2018 - March 12 SPSFAM Meeting Book
Open and start reading right away!
Stakeholder Panel for STRATEGIC FOOD ANALYTICAL METHODS (SPSFAM)
MONDAY, MARCH 12, 2018 GAITHERSBURG MARRIOTT WASHINGTONIAN CENTER 9571 Washingtonian Blvd, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878 CONFERENCE ROOM: Salon C/D/E
1:00pm – 5:00pm Eastern Time Registration Opens at 12:00Pm
CONTACT: SPSFAM@AOAC.ORG
Stakeholder Panel for STRATEGIC FOOD ANALYTICAL METHODS (SPSFAM)
MONDAY, MARCH 12, 2018 GAITHERSBURG MARRIOTT WASHINGTONIAN CENTER 9571 Washingtonian Blvd, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878 CONFERENCE ROOM: Salon C/D/E
1:00pm – 5:00pm Eastern Time Registration Opens at 12:00Pm
CONTACT: SPSFAM@AOAC.ORG
Stakeholder Panel on Strategic Food Analytical Methods - Chair Biography
Co‐Chair, SPSFAM Erik Konings Nestle Research Center Erik Konings studied higher professional laboratory education with majors in analytical and clinical chemistry. After graduating in 1984, he started his professional career at the then called Food Inspection Service in Maastricht, the Netherlands. In 2001 he completed his PhD study “Dietary folates in human nutrition” at Maastricht University. During this study, he obtained an MSc-degree in epidemiology. He is (co)author of more than 30 scientific publications. In September 2008 he started at the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) in Parma, Italy, for a secondment as Scientific Officer at the Data Collection and Exposure Unit, and from there accepted, in June 2009, a position at the Nestlé Research Centre in Lausanne, Switzerland, currently in a role as Food Safety & Quality expert. He is active in several Standard Developing Organisations as AOAC INTERNATIONAL (Past-President), ISO, CEN, and IDF, and participates in the Codex Committee on Methods of Analysis and Sampling (CCMAS).
PRESENTER BIOS
SUSAN AUDINO, Audino & Associates, LLC Chair, Cannabis Working Group
Susan Audino obtained her PhD in Chemistry with an analytical chemistry major, physical and biochemistry minor areas. Susan was the recipient of NSF Chemometric Graduate Fellowship and was a visiting scientist at NIST where she completed her graduate research. She currently owns and operates a consulting firm to service chemical and biological laboratories, is an A2LA Lead Assessor and Instructor, and serves as a Board Member for the Center for Research on Environmental Medicine in Maryland. She is also serving as Quality Director for several laboratories and has worked with a
variety of laboratories to establish and/or improve their quality management systems.
Susan has been studying the chemistry and applications of cannabinoids and provides scientific and technical guidance to medical marijuana dispensaries, testing laboratories, medical personnel, and regulatory agencies. Dr. Audino’s interest most directly involves marijuana/cannabis consumer safety and protection, and promotes active research towards the development of Official Test methods specifically for this industry. In addition to serving on Expert Review Panels, she has been working closely with AOAC to develop interest and movement toward the development of scientifically sound methodologies for the cannabis sector. Prior to her study of chemistry, Dr. Audino received advanced degrees and practiced psychology for more than a decade.
JOE BOISON, Independent Consultant Chair, Veterinary Drugs Working Group
Dr. Boison recently retired from the Canadian Public Service after 31 years of public service. He still holds 2 Adjunct Professor Faculty positions in the College of Graduate Studies at the University of Saskatchewan. In 2003, he was appointed a Fellow of the World Innovation Foundation, was awarded the CFIA President’s National Award for Leadership Excellence in 2010, and in 2012 he was appointed a fellow of the AOACI. In 2017, he was appointed a senior member of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA); He was the winner of the 2015 AOAC Harvey W. Wiley Award, the recipient of the 2015 Expert Review Panel (ERP) Award for chairing the Pesticide Residues and Chemical Contaminants in Tea ERP and is currently chair of the AOAC gluten in oats initiative.
Dr. Boison is a member of the Spectroscopy Society of Canada, a member of the Standards and Measurement Committee for the American Society for Mass Spectrometry (ASMS), a member of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, member of the AOAC Editorial Board, the Scientific Editor for Veterinary Drugs, joint scientific editor for Drug Formulations and Clinical Methods for the Journal of AOAC International, Vice Chair of the AOAC Official Methods Board and Chair of the AOAC Research Institute Board of Directors.
As a consultant, Dr. Boison is regularly consulted within and outside government and the industry with regards to residue testing methods for in-plant and on-farm use. Dr. Boison’s research and academic interests during his tenure in the public service included development of chromatographic and mass spectrometric methods for the detection, identification and confirmation of veterinary drug residues in biological fluids and tissues in support of regulatory enforcement and/or for the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies; development and adaptation of commercially available rapid tests for field and lab screening of drug residues in biological fluids and tissues; automation of laboratory methods for the analysis of veterinary and human drugs; and teaching/development of graduate and undergraduate students to acquire expertise in bio- analytical mass spectrometry, metabolism, and pharmacokinetic studies.
JOHN SZPYLKA, Mérieux NutriSciences Co-Chair, Sugars Working Group
Dr. John Szpylka is the Scientific Affairs Director, Chemistry N.A. with Mérieux NutriSciences where he manages nutritional analytical method development for Mérieux NutriSciences and is a technical leader for chemistry testing in North America. John is a representative to key scientific organizations and regulatory agencies to identify and contribute to food testing standardization for nutritional needs and arising issues. This includes active involvement in organizations including AOACI, AACCI, AOCS, AAFCO, ACIL, and DSQAP. John Szpylka is a Fellow of AOAC International and is a past chair of the AOAC Official Methods Board . He currently serves on numerous Stakeholder Panels and Expert Review
Panels. John also serves as a Board Member for the American Council of Independent Laboratories. Before joining Mérieux NutriSciences, John was a Principal Scientist with General Mills / Medallion Laboratories where he oversaw the development and operation of food analytical methods. John received his doctorate in analytical chemistry from the Ohio State University after receiving a B.S. in chemistry from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
NANCY THIEX, Thiex Laboratory Solutions, LLC. Co-Chair, Sugars Working Group Thiex retired in 2011 after 35 years of service to South Dakota State University, where she managed an Analytical Services Laboratory. Since “retirement” Thiex has provided technical consulting as Thiex Laboratory Solutions LLC. She continues to be active in AAFCO and AOAC and other professional organizations, serving on many working groups, committees and task forces. Two of these volunteer efforts include co-chairing the AAFCO Laboratory Methods and Services Committee and serving as a section editor for JAOAC.
