2014-VP4-ZON-EN

 describes the product evaluation of the improvement plan  describes the process evaluation of the improvement plan  describes the prescribed procedures that have been taken into account  describes the legal guidelines that have been taken into account Foundation of the assessment of the work process with examples relating to the evaluation criteria.

Examiner’s name: (written in full in block letters ) …………………………………………

Function: Institution: □ Practical Vocational Training □ Training

Signature:

Examiner’s name: (written in full in block letters ) …………………………………………

Function: Institution: □ Practical Vocational Training □ Training

Signature:

Total amount of points WP 2.2 add up only if there are no unsatisfactory marks

..

Cutting score All of the evaluation criteria have been evaluated as satisfactory or better Standardisation Good: ≥ 18 points Satisfactory: All criteria have been evaluated as satisfactory or better Unsatisfactory: One or more criteria have been evaluated as unsatisfactory Evaluation of work process 2.2 Works on the promotion and safeguarding of quality care (tick where appropriate)

 This work process has been evaluated as good

 This work process has been evaluated as satisfactory

 This work process has been evaluated as unsatisfactory

Examinee’s name: (written in full in block letters ) …………………………………………

Signature (seen):…………………………………………

Stichting Consortium Beroepsonderwijs Z&W series 2014 Training: Nurse 2014-vp-4-e4