2014-VP4-ZON-EN

 explains how the supervision style is in keeping with the student’s options and learning style  explains the advice and instruction skills she has applied and the effects this has had  explains the feedback skills she has applied and the effects this has had  explains the work supervision methodologies she has applied and the effects this has had Foundation of the assessment of the work process with examples relating to the evaluation criteria.

Examiner’s name: (written in full in block letters ) …………………………………………

Function:

Institution: □ Practical Vocational Training □ Training

Signature:

Examiner’s name: (written in full in block letters ) …………………………………………

Function: Institution: □ Practical Vocational Training □ Training

Signature:

Total amount of points WP 2.3 add up only if there are no unsatisfactory marks

..

Cutting score All of the evaluation criteria have been evaluated as satisfactory or better. Standardisation Good: ≥ 22 points Satisfactory: All criteria have been evaluated as satisfactory or better Unsatisfactory: One or more criteria have been evaluated as unsatisfactory Evaluation of work process 2.3 Provides work supervision (tick where appropriate)

 This work process has been evaluated as good

 This work process has been evaluated as satisfactory

 This work process has been evaluated as unsatisfactory

Stichting Consortium Beroepsonderwijs Z&W series 2014

7

Training: nurse 2014-vp-4-e5