A significant work effort over the past five years has been contributing to the three-association cooperative agreement "Building an Integrated Laboratory System to Advance the Safety of Food and Animal Feed" funded by US FDA. In this effort lead by APHL, she serves as the AAFCO Lead Investigator and Project Manager. She is proud to have been able to contribute to the many valuable deliverables of this collaboration of FDA, APHL, AFDO and AAFCO.
SPSFAM Roster as of March 6, 2018
SPSFAM Roster, March 6, 2018 This roster is also the SPSFAM Mailing List! Don’t see your name on the list? Please let us know by emailing SPSFAM@aoac.org and we will add you right away to make sure you don’t miss any important announcements! Full Name Position Organization Erik J. M. Konings Chair Nestle Research Center Vanessa Abercrombie Member Agilent Technologies, Inc. Luke K. Ackerman, PhD Member FDA/CFSAN Claude Pierre Aebischer Member DSM Nutritional Products Ltd David James Almy, M.S. Member Neogen Corporation Mark Angerhofer Member TruSource Patricia Atkins Member SPEX CertiPrep Susan Audino Member Audino & Associates, LLC Lauryn Bailey Member SCIEX Charles A. Barber Member NIST Brad Barrett Member Forrest L. Bayer Member Coca‐Cola Co. Nizar Benismail Member Nestle Research Center Phil Berrier Member The Coca‐Cola Company Tim Beshore Member Chemours Sneh D. Bhandari Member Merieux NutriSciences Joe Boison Member Emma Bradley Member FERA Hillel Brandes Member MilliporeSigma Roger M. Brauninger Member A2LA Michelle Briscoe Member Brooks Applied Labs Paula N. Brown Member British Columbia Institute of Technology Carolyn Quarles Burdette Member NIST Nicole Burke Member Kellogg Company Justin Burmeister Member Applied Technical Services, Inc. Jeannie Buscher Member Buchi Kombucha Anton Bzhelyansky Member US Pharmacopeia (USP) Jim Cali Member Promega Corporation Esther Campos‐Gimenez Member Nestle Research Center Xu‐Liang Cao Member Health Canada Evan Chaney Member Diamond V Tony Chang Member International Chemistry Testing Mr. Niladri Sekhar Chatterjee Member Indian Agricultural Research Institute Mike Clark Member Bio‐Rad Laboratories
SPSFAM Roster as of March 6, 2018
Robert Clifford. Alessandra Conte Claudio Cornaggia
Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member
Shimadzu
Mérieux NutriSciences
Megazyme
Tim Croley
US FDA ‐ CFSAN Monster Energy
Patrick Crook
Erin Sutphin Crowley
Q Laboratories, Inc.
Hannah Crum
Kombucha Brewers International
David Cunningham
Cunningham Consulting Millennium Products, Inc. Mérieux Nutriscience
GT Dave
Emiliano De Dominicis Jonathan W. DeVries, Sr. Carmen Diaz‐Amigo Ms. Jennifer Donelson
Retired
FOCOS GbR
Petroleum Analyzer Company (PAC)
Jennifer Donelson Robert Donofrio
VUV Analytics
Neogen Corporation
Aurelie Dubois
International Dairy Federation
Lucien Duchateau Blake E. Ebersole
DSM Biotechnology Verdure Sciences
USDA ‐ FSIS ‐ Eastern Field Service Laboratory
Sarah Edwards Stefan Ehling
Abbott Nutrition
Katherine M. Evans Katherine Fiedler
Patriot Labs
U.S. FDA
Roland Franz
Fraunhofer
Christophe Fuerer
Nestle Research Center
Jodie Fung
Kombucha Brewers International
Andrew Fussell Eric A.E. Garber Ed George, III Kevin George Russell Gerads Peter Gibson Brendon D. Gill Michael Goodrich Ms. Qian F. Graves Keith Griswold, MA Jasmine Hagan, B.S. Cathy A. Halverson Heather L. Harris, J.D. Liwei Gu
PANalytical
US FDA
Eurofins
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
GW Research Ltd
Fonterra Co‐operative Group Ltd.
Cornerstone Labs
FDA ‐ CFSAN
Pepsico
USDA ARS
ELISA Technologies, Inc.
TTB
Nicole Hart
Agilent Technologies
Mr. Thomas Hartlein
Teledyne Tekmar
SPSFAM Roster as of March 6, 2018
Kevin Hegarty Norma R. Hill George Hodgin
Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member
Effendorf
US Treasury (Retired)
Biopharmaceutical Research Company
Douglas Lloyd Holt Gregory L. Hostetler
Dr Pepper Snapple Group Perrigo / PBM Nutritionals
Amy Howell Min Huang Ronald Hunter
Rutgers University
Frontage Laboratories, Inc.
Katherine C. Hyland Dorota Inerowicz
SCIEX
Office Of The Indiana State Chemist
Prashant Ingle
Maia Jack
American Beverage Association
Brian P. Jackson Greg Jaudzems
Dartmouth College
Nestle USA, Inc
National Institute Of Technology Rourkela
Rasu Jayabalan Holly E. Johnson Richard S. Jordan George Joseph David C. Kennedy
Alkemist Labs
Pacific Agricultural Laboratory AsureQuality, New Zealand
Phenomenex
Sam Khoury Soline Kintz
Cott Beverages, Inc. Red Bull North America National Food Agency
Barbro Inga Kristina Kollander
Joseph David Konschnik Julie A. Kowalski Mary Kay Krogull Christian C. Krueger
Restek Corporation
Trace Analytics
Eurofins
Complete Phytochemical Solutions Colorado Department of Public Health
Heather Krug Kevin Kubachka Scott Kuzdzal Karen L'Emperur Markus Lacorn
US FDA
Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc.
