Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  1018 / 1161 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 1018 / 1161 Next Page
Page Background

Recommendations for IMRT use

4)

Treatment related outcome

(local control, disease free survival,

overall survival) show not homogenous evidences

1. Mok G, Gauthier I, Jiang H, et al. Outcomes of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy for

hypopharyngeal cancer. Head Neck. United States; 2015;37:655–661.

2. Moon SH, Cho KH, Lee C-G, et al. IMRT vs. 2D-radiotherapy or 3D-conformal radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal

carcinoma: Survival outcome in a Korean multi-institutional retrospective study (KROG 11-06). Strahlentherapie und Onkol

Organ der Dtsch Rontgengesellschaft . [et al]. Germany; 2016;192:377–385.

3. Moretto F, Rampino M, Munoz F, et al. Conventional 2D (2DRT) and 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) versus

intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal cancer treatment. Radiol Med. Italy; 2014;119:634–641.

4. Marta GN, Silva V, De Andrade Carvalho H, et al. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck cancer :

Systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiother Oncol. Elsevier Ireland Ltd; 2014;110:9–15.