IRE Statistical Compilation 2019

Percent distribution of library collection, by material type: Fiscal Year 2017

Image description. HorizontalBar chartwith 2 items. X scale titledFTE students perFTE instructional staff. Y scale titledScale label. Item1,Your institution 21. Item2,ComparisonGroupMedian (N=18) 17. Shape line,Label: Shape InstitutionLegend, Label:Your institution Shape ComparisonGroupLegend, Label:ComparisonGroupMedian (N=18) End of image description.

Image description. Material type HorizontalBar chartwith 7 groupswith 2 items per group. X scale titledPercent of library collection. Y scale titledScale label. Group 1,Physical books. Item 1,Your institution 98. Item 2,ComparisonGroupMedian (N=18) 15. Group 2,Digital/Electronic books. Item 1,Your institution 0.01. Item 2,ComparisonGroupMedian (N=18) 63. Group 3,Physicalmedia. Item 1,Your institution 2. Item 2,ComparisonGroupMedian (N=18) 1. Group 4,Digital/Electronicmedia. Item 1,Your institution 0.01. Ite 2,ComparisonGroupMedian (N=18) 0.01. Group 5,Physical serials. Item 1,Your institution 0.01. Ite 2,ComparisonGroupMedian (N=18) 0.01. Group 6,Digital/Electronic serials. Item 1,Your institution 0.01. Item 2,ComparisonGroupMedian (N=18) 3. Group 7,Databases. Item 1,Your institution 0.01. Item 2,ComparisonGroupMedian (N=18) 0.01. Shape line, Label: Shape InstitutionLegend, Label:Your institution Shape ComparisonGroupLegend, Label:ComparisonGroupMedian (N=18) End of image description.

Material type

98

Physical books

15

0

Digital/Electronic books

63

21

2

Physical media

Student-to-faculty ratio

1

17

0 0

Digital/Electronic media

0 0

Physical serials

0

Digital/Electronic serials

3

0 0

Databases

0

5

10

15

20

25

FTE students per FTE instructional staff

0

20

40

60

80

100

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=18) NOTE: Student-to-faculty ratio data are presented only for institutions that have undergraduate students; graduate only institutions are not included. For details, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2018, Fall Enrollment component.

Percent of library collection

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=18) NOTE: N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2018, Academic Libraries component.

Figure 39. Percent distribution of library expenses, by function: Fiscal Year 2017

Image description. Function HorizontalBar chartwith 6groupswith 2 items per group. X scale titledPercentof library expenses. Y scale titledScale label. Group 1,Salaries andwages. Item1,Your institution 87. Ite 2,ComparisonGroupMedian (N=18) 60. Group 2,Fringe benefits. Item1,Your institution 0.01. Item2,ComparisonGroupMedian (N=18) 18. Group 3,One-time purchases. Item1,Your institution 4. Ite 2,ComparisonGroupMedian (N=18) 5. Group 4,Ongoing commitments to subscriptions. Item1,Your institution 1. Item2,ComparisonGroupMedian (N=18) 6. Group 5,Othermaterials/services. Item1,Your institution 0.01. Ite 2,ComparisonGroupMedian (N=18) 0.01. Group 6,Operations andmaintenance. Item1,Your institution 8. Item2,ComparisonGroupMedian (N=18) 5. Shape line,Label: Shape InstitutionLegend, Label:Your institution Shape ComparisonGroupLegend, Label:ComparisonGroupMedian (N=18) End of image description. Function

87

Salaries and wages

60

0

Fringe benefits

18

4

One-time purchases

5

1

Ongoing commitments to subscriptions

6

0 0

Other materials/services

8

Operations and maintenance

5

0

20

40

60

80

100

Percent of library expenses

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=18) NOTE: N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2018, Academic Libraries component.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT

14

East Central Community College

METHODOLOGICAL NOTES