Industrial Labs R‐Biopharm AG
Alex LaGory
Kombucha Brewers International
Kristie Laurvick, MS
US Pharmacopeia (USP)
John Lawry
Covance
Soo‐Kwang Lee
FDA
Qi Lin
Abbott Nutrition R&D
Alex Liu
SCIEX
Haiyan Liu
Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc.
Bob Lockerman Robert Lockerman Daniel Lopez‐ferrer
CEM Corporation CEM Corporation Thermo Scientific
SPSFAM Roster as of March 6, 2018
CYNTHIA LUDWIG
Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member
AOCS
Lifu Ma
Certified Laboratories, Inc. The Coca‐Cola Company Friesland Campina Domo
Farzaneh Maniei, MS
Vicky Manti Eric Marceau
Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA)
Elaine Catherine Marley Christina Marrongelli
R‐Biopharm Rhone Ltd
Medical University of South Carolina
Katerina Mastovska Mary T. McBride. Barry V. McCleary
Covance Laboratories Agilent Technologies, Inc.
Megazyme
Katelin Merkh Josh Messerly
Lassonde Pappas
Eurofins Nutrition Analysis Center Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. Mindak Professional Services, LLC Alcohol & Tobacco Tax & Trade Bureau
Paul Milne
William Mindak Armen Mirzoian
Allen Misa
Phenomenex
Deepali Mohindra Linda Monaci Lisa Monteroso Elizabeth Mudge Cory J Murphy Gary D. Niehaus
Thermo Fisher Scientific
National Research Council Of Italy
3M Food Safety
BCIT
Canadian Food Inspection Agency Crystal Diagnostics ‐ NEOMED
Masayuki Nishimura, Sr.
Shimadzu
Gregory O. Noonan Maria Ofitserova
US FDA ‐ CFSAN
Pickering Laboratories, Inc.
Oliver Ou
USDA FSIS LQAD
Vincent Paez
SCIEX
Arun Paga
Eurofins Central Analytical Lab
Christine Parker
FDA
George Stanley Penson
Cott Beverages
Quang Son Pham
Abbott
Melissa Meaney Phillips
NIST
Tom Phillips Tom Phillips Tom Phillips
MD Department Of Agriculture MD Department Of Agriculture MD Department Of Agriculture
Curtis S. Phinney
Curtis S. Phinney, CNS Nestle Research Center
Eric Poitevin Bert Popping
FOCOS ‐ Food Consulting Strategically
Rick Reba Jess Reed Klaus Reif
Nestle USA, Inc.
University of Wisconsin‐Madison
PhytoLab GmbH & Co., KG
SPSFAM Roster as of March 6, 2018
John Reuther Amanda Rigdon
Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member
Eurofins Central Analytical Lab
Emerald Scientific
Catherine A. Rimmer Shauna F. Roman
NIST
Capstone Nutrition Waters Corporation SC Laboratories, Inc. Abbott Laboratories
Joe Romano
Travis Ruthenburg Louis M. Salvati, M.S.
Andre Santos
Agilent Technologies, Inc. Atlantic Test Labs, Inc.
Timothy Schnupp Andre Schreiber Brooke Schwartz
SCIEX
Rheonix Inc.
Carl Schwarz Jenny Scifres
SCIEX
USDA FSIS OPHS LQAD ALP
Jennifer Sealey‐Voyksner
ImmunogenX
Tom Seipelt
Abbott Nutrition
Jeffrey Shippar Kevin Shores
Covance Laboratories
Valspar Neogen
Amanda Kay Simon Christopher Smith Aniko M. Solyom Kasi V. Somayajula Katherine Stenerson Cheryl Stephenson.
The Coca‐Cola Company
GAAS Analytical
The Coca‐Cola Company
MilliporeSigma
Eurofins Central Analytical Laboratory
Joan Stevens
Agilent Technologies Coca‐Cola Company Covance Laboratories
Rachel Stryffeler
Mr. Darryl M. Sullivan
Julie Sundgaard
ROMER Labs Inc
Alan Sutton
GW Pharmaceuticals
Christian Sweeney
Cannabistry Labs
John Szpylka
Mérieux NutriSciences Perrigo Nutritionals
Steve Tennyson
Nancy Thiex
Thiex Laboratory Solutions LLC LATU ‐ Chromatography And Mass Spectrometry Department
Marina Graciela Torres Rodriguez
John Travis Daina Trout Justin Trout
NSF International Health‐Ade LLC
Health‐Ade Kombucha
Socrates Trujillo Tomasz Tuzimski
US FDA
Medical University Of Lublin
Harrie Van Den Bijgaart Jolanta Vidugiriene Sue (Shuimei) Wang
Qlip BV
Promega
ITRI
SPSFAM Roster as of March 6, 2018
Wayne Wargo Ms. Jane Weitzel
Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member
Abbott Nutrition Biovail Corporation
Walter Brent Wilson
NIST SCIEX
Paul Winkler Seth Wong Laura Wood
TEQ Analytical Labs
NIST
Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, USDA‐ARS Archer Daniels Midland Company
Xianli Wu
Jason Lynn Wubben
Joshua Wurzer
SC Labs
Sudhakar Yadlapalli
First Source Laboratory Solutions LLP
Charles Yang
Thermo Scientific Nestle Nutrition
Jupiter M. Yeung.
