AOACRIGlutenMethods-2017Awards

110  H albmayr -J ech et al . : J ournal of AOAC I nternational V ol . 98, N o . 1, 2015

Lab Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 Sample 5 Sample 6 Sample 7 Sample 8 Sample 9 Sample 10 Sample 11 Sample 12 A 0, 7 0, 3 14, 1 18, 3 21, 4 23, 1 107, 5 115, 5 –1, 1 0, 1 4, 6 4, 7 12, 4 10, 1 61, 0 59, 5 2, 5 3, 2 12, 0 13, 7 26, 5 24, 9 92, 1 109, 9 D 1, 1 3, 6 18, 5 17, 6 39, 8 53, 9 150, 5 162, 8 0, 9 0, 3 9, 3 7, 1 16, 2 17, 3 121.4 b 120.7 b 5, 8 3, 7 16, 8 18, 2 45, 0 41, 6 154, 5 159, 7 E 0, 4 0, 6 17, 7 14, 7 19, 1 48, 6 149, 1 177, 6 0, 9 –1, 2 6, 7 6, 1 12, 6 15, 9 79, 7 78, 5 0, 3 0, 5 11, 8 11, 0 17, 8 19, 9 102, 0 104, 9 F 0, 2 0, 4 11, 4 15, 6 19, 2 10, 2 58, 1 71, 2 0, 0 –2, 1 5, 3 5, 4 12, 1 10, 9 71, 2 62, 3 6, 7 2, 0 12, 0 9, 1 18, 8 18, 4 86, 7 79, 3 G 1, 2 0, 8 9, 1 14, 6 27, 3 26, 3 76, 7 70, 4 0, 5 –0, 9 7, 2 4, 9 12, 0 11, 6 52, 2 55, 4 4, 0 3, 0 13, 5 13, 8 22, 2 27, 0 103, 6 86, 5 H –0, 2 –0, 3 7, 7 7, 2 12, 6 14, 1 64, 2 60, 8 0, 7 0, 3 5, 3 6, 1 11, 9 13, 1 60, 4 59, 9 0, 7 0, 6 9, 1 8, 9 17, 3 16, 4 73, 8 66, 3 I 2, 0 2, 8 15, 6 12, 9 22, 7 19, 0 81, 5 78, 0 –1, 3 1, 9 3, 9 7, 1 10, 1 11, 7 51, 1 39, 0 5, 5 4, 9 15, 2 15, 0 39, 3 26, 2 65, 8 100, 4 K 6, 7 5, 6 15, 7 15, 5 38, 7 29, 9 85, 6 76, 0 0, 4 –0, 8 4, 3 4, 5 8, 9 11, 2 40, 1 39, 4 13.5 b 14.6 b 26, 0 23, 3 36, 4 36, 8 158, 4 114, 6 L 8.9 c 0.5 c 22, 0 17, 5 38, 3 56, 8 120, 5 143, 2 2, 9 –1, 7 9, 8 9, 1 12, 9 15, 1 66, 2 75, 4 3, 0 4, 7 13, 4 17, 2 34, 9 21, 4 118, 5 175, 7 M 3, 9 3, 5 18, 5 17, 7 20, 3 38, 9 99, 6 81, 4 0, 6 –0, 4 5, 3 7, 6 15, 5 13, 6 70, 3 78, 8 6, 9 11, 1 21, 3 19, 7 16, 9 21, 1 154, 6 90, 3 N 1, 7 4, 7 9, 7 12, 7 18, 9 15, 0 145, 0 111, 6 0, 1 0, 9 4, 5 3,8 9,6 9,5 45,5 52,0 4,8 10,9 11,1 10,4 20,6 23,8 102,1 90,5 O 1,3 1,9 15, 9 7, 4 26, 2 36, 2 124, 5 95, 6 0.3 c 1.5 c 6, 8 4, 9 18, 7 13, 9 73.6 c 108.7 c 4, 4 1, 6 19, 3 15, 3 26, 7 27, 5 144, 8 142, 8

Sample ID a

P –0, 6 1, 1 7, 7 11, 1 14, 5 14, 2 74, 1 74, 5 0, 5 0, 1 7, 5 7, 0 13, 7 12, 7 71, 3 66, 1 6, 6 3, 5 12, 0 16, 4 22, 9 18, 7 75, 7 70, 8 Q 0, 3 0, 6 12, 6 10, 3 18, 9 13, 7 114, 9 108, 1 –0, 7 –1, 2 5, 3 6, 6 12, 1 13, 2 67, 7 69, 7 2, 5 2, 3 12, 6 11, 3 23, 2 20, 3 112, 9 99, 8 R 3, 3 3, 6 11, 3 15, 2 25, 2 32, 2 139, 4 93, 1 0, 3 0, 1 6, 5 6, 4 14, 1 12, 8 72, 6 70, 5 6, 4 6, 6 19, 3 19, 1 46, 0 38, 9 178, 5 152, 9 S 0, 8 1, 0 9, 9 7, 6 31, 9 17, 9 92, 3 58, 7 0, 9 0, 3 5, 7 3, 8 10, 8 10, 3 44, 1 55, 1 1, 3 2, 0 12, 4 11, 9 28, 6 18, 2 109, 2 60, 7 T –1, 1 –1, 4 10, 1 9, 3 21, 0 22, 7 95, 2 77, 8 0, 2 0, 1 6, 6 4, 6 14, 2 14, 2 71, 8 76, 9 1, 7 1, 1 9, 8 10, 6 19, 8 20, 0 109, 7 129, 0 U 2, 5 2, 8 16, 4 17, 7 26, 5 29, 0 97, 0 109, 4 –2.28 b –2.74 b 11, 0 7, 8 17, 3 17, 9 76, 9 91, 2 4, 6 8, 4 19, 6 22, 7 33, 4 41, 4 139, 6 141, 3 a  1 = Gluten-free rice flour; 2 = rice flour 10 mg gluten/kg; 3 = rice flour 20 mg gluten/kg; 4 = rice flour 100 mg gluten/kg; 5 = gluten-free chocolate cake; 6 = chocolate cake 10 mg gluten/kg; 7 = chocolate cake 20 mg gluten/kg; 8 = chocolate cake 100 mg gluten/kg; 9 = crisp bread 4.5 mg gluten/kg; 10 = crisp bread 15 mg gluten/kg; 11 = crisp bread 24 mg gluten/kg; and 12 = crisp bread 102 mg gluten/kg. b  Grubbs outlier. c  Cochran outlier.

Table 7. Individual results from interlaboratory study for gluten by AgraQuant Gluten G12 Sandwich ELISA (results are stated as mg gluten/kg). Outliers determined with Cochran and the Grubbs test are marked in bold font and highlighted in grey. Laboratory B did not return a result sheet in time. Result sheets of laboratories C and J could not be used