Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  13 / 412 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 13 / 412 Next Page
Page Background

Rosow DE, Sulica L. Laryngoscopy of vocal fold paralysis: evaluation of consistency of

clinical findings.

Laryngoscope

. 2010; 120(7):1376-1382. EBM level 2.................44-50

Summary:

This study sent videostroboscopy examination results from patients with unilateral

vocal fold paralysis (VFP) to 22 blinded laryngologists and asked them to rate the results on

twelve different criteria. The interrater reliability for each criterion was then calculated. The

criteria with the best interrater agreement were glottic insufficiency, vocal fold bowing, and

salivary pooling, which showed moderate agreement. All other criteria showed fair or poor

agreement. The authors concluded that while it would be ideal to have a standardized rating scale

for evaluation of VFP, the lack of interrater agreement across a wide range of laryngologists with

different training and different backgrounds suggests that this may be very difficult to achieve.

Simpson CB, May LS, Green JK, et al. Vibratory asymmetry in mobile vocal folds: is it

predictive of vocal fold paresis?

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol

. 2011; 120(4):239-242.

EBM level 4..................................................................................................................51-54

Summary:

This study is a retrospective review of 23 patients with symptoms suggestive of glottic

insufficiency and stroboscopy examinations showing normal vocal fold mobility and vibratory

asymmetry. All patients underwent laryngeal electromyography (LEMG) to determine presence

of paresis. A total of 19 patients (83%) had evidence of paresis on LEMG. Blinded reviewers

evaluated stroboscopy examinations for presence of paresis, but their ability to predict the

distribution (sidedness) of the paresis was 37% or worse. The authors note that their findings

suggest that all clinical and stroboscopic diagnoses of vocal fold paresis should be followed up

with LEMG as the gold standard for diagnosis.

C. Office-Based Procedures

Croake DJ, Stemple JC, Uhl T, et al. Reliability of clinical office-based laryngeal

electromyography in vocally healthy adults.

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol

. 2014;

123(4):271-278. EBM level 3......................................................................................55-62

Summary:

Using a quantitative analysis protocol to inform an essentially qualitative technique, the

study results indicated that there was generally poor to fair reliability in the laryngeal

electromyography (LEMG) signal over testing sessions. Vocal intensity was an important variable

that affected LEMG signal reliability. Standardization of LEMG protocols using vocal control

parameters and quantitative analyses may help improve LEMG reliability in clinical settings.

Koszewski IJ, Hoffman MR, Young WG, et al. Office-based photoangiolytic laser

treatment of Reinke’s edema: safety and voice outcomes.

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

.

2015; 152(6):1075-1081. EBM level 4........................................................................63-69

Summary:

This study provides a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing office-based laser

treatment of endoscopically proven Reinke’s edema. Nineteen patients met criteria for the study

inclusion. Five procedures were truncated due to patient intolerance. Phonatory frequency range

increased (N = 12,

p

= 0.003), while percent jitter decreased (N = 12,

p

= 0.004). Phonation

threshold pressure decreased after treatment (N = 4,

p

= 0.049). The Voice Handicap Index also

decreased (N = 14,

p

= 0.001).