Hong You
Eurofins Scientific, Inc. Coca‐Cola Company
Chen Zhang
Shanghai Entry Exit Inspection And Quarantine Bureau
Yao Zhou
Patrick Martin Zoder, MS
PALL Corporation
Jerry Zweigenbaum
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
Scott G. Coates
AOAC Staff AOAC INTERNATIONAL
OMB Advisor
Florida Department Of Agriculture And Consumer Services
Jo Marie Cook
Christopher Dent Dawn L. Frazier Deborah McKenzie
AOAC Staff AOAC INTERNATIONAL AOAC Staff AOAC INTERNATIONAL AOAC Staff AOAC INTERNATIONAL
MARCH 12, 2018 GAITHERSBURG MARRIOTT WASHINGTONIAN CENTER 9751 WASHINGTONIAN BLVD., GAITHERSBURG, MD, 20878 Room: Salon C/D/E 1:00pm – 5:00pm ET Registration Opens at 12:00pm STAKEHOLDER PANEL ON STRATEGIC FOOD ANALYTICAL METHODS SPSFAM Chair: Erik Konings, Nestlé A G E N D A
Welcome and Introductions (1:00pm – 1:15pm) Jonathan Goodwin, AOAC and Erik Konings, Nestlé, SPSFAM Chair a. Policies and Procedures b. Approval of September 24, 2017 Minutes SPSFAM Activities Updates (1:15pm – 1:30pm) Erik Konings a. SPSFAM Expert Review Panel Updates
I.
II.
i. Allergens, Bisphenol-A, Cannabis, Heavy Metals, Kombucha, and Proanthocyanidins
III. SMPR Approval Presentations and Consensus* (1:30pm – 3:00pm) a. Sugar Working Group SMPR Presentations
John Szpylka, Mérieux NutriSciences and Nancy Thiex, Thiex Laboratory Solutions, LLC
Working Groups in Progress: Updates (3:15pm – 4:00pm) a. Cannabis Chair: Susan Audino, S.A. Audino & Associates b. Veterinary Drug Residues Chair: Joe Boison, University of Saskatchewan V. Future Topics of Interest for SPSFAM (4:00pm – 5:00pm) Group discussion about the need for additional standards across the industry.
IV.
a. Furan and Alkyl Furans in Coffee, Baby Foods, and Cereal Products b. Other Potential Topics
Adjourn (5:00pm)
VI.
Break: 3:00pm-3:15pm
*Item requires a vote This agenda is subject to change without notice
V5 2/22/2018
AOAC INTERNATIONAL Stakeholder Panel on Strategic Food Analytical Methods Working Group Sessions – March 13, 2018 12:00 p.m., Salon G
I. SPSFAM Sugars Working Group (12:00 pm – 1:00 pm) Co-Chairs: John Szpylka, Mérieux NutriSciences and Nancy Thiex, Thiex Laboratory Solutions
1. Welcome and Introductions 2. Review of March 2 Meeting a. Action Items 3. Low Lactose SMPR Development 4. Adjourn II. SPSFAM Veterinary Drugs Working Group (2:00 p.m. – 3:00 p.m.) Chair: Joe Boison, University of Saskatchewan 1. Welcome and Introductions 2. Review of Last Meeting a. Action Items 3. Veterinary Drug Residues SMPR Development 4. Adjourn
*Item requires a vote This agenda is subject to change without notice
V5 2/22/2018
AOAC Stakeholder Panel on Strategic Food Analytical Methods September 24, 2017, 8:00 a.m. – 1:30 p.m. ET Stakeholder Panel Meeting
STAKEHOLDER MEETING ATTENDEES ( present during all or part of the meeting ) Erik Konings, Nestlé (Chair) Bao Lei, Nestlé
Kathy Swartout, VUV Analytics John Szpylka, Mérieux NutriSciences Jing Tan, Abbott Nutrition Nancy Thiex, AAFCO Marina Torres, LATU Sherri Turnipseed, US FDA Harrie van den Bijgaat, Qlip BV Son Tran, National Institute for Food Control Jeroen van Soest, Eurofins Food Testing NL Martine vanGool, FrieslandCampina
Patricia Atkins, SpexCertiPrep
Han Li, China Alex Liu, SCIEX
Susan Audino, Audino & Associates LLC
Jacob Babu, MilkTestNZ
Lifu Ma, Certified Labs
Dongryeo Bae, US FDA/ORA/ARL
Ferry Maniei, The Coca-Cola Company Christina Marrongelli, Univ. of South Carolina Marla Marsh, Michigan Dept. of Agriculture Mary McBride, Agilent Technologies Patricia Meinhardt, R-Biopharm, Inc.
Charles Barber, US NIST Louis Bluhm, USDA FSIS
Joe Boison, CFIA
Hillel Brandes, MilliporeSigma Michele Bugayong, Abbott Nutrtion Esther Campos Gimenez, Nestlé Xu-Liang Cao, Health Canada Jo Marie Cook, Florida Dept of Agriculture Hans Cruijsen, FrieslandCampina Bob Clifford, Shimadzu
Josh Messerly, Eurofins
Paul Milne, Keurig Green Mountain
Tom Vennard, Covance Eric Verdon, ANSES
Armen Mirzoian, US TTB Brian Musselman, Ionsense
Ioannis Vrasidas, Eurofins Food Testing NL
Yasutaka Nishiyama, NH Foods Ltd. Maria Ofitserova, Pickering Laboratories Arun Paga, Eurofins Central Analytical Lab
Jian Wang, CFIA
Wayne Wargo, Abbott Nutrition Wade Whittington, Tyson Foods
Marcel de Vreeze, NEN-ISO Thierry Delatour, Nestlé
Melissa Phillips, US NIST
Paul Winkler, SCIEX Laura Wood, US NIST Jingcun Wu, Perkin Elmer
Khalil Divan, Thermo Fisher Scientific Jennifer Donnelson, VUV Analytics
Rick Reba, Nestlé
Klaus Reif, Phytolab GmbH & Co. KG
Aurelie Dubois, International Dairy Federation Lars Reimann, Eurofins
I-Lin Wu, US FDA
David Ellingson, Covance
John Reuther, Eurofins
Sudhakar Yadlapalli, First Source Laboratory
Tetsu Goto, CSC
Joe Romano, Waters Corporation Andre Santos, Agilent Technologies Brian Schaneberg, Starbuck Corporation Brook Schwartz, Rheonix, Inc. Tom Seipelt, Abbott Nutrition Keven Shores, Sherwin Williams Jayant Shringapure, Tyson Foods Kasi Somayajula, The Coca-Cola Company Angela Song, Abbott Nutrition Joan Stevens, Agilent Technologies Sidney Sudberg, Alkemist Labs Aniko Solyom, GAAS Analytical
Solutions
Cathy Halverson, US TTB
Charles Yang, Thermo Fisher Scientific Jinchuan Yang, Waters Corporation Zhou Yang, Eurofins Scientific, Inc. Michael Young, Waters Corporation Zhenfeng Yue, Shenzhen CIQ Zhiming Zhang Agilent Technologies
Philip Haselberger, Abbott Nutrition Thomas Hektor, R-Biopharm AG
Steve Holroyd, Fonterra
Ron Hunter, The Coca-Cola Company
Martha Jennens, Covance
Richard Jordan, Pacific Agricultural Laboratory Chris Smith, The Coca-Cola Company
Jie Zhang, Mead Johnson Linda Zhao, Abbott Nutrition
Brian Kirk, METTLER TOLEDO Estela Kneeteman, INTI
Hui Zhao, Covance Wei Zhu, Danone
Joseph Konschnik, Restek Corporation
Scott Krepich, Phenomenex
Garrett Zielinski, Covance
Mary Krogull, Eurofins Scientific, Inc. Hao Le, National Institute for Food Control
Donna Zink, AIM Research Enterprises, LLC
Darryl Sullivan, Covance
John Lee, Agilent Technologies
Hiroko Suzuki, Japan Food Research Laboratories
AOAC STAFF AND CONSULTANTS ( present during all or part of the meeting ) Scott Coates, Christopher Dent, Jennifer Diatz, Arlene Fox, Dawn Frazier, Jonathan Goodwin, Zerlinde Johnson, Deborah McKenzie, Tien Milor, Robert Rathbone,
Meeting Minutes I.
