Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  137 / 620 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 137 / 620 Next Page
Page Background

Accuracy

- a. Analyze the NIST SRM 1849a over six days using multiple instruments and

compare results to the reported NIST-certified value.

b. Determine spike recovery from unfortified products (i.e., placebos). Spike each selected

sample at 50 and 100% of the amounts found in the unfortified products and analyze in duplicate

on each of three days. Use the overall mean of the unspiked unfortified samples for calculating

recoveries.

Reference sample

-NIST Standard Reference Material 1849a Infant/Adult Nutritional Formula,

or equivalent. SRM 1849a is a milk-based, hybrid infant/adult nutritional powder. One unit of

SRM 1849a contains 10 packets each containing approximately 10 g of material.

Sample calculation (Conversion of mg/L to µg/100 g):

For the conversion of mg/L concentration (obtained from Chromatogram) to µg/100 g, mg/L

concentration obtained was divided by 73.5 and multiplied by 100*1000 to get µg/100g.

Explanation of factor 73.5:

1.47 g of sample in 20 mL is equivalent to 73.5 g in 1 L and the fluoride concentration obtained

from chromatogram is in mg/L, thus mg of fluoride in 73.5 g of sample.

Validation Results

Separation and Detection

Ultra centrifugal filter devices were used to filter the sample and remove the fats and

proteins from the sample. Following the filtration, fluoride was separated from some common

anions using an IonPac AS15 column and detected by suppressed conductivity. Figure 1 shows

the Chromatogram of a 2.5 µL injection of the SRM 1849a sample. The retention time for

fluoride is 8.05 min (peak shown in the zoomed chromatogram). Fluoride concentration was

found to be almost equal in both placebo and fortified Child formula and IF milk based RTF

whereas for AN High fat and AN high protein, placebos show higher concentrations of fluoride

compared to that of the fortified samples. The chromatogram of Infant elemental formula did not

show presence of fluoride in either placebo or fortified sample.

Linearity

To determine linearity, fluoride calibration standards were injected in triplicate over

seven concentration levels covering the range of 20 –1000 µg/L. To establish stability of the

analytical curve, three independent experiments were conducted using independently prepared

standards. The calibration results show that the detection is linear over the concentration range,

with a coefficient of determination > 0.9995. Calibration errors at each level of the calibration

curve were > 5%. Check standards at the lowest point and midpoint of the analytical range were

Fluor-02 SLV

FOR ERP USE ONLY

DO NOT DISTRIBUTE