![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0201.png)
Surgical treatment of SGS consisted of both endo-
scopic dilation and cricotracheal resection. Endoscopic
dilation technique did not vary substantially between
groups, aside from less frequent use of the carbon diox-
ide laser in the GPA group (
Table 4
). Patients with GPA
underwent a mean of 3.53 surgical dilations per patient
compared with 2.54 in those with iSGS (
P
= .44). Seven
patients with GPA-SGS (47%) required fewer than 2 air-
way dilations compared with 11 of those with iSGS (46%)
(
P
.99).
Definitive operative resection or reconstruction was
attempted in both groups; 5 of those withGPA-SGS (33%),
and 6 of those with iSGS (25%). While no patients with
an open airway reconstruction in the iSGS group re-
quired follow-up mechanical dilation, all patients with
open airway reconstructions in the GPA-SGS group un-
derwent more than 1 subsequent airway dilation
(
P
.01). Following open airway reconstruction, 1 pa-
tient with GPA-SGS underwent subsequent trache-
otomy. Open airway reconstruction led to permanent de-
cannulation of 2 previously tracheotomy-dependent
patients with GPA-SGS. Six patients with GPA-SGS (40%)
underwent tracheotomy as a result of disease-related com-
plications and 2 (13%) remained tracheotomy depen-
dent at the date of last follow-up. No patients with iSGS
required tracheotomy as a result of a disease-related com-
plications (
P
.01).
We examined the impact of various factors on the suc-
cess of airway procedures within each group (
Table 5
and
Table 6
). The presence of gastroesophageal reflux
disease (GERD) and the operative use of carbon dioxide
laser were not found to have an impact on the rate of sur-
gical utilization. Male patients withGPA-SGS had a shorter
time until additional procedures were needed than fe-
male patients with GPA-SGS, while the presence of a pre-
vious tracheostomy showed a nonsignificant trend to-
ward worse outcomes. When patients from both cohorts
(GPA-SGS and iSGS) were pooled into a single group,
none of these factors (sex and history of tracheostomy
or GERD) had any significant impact on time until ad-
ditional procedures were needed.
We analyzed the utilization of systemic immuno-
therapy within both groups. All patients with GPA-SGS
and 50% of iSGS individuals received systemic immu-
notherapy at some point throughout follow-up as part
of disease management; all patients with iSGS received
corticosteroids, while patients with GPA received a mix
of corticosteroids (n = 13), methotrexate sodium (n = 11),
and cyclophosphamide (n = 9). Use of immunosuppres-
sive medicationwas not associated with longer procedure-
free intervals.
COMMENT
When traumatic causes are not readily identifiable by pa-
tient history, determining the etiology of SGS can be di-
agnostically challenging. While many patients with non-
traumatic SGSmay have a systemic autoimmune condition
such as GPA, many others will have an unrevealing au-
toimmune workup. In the absence of any identifiable
cause, these patients are considered to have iSGS, al-
though there is some speculation that this may be due
to some unknown autoimmune mechanism. This study
was conducted to better define the similarities and dif-
ferences in presentation and therapeutic management of
iSGS and GPA-SGS.
Previously, it has been demonstrated that GPA-SGS
affects men and women equally.
2
In contrast, iSGS al-
most exclusively affects women
3,9,10
; it is thought to pre-
dominantly affect women owing to estrogen-mediated al-
terations to wound-healing responses in the subglottic
airway.
11
Our study is consistent with these observa-
tions, further confirming the tendency for iSGS to dis-
proportionately affect men and for GPA-SGS to affect both
men and women. Interestingly, we observed that male
GPA-SGS patients underwent more frequent subglottic
airway surgical procedures than female patients withGPA-
SGS. This may be due, in part, to previous trends noting
that male patients with GPA tend to develop a more se-
vere form of the disease than female patients with GPA.
12
The median age of initial presentation in patients