Welcome and Introductions
SPSFAM Chairman Erik Konings opened the meeting and led introductions at 8:05 am ET.
II.
SPSFAM Updates Konings asked for a motion to approve the meeting minutes from the March 13, 2017 SPSFAM Meeting Minutes. MOTION to approve the March 13, 2017 SPSFAM Meeting Minutes (Reba/Cook) 17 in favor, 0 opposed, 1 abstention. The motion passed. Konings then directed all participants to AOAC’s policies and procedures, advising that AOAC requires all participants to comply with the AOAC INTERNATIONAL Antitrust Policy Statement and Guidelines as well as all AOAC Policies and Procedures, found at www.aoac.org . He concluded his introduction with a presentation 1 regarding the status of SPSFAM and its various initiatives. a. Bisphenol-A (BPA) Konings then introduced Darryl Sullivan, Chair of the SPSFAM BPA Working Group. Sullivan took the floor with a presentation 2 describing the work of the BPA working group and a review of the background of BPA. Sullivan highlighted two comments that were submitted in response to the public comment period: • If the method is intended to measure free bisphenol A only then it should be stated as such. The phenolic groups of bisphenol A can react with beverage components (e.g. acids) to form esters, which are not captured unless they are first hydrolyzed. Response: Word “free” added to title • The phrase "grain-based dairy beverages" is sort of an oxymoron. If the beverages are grain- based they are not dairy, even though their name contains the word "milk". Response: Changed to “grain-based beverages.” Sullivan and Scott Coates reviewed these comments and determined that they could be added to the SMPR. Sullivan continued, explaining the method performance requirements set for this SMPR. After a brief discussion, a motion was made. SMPR Approval Presentations and Consensus
III.
1 SPSFAM Update Presentation (Konings) 2 SPSFAM BPA SMPR Approval Presentation (Sullivan)
MOTION to approve the Standard Method Performance Requirements ® for Determination of free Bisphenol A (BPA) in commercially packaged ready to consume carbonated and non- carbonated water and non-alcoholic beverages. (Szpylka/Yadlapalli). 17 in favor, 0 opposed, 1 abstention. The motion passed. 3 b. Cannabis in Chocolate Konings then introduced Susan Audino, Chair of the SPSFAM Cannabis Working Group. Audino took the floor with a presentation 4 on her group’s progress since the last meeting, primarily the development of an SMPR for Cannabis in Chocolate. The SMPR Consensus-based Reference method for use by trained technicians in a laboratory for routine quality assurance testing was put on screen and reviewed in detail. Numerous minor changes were made to the document. “Reference materials” was changed to “Examples of Reference Materials.” A link to the TDRM database was added under reference materials. A Shimadzu representative advised that they can also supply materials, so a reference to Shimadzu was also added under Reference Materials. After further discussion, a motion was made.
MOTION to accept the SMPR for Quantitation of Cannabinoids in Edible Chocolate Foods . 5 (Audino/Cook).
13 in favor, 0 opposed, 6 abstentions. The motion passed.
Audino concluded by updating the panel on the group’s progress on a pesticide residue SMPR. Audino explained that the SMPR is in progress and will be presented to SPSFAM for approval in March, 2018. Finally, Coates explained a memorandum 6 he and the working group had put together regarding the use of surrogate materials in cannabis testing. This memo applies to all Cannabis SMPRs developed to date.
IV.
