Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  35 / 68 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 35 / 68 Next Page
Page Background

33

SSC (Table 3). However, this characteristic

was associated with the mean fruit weight in

the ’G96-01’ ×

C. kinokuni

‘Mukaku kishu’

PI539530 segregating population, with fruit

from genotypes with enlarged neck having

an average weight of 90.7g in comparison

with their flush counterparts of 137.9g. Sim-

ilarly, fruit from genotypes with a neck had a

SSC of 9.7 in comparison with fruit with no

neck with an average SSC of 10.2. For all the

segregating populations SSC was not corre-

lated with fruit weight.

Conclusions

 In the pursuit of developing a seedless cit-

rus cultivar with a heritable seedless trait, it

is important to identify and understand any

affects that this trait may have on fruit size

and sugar content. The research presented

shows that the four families of F1 breed-

ing populations segregating for the seedless

(

Fsfs

) trait, have no significant difference in

fruit weight (g) or SSC (%) from their seeded

counterparts. In addition, the presence of

a neck at the stem segregated in a 3:1 (+/-)

fashion among these populations. This trait

had no consistent effect on the measured pa-

rameters in this study.

Literature Cited

Chao, C.C.T. 2005. Pollination study of mandarins

and the effect on seediness and fruit size: impli-

cations for seedless mandarin production. Hort-

Science. 40:362-365.

Chavez, D. J. and J.X. Chaparro. 2011. Identification of

Markers Linked to Seedlessness in Citrus kinokuni

hort. ex Tanaka and Its Progeny Using Bulked Seg-

regant Analysis. HortScience. 46:693-697.

M

andarin

Table 3.

Fruit weight and soluble solids concentration of Robinson OP ‘GS’ × C. kinokuni segregating population

for genetic seedlessness Fs as separated by presence or absence of fruit neck.

Phenotype

Genotypes (no)

Fruit (no)

Weight (g)

SSC (%)

Neck

138

396

100.31 a

z

8.95 a

Flush (no neck)

40

108

100.70 a

9.05 a

z

Similar letters within a column indicates means not significantly different, Tukey’s test, α=0.05.

Denney, J. O. and G.C. Martin. 1990. Xenia and

metaxenia: definitions and other boundaries. Hort-

Science. 25:1169-1169.

Futch, S. H. and L.K. Jackson. 1993. Pollination of

Citrus Hybrids. UF/IFAS. EDIS Doc.#HS182.

García-Martínez, J. L. and M.A. García-Papí. 1979.

The influence of gibberellic acid, 2, 4-dichloro-

phenoxyacetic acid and 6-benzylaminopurine

on fruit-set of Clementine mandarin. Scientia

Hort. 10:285-293.

García-Papí, M.A., and J.L. García-Martínez. 1984.

Endogenous plant growth substances content

in young fruits of seeded and seedless Clemen-

tine mandarin as related to fruit set and develop-

ment. Scientia Hort. 22:265-274.

Hearn, C. J., P.C. Reece, and R. Fenton. 1968. Effects

of pollen source on fruit characteristics and set

of four citrus hybrids. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc.

81:94-98.

Khan, I. A. (Ed.) 2007. Citrus genetics, breeding and

biotechnology. CABI. pp. 198-205.

Nesumi, H., M. Nakano, and T. Yoshida. 2001 Mode

of inheritance on the abnormal development of

impregnated ovules derived from Mukaku-kishu.

J. Jpn. Soc. Hor. Sci. 70 (Suppl. 2):403 (abstr) [in

Japanese].

Spiegel-Roy, P. and E.E. Goldschmidt. 1996. The biol-

ogy of Citrus. Cambridge Univ. Press. pp. 41.

Vithanage, V. 1991. Effect of different pollen parents

on seediness and quality of ‘Ellendale’tangor. Sci-

entia Hort. 48:253-260.

Wallace, H. M. and L.S. Lee. 1999. Pollen source, fruit

set and xenia in mandarins. J. Hort. Sci. Biotech-

nol. 74: 82-86.

Wallace, H. M., B.J. King, and L.S. Lee. 2002. Pol-

len flow and the effect on fruit size in an 'Imperial'

mandarin orchard. HortScience 37:84-86.

Yamasaki, A., A. Kitajima, N. Ohara, M. Tanaka, K.

Hasegawa. 2009. Characteristics of arrested seeds

in Mukaku Kishu-type seedless citrus. J. Jpn. Soc.

Hor. Sci. 78:61-67.