and Education

services. Although all CASEA programs have the same

model and over-riding philosophy, they have evolved as

separate programs, with slightly different emphases, staffing

and execution of the program.

KKPP is a program constantly developing program and

is committed to evaluating its outcomes. Future directions

include further research and university partnerships, more

links with community agencies, and extending the work

to the preschool population. The work to date has been

exciting and stimulating with positive outcomes overall,

showing that a collaborative and early intervention approach

to behavioural problems does make a difference for

teachers, parents and the children themselves by getting

them on a more positive life trajectory.

References

AACAP. (2007). Practice parameter for the assessment and

treatment of children and adolescents with oppositional

defiant disorder.

American Academy of Child and Adolescent

Psychiatry

,

46

(1), 126–140.

AACAP. (2009). Oppositional defiant disorder: A guide for

families by the American Academy of Child and Adolescent

Psychiatry. Retrieved 24 March 2009 from http://www.

aacap.org/galleries/eAACAP.ResourceCenters/ODD_guide.pdf

Brann, P, Corboy, D., Costin, J., McDonald, J., Hayes, L.,

& Turner, M. (2007). An evaluation of an early intervention

approach to disruptive behaviours in primary school children:

Kool Kids, Positive Parents (KKPP) and CAMHS and Schools

Together (CAST). Melbourne: Eastern Health. Unpublished

report for the Mental Health Branch Victoria.

Goodman, R. (2001). The Strengths and Difficulties

Questionnaire. Retrieved 7 Nov. 2005 from http://www.

youthinmind.net/Aus/

Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (1990).

The social skills

rating system

. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.

Partridge, A. (2009).

Evaluation of an early intervention

program for childhood conduct problems

. Unpublished

doctoral dissertation, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.

Webster-Stratton, C., & Reid, M. J. (2003). Treating

conduct problems and strengthening social and emotional

competence in young children: The Dina Dinosaur Treatment

program.

Journal of Emotional and Behavioural Disorders

,

11

(3), 130–143.

Table 3. KKPP parent group

Session Topic/area

1

Understanding child behaviour

Quality time

2

Giving effective commands, behaviour management (use

of praise and ignoring)

3

Active listening – tuning into your child

4

Incentive planning – how do we promote more positive

behaviour?

5

Managing misbehaviour

6

Helping children to manage their emotions

7

Helping children develop social skills

8

Building positive school/home relationships

Suzanne Lim

has worked in CAMHS for around 20 years as well as

in private practice, education settings and overseas. She is currently

the team manager of the Kool Kids Positive Parents program, a CAMHS

in Schools Early Action (CASEA) program, which provides early

intervention and prevention for children with behavioural difficulties.

Correspondence to:

Suzanne Lim

Team Manager, Kool Kids Positive Parents

Senior Clinician Speech Pathologist

Eastern Health Child and Adolescent Mental Health (CAMHS)

C/- 19 Grey Street, East Ringwood, Victoria, 3135

email:

Suzanne.Lim@easternhealth.org.au

behaviour, an individualised focus might include further parent or

teacher interviews, pupil support group meeting to discuss

specific issues, referrals for additional assessments or the

setting up of a positive behaviour plan. Representatives from

all schools are invited to training in functional behavioural

assessments and development of a positive behaviour plan

for children with particularly challenging behaviour.

KKPP has time-limited involvement with each school. All

parents who are involved with the targeted component receive

written and verbal feedback with recommendations. To aid

sustainability, schools are provided with the training and materials

to implement the programs for a second time without KKPP

clinical staff (who are available on a consultant basis).

Outcomes

Both qualitative and quantitative evaluation of KKPP was

completed on data collected from the 32 schools concerning

220 children and their parents who were involved at the

targeted level of intervention, from mid 2004 to the end of

2006. The children were mainly boys from grades 1 and 2,

who had high levels of conduct problems compared to their

peers, with teachers rating more than 70% of these children

as being in the clinical range.

Analysis of parent and teacher SDQ data found significant

decreases in children’s problems following the group

interventions, with improvements on all scales, i.e., children’s

overall difficulties, emotional problems, conduct problems,

hyperactivity, peer problems and prosocial behaviours. The

percentage of children who were in the clinical range on the

SDQ fell from 75% to 53% according to teachers. Analysis

of the Social Skills Rating Scale Gresham & Elliott, 1990)

found statically significant improvements in social skills and

academic competence as well as significant reductions in

problem behaviour according to both teacher and parent

reports (Brann et al, 2007). Results also indicated that

parents had a greater sense of competency and satisfaction

following the program and had become less verbose, lax

and over-reactive (Brann et al., 2007). Long-term follow up

showed that these improvements in parents and children

were sustained up to 6 to 18 months post program delivery

(Partridge, 2009).

Analysis of feedback questionnaires from education

staff, parents, children and co-facilitators indicated that

satisfaction with the programs was high and the strategies

introduced were valued. The group activities were popular

with the small Kool Kids group as well as the whole class

and the use of puppets made an enormous difference in

engaging the children. “Sam” – a large boy puppet – rapidly

became the KKPP mascot!