Launch of New Working Groups a. Sugars
John Szpylka and Nancy Thiex. Co-Chairs of the sugars took the floor with their presentation 7 to launch the Sugars Working Group. The presentation proposed three separate fitness for purpose statements (leading to three SMPRs) for this project; one for sugars in animal feed, pet food, and human food; one for dietary fructan in animal feed, pet food and ingredients; and one for measuring lactose in dairy products. After some discussion and edits, the panel agreed to the following three fitness for purpose statements:
3 SPSFAM BPA SMPR as approved 9/24 4 SPSFAM Cannabis SMPR Presentation 5 SPSDAM Cannabis in Chocolate SMPR as approved 9/24 6 Coates Memo re: Cannabis Testing Materials 7 Launch Presentation: Sugar Working Group
1. Fitness for purpose for sugar: Individually measure free nutritional sugars, minimally: fructose, glucose, sucrose, maltose, lactose, and galactose found in ingredients and foods consumed by animals, pets, and humans. The analytical method must account for common interferences, such as sugar alcohols in these matrices. MOTION to accept the fitness for purpose as written (Thiex / Sudburg.) 17 in favor, 0 opposed, 2 abstentions. The motion passed. 2. Fitness for Purpose for Dietary Fructan in Animal Feed, Pet Food, and Ingredients: Measure total dietary fructan such as inulin and fructooligosaccharides in animal feed, pet food, and the corresponding ingredients. The method must distinguish this compound from interfering compounds such as free glucose, fructose, sucrose and other carbohydrates. MOTION to accept the fitness for purpose as written (Thiex / McCleary). 19 in favor, 0 opposed, 0 abstentions. The motion passed. 3. Lactose: Measure the amount of lactose in dairy products, including products containing daily ingredients that are low lactose or lactose-free. MOTION to accept (Szpylka / Yadlapalli), 19 in favor, 0 opposed, 0 abstentions. The motion passed. b. Veterinary Drugs Konings announced that Lei Bao of the AOAC China Section would start the discussion on veterinary drugs with a presentation. She reviewed the recent discussion on veterinary drugs at the last AOAC China section meeting, what is happening in China regarding vet drugs, and feedback of the Chinese stakeholders on this initiative, which was largely positive and emphasized the need for a method that can detect numerous pesticides. Joe Boison, Chair of the Veterinary Drugs Working Group, then took the floor with a presentation 8 to launch that group. Boison said the exact number of pesticides will be determined by the working group, but it will be at least 150. Boison then reviewed the background of the project, its significance, challenges and proposed timelines. He then recommended a fitness for purpose statement, which was discussed at length. The following wording was agreed to: The method should be applicable to the screening and identification of veterinary drugs (antibiotics, antiparasitics, anti-inflammatories & tranquilizers) in: ▪ raw milk, ▪ processed dairy powder ingredients (full-cream milk, fat-filled milk, skimmed milk, whey proteins, lactose, caseinate), ▪ meat including muscle, kidney, liver and fat (chicken, duck, turkey, beef, pork, lamb, veal), ▪ fish and seafood
▪ egg powders (whole, white and yolk), and ▪ infant formulae (regular and hydrolyzed). ▪ The method should be consistent with worldwide regulatory requirements.
8 Launch presentation: Veterinary Drugs
MOTION to accept the Veterinary Drug Residues fitness for purpose statement and launch the working group. (Boison/Audino) 20 in favor, 0 opposed, 0 abstentions. The motion passed. V. Adjourn
Konings thanked the stakeholders for their participation and adjourned the meeting at 1:00 pm ET.
Attachments:
1. SPSFAM Update Presentation
2. SPSFAM BPA SMPR Approval Presentation
3. SPSFAM BPA SMPR as approved 9/24
4. SPSFAM Cannabis SMPR Presentation
5. SPSFAM Cannabis in Chocolate SMPR as approved 9/24
6. Coates Memo re: Cannabis Testing Materials
7. Launch Presentation: Sugar Working Group
8. Launch presentation: Veterinary Drugs
These attachments are available upon request to SPSFAM@aoac.org
Status of SPSFAM First Action Official Methods of Analysis SM Expert Review Panels (ERPs)
Allergens ERP:- •
Detection and Quantitation of Selected Food Allergens ( AOAC SMPR 2016.002 ) o Two methods submitted, one method approved. o Call for Methods closed.
Bisphenol-A (BPA) ERP:- • Determination of Free Bisphenol-A in Commercially Packaged Ready to Consume Carbonated and Non-carbotated Water and Nonalcoholic Beverages ( AOAC SMPR 2017.018 )
o Four methods submitted, one method approved. o Accepting resubmissions from last ERP Meeting. o Call for Methods closed.
Cannabis ERP:- •
Quantitation of Cannabinoids in Plant Material ( AOAC SMPR 2017.001 ) o Two methods submitted, no methods approved. o Accepting resubmissions from last ERP meeting. o Call for Methods remains open. • Quantitation of Cannabinoids in Concentrates ( AOAC SMPR 2017.002 )
o One method submitted, no methods approved. o Accepting resubmissions from last ERP meeting. o Call for Methods open.
Heavy Metals ERP:- •
Quantitation of Arsenic Species in Food and Beverages ( AOAC SMPR 2015.006 ) o Five methods submitted, one method approved. o Call for Methods is closed. • Heavy metals in variety of foods and beverages ( AOAC SMPR 2012.07 ) o Six methods submitted, one method approved. o Call for Methods closed. Kombucha ERP:- • Determination of Ethanol in Kombucha ( AOAC SMPR 2016.001 )
o Eight methods submitted, two methods approved. o Accepting resubmissions from last ERP Meeting. o Call for Methods closed.
Proanthocyanidins (PAC) ERP:- •
Quantitation of Proanthocyanidin Content in Cranberry Products ( AOAC SMPR 2017.003) o Four methods submitted, no methods approved. o Accepting resubmissions from last ERP meeting. o Call for Methods remains open. • Identification of Type-A Proanthocyanidins in Cranberry Products ( AOAC SMPR 2017.004 )
o Two methods submitted, no methods approved. o Accepting resubmissions from last ERP Meeting. o Call for Methods open.
Watch the AOAC Website for these upcoming Calls for Methods!
• • •
• • •
Cannabis in Chocolate
Low Lactose Milk and Milk Products* Pesticide Residues in Cannabis* Veterinary Drug Residues in Food*
Sugars in Animal Feed, Pet Food, and Human Food* Fructans in Animal Feed, Pet Food, and Ingredients*
* Pending SMPR approval
AOAC STAKEHOLDER PANEL ON STRATEGIC FOOD ANALYTICAL METHODS
Sugar Working Group – SMPR Presentation March 13, 2018 Co‐Chairs:
John Szpylka, M é rieux NutriSciences Nancy Thiex, Thiex Laboratory Solutions
Marriott Washingtonian Center,Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
Fitness for Purpose As Agreed March 13, 2017
Fitness for purpose for sugar: Individually measure free nutritional sugars, minimally: fructose, glucose, sucrose, maltose, lactose, and galactose found in ingredients and foods consumed by animals, pets, and humans. The analytical method must account for common interferences, such as sugar alcohols in these matrices. Fitness for Purpose for Dietary Fructan in Animal Feed, Pet Food, and Ingredients: Measure total dietary fructan such as inulin and fructooligosaccharides in animal feed, pet food, and the corresponding ingredients. The method must distinguish this compound from interfering compounds such as free glucose, fructose, sucrose and other carbohydrates. Lactose: Measure the amount of lactose in dairy products, including products containing daily ingredients that are low lactose or lactose-free .
SPSFAM Sugar Working Group Work To Date
• 6 teleconferences (December 2017 – March 2018) • 2 SMPR Drafts Completed • Public comment period (February, 2018) • SMPRs made ready for SPSFAM review and approval
SPSFAM Sugar Working Group Members
Merieux NutriSciences
JohnSzpylka ASINALSAS Thermo Fisher
NancyThiex
Thiex LaboratorySolutions
BelisarioAcevedo
Douglas LloydHolt
Dr Pepper SnappleGroup
MariuszSliwinski Georgina Smyth Kathryn Stanley MoniqueSteegmans
Instytut Innowacji PrzemysluMleczarskiego Sp. zo.o.
Parul Angrish SeanAustin
JeffG.Horst
Agri‐King Inc
PublicAnalysts Laboratory
NestleResearchCenter
Martha Jennens Diana C.Kavolis Erik J.M.Konings DanaA.Krueger Markus Lacorn Cheryl L.Lassitter ScottKrepich
CovanceLaboratories TheHersheyCompany NestleResearchCenter
ArcherDanielsMidlandCompany
KnukErikBachKnudsen
Aarhus University
TienseSuikerraffnaderji Analytical Services
Charles A.Barber
NIST
Hiroko Suzuki Kathy Swartout
Japan FoodResearch Laboratories
Daniel Berg
Covance
Phenomenex
VUVAnalytics
SnehD.Bhandari Sharon L.Brunelle
MerieuxNutriSciences
Krueger Food Laboratories, Inc.
NaimTahiri
Birra Peja
AOAC INTERNATIONAL (Contractor)
R‐BiopharmAG
Richard Ten Eyck
AAFCO
KaitlinCahill JaneCaldwell
Q Laboratories, Inc. MidwestLaboratories DanoneResearch MaxxamAnalytics
NOAA ‐DOC,NMFS,NSIL
Rodriguez
LATU ‐ChromatographyAndMass SpectrometryDepartment
Sookwang Lee
FDA
Peter J.Van Soest
Cornell University CovanceLaboratories
ChristianCampargue
Alex Liu Kai Liu
SCIEX
TomVennard
FranceCho
EurofinsNutritionAnalysis Center Roberta Vidal
Pepsico
MarkW.Collison
ArcherDaniels MidlandCompany BozenaD. Lusiak
NestlePurina
Hedegaard
IDF
Hans Cruijsen ManishaDas
FrieslandCampina
Eva Lynch
RockRiver Laboratory CovanceLaboratories
Ioannis Vrasidas Yannis Vrasidas
Eurofins Food TestingTheNetherlands Eurofins Food TestingNetherlands Medallion Labs /General Mills RWANDABUREAUOF STANDARDS
U.S.FDA
KaterinaMastovska BarryV.McCleary GastonM.Mercier
Marcel DeVreeze JenniferDonelson Dr.AurelieDubois
Institute (NEN) VUVAnalytics
Megazyme
PaulWehling
Canada
THEOWICLEFKAGISHA
International Dairy Federation UnileverResearchVlaardingen
PierreL.Metra
MerieuxNutriSciences
PaulWinkler RonaldWinter BryanWirthwine
SCIEX
Dr.GustaafS.Duchateau DavidEllingson,M.S.
LuciaMonti
CREA‐ZA
FDA
CovanceLaboratories Metrohm‐Peak, Inc
Hari Narayanan SalvatoreParisi
MetrohmUSA Inc
Q Laboratories, Inc.
Mr. JayGandhi
COIFAssociation, Italy MerieuxNutriSciences
DougWolfe LauraWood
McCoy&McCoy Laboratories, Inc.
Dr.FrankGottsleben JonathanHache Ms.GaleHagood MohamedHamad ThomasHektor RyanHoefling Dr.SteveHolroyd PhilipAndrewHaselberger
AntonPaarOptoTecGmbH
GiampaoloPerinello
NIST
Canadian Food InspectionAgency MelissaMeaneyPhillips
NIST
DavidC.Woollard Sudhakar Yadlapalli
EurofinsNewZealand Laboratories FirstSourceLaboratory Solutions LLP
Mississippi StateUniversity Microbac Laboratories Inc.
Miachael Raessler LarsM.Reimann CatherineA.Rimmer Alejandra Rodriguez
MPI Biochemie
Eurofins Scientific, Inc.
XunYan
AmwayCorp
AbbottNutrition R‐BiopharmAG
NIST
JinchuanYang
Waters Corporation
InternationalDairy Federation ZhengYang
Cargill
ICMTechDevelopment
JoeRomano
Waters Corporation
GuhongZhao
Northland Laboratories
Fonterra Co‐operativeGroup Ltd.
Sandra Salleres
BiolanMicrobiosensors
Background: Sugar
• For animal feeds, current sugar analyses typically rely on extraction, acid hydrolysis of solubilized carbohydrates, and measurement as reducing sugars, or measurement of total extracted carbohydrates using condensation reactions. – Inappropriately includes oligosaccharides and other solubilized carbohydrate in the sugar measurement. Also for some feeds, active amylases digest carbs into sugars thus artificially increasing the measured sugar amount. • For measuring individual sugars in foods, traditional HPLC methods have difficulty – separating some monosaccharides from each other, and – resolving sugars from interfering compounds such as sugar alcohols
Background: Sugar
• Currently there are no approved methods for individually measuring mono- and di-saccharides in animal feed or pet food. • RI methods do not achieve desired level for low level sugar guarantees. • AOAC Official Method 974.06 Sugars (Total) in Animal Feed Modified Fehling Solution Method • Several issues on accounting for different sugars being present
Sugar SMPR Key Points
Applicability • Individually measure free nutritional sugars, minimally: fructose, galactose, glucose, sucrose, maltose, and lactose found in selected ingredients and foods consumed by animals, pets, and humans. The analytical method must account for potential interferences (see list provided) in these matrices. Methods that target a narrower matrix scope will also be considered when appropriate.
Sugar SMPR Key Points
Potential Interferants • Non‐target mono, di‐ and tri‐ saccharides (e.g., maltotriose interfering with maltose) • Enzymatic activity (amylase, invertase) • Hydrolytic activity (e.g., acidic) • Organic acids • Glucose with higher degrees of polymerization • Sugar alcohols, such as: glycerol, erythritol, xylitol, sorbitol, mannitol, maltitol, lactitol, isomalt • Hydroxylated compounds (non‐targeted carbohydrates, sugar alcohols, sugar acids, sucralose, etc.) • Salts, such as sodium chloride • Amine containing compounds (glucosamine HCl, amino acids, peptides, glycoproteins, etc.)
Sugar SMPR Key Points
• Method data packages must include performance data covering the method claimed matrices. A useful tool can be found in food pyramid concept described in Annex F of Appendix F the AOAC Official Methods of Analysis. Matrix variations in non‐sugar carbohydrate and moisture content must be investigated and data provided. For example, using the food pyramid in sector 7, a matrix may be either high in sugar or high in non‐sugar carbohydrates (e.g., starch, sugar alcohols), each of which may affect method performance. • Method data packages must include relevant data regarding interferences and instabilities.
Comments Submitted for Sugar SMPR
Comment
Response
There should be significant evaluation of the method for finished pet foods before it is accepted, to avoid significant problems with interferants. Otherwise, there are quite a few common ingredients in pet food which would cause interference. Can you please provide clarification in the SMPR if the method must be written to encompass all sugars in one?
SMPR states “Method data packages must include relevant data regarding interferences and instabilities”, and includes a list of classes of potential interents with clear examples. Recommend no change to SMPR . The SMPR implies a single method to measure the at least six free sugars. The working group agreed to a minimum set of six free sugars. Recommend no change to SMPR . The minimum number of sugars is clearly defined" . . . minimally: fructose, galactose, glucose,sucrose, maltose, and lactose . . .“. Recommend no change to SMPR .
SMPR should state somewhere that submission of methods that only cover a subgroup of sugars in selected matrices are also of interest.
Comments Submitted for Sugar SMPR
Comment
Response
Sample stability needs to be evaluated for extraction time (depending on solution) and also overall shelf life after extraction due to enzymes and microbial activities in these matrices.
A paragraph was added to Section 7. “Method data packages must include relevant data regarding interferences and instabilities, such as listed in Table 2. Data packages must include data to demonstrate that the sugar composition in the extract is a representation of the true sugar composition in the food product and assess the stability of extracts over the duration of the test.“
Comments Submitted for Sugar SMPR
Comment
Response
No change but an ERP should get some guidance when judging a method to be in accordance to this SMPR. Otherwise an endless discussion would occur which is not due to a non‐validated method but to an unclear SMPR. If a method developer submits a method for sucrose‐glucose‐fructose quantification in bread and Cookies, it is up to a method user if this "narrower matrix range" is appropriate or not. I am concerned that there is no section for reference materials in this SMPR.
1) If the submitted method is applicable only to a subset of foods or feeds, that information must be clearly described to allow ERP deliberation if the method satisfies Stakeholder needs. 2) As written, the minimum number of sugars that must be measured by a method is six regardless of the "narrower matrix scope" clause. Recommend no change to SMPR . This was an oversight by the working group. A reference material section was added as Section 8 and includes example Reference Materials Appendix F in OMA.
Method Performance Requirements: Sugar
Recovery, repeatability and reproducibility parameters * Analytical range 0.1% ‐ 5%
5 % ‐ 50 % 50 % ‐ 100%
Recovery, %
90 ‐ 110
95‐105
97 – 103
RSDr, %
≤7
≤5
≤3
RSDR, % ≤4 * Reported as the individual sugars (fructose, glucose, sucrose, maltose, lactose and galactose. ≤10 ≤8
Discussion?
Motion for Sugar SMPR
Move to approve the Standard Method Performance Requirements (SMPRs) for Sugars in Animal Feed, Pet Food, and Human Food
Background: Dietary Fructans
• Dietary fructan is water‐soluble class encompassing oligosaccharide and polysaccharide carbohydrates – Comprised predominantly of DP>3 fructose molecules and containing no more than one‐third glucose molecules. • This polymer of fructose molecules may or may not contain a terminal glucose molecule, and includes inulin and FOS. – Fructans are not digested by enzymes in the small intestine but can be fermented in the large intestine. • Nutritionally and compositionally distinct from other carbohydrates such as sugars, starch, and other forms of dietary fiber. • Primary sources of fructan are cool season grasses, chicory, and onions.
Background: Fructans
Currently two AOAC methods for fructan in foods (999.03 and 997.08); however, not fit-for-purpose for animal food. • Acid hydrolysis is more effective than use of inulinase (effective on inulin) for analysis of fructans in cool season grasses. • Hydrolysis of current methods may be modified for use in animal food
Fructans SMPR Key Points
Applicability • Measure total dietary fructan, such as inulin, levan, branched fructans, agavins (agave fructans) and fructooligosaccharides, in animal feed, pet food, and the corresponding ingredients. The method must be capable of distinguishing this compound from interfering compounds such free glucose, fructose, sucrose and other polysaccharides.
Fructans SMPR Key Points
Validation Guidance • Method data packages must include performance data covering the method claimed matrices. A useful tool can be found in food pyramid concept described in Annex F of Appendix F the AOAC Official Methods of Analysis. • Method data packages must include relevant data regarding interferences from other carbohydrates. Method developers are responsible for assessing interferences with their method.
Comments Submitted for Fructans SMPR
• A typo was corrected in the operating range and LOQ. Corrected to: • Operating range 0.2% ‐ 100 % (2g/kg to 1000 g/kg) of dry matter • Limit of quantitation (LOQ)* 0.2% (2g/kg) of dry matter
• No additional comments received.
Made with FlippingBook - Online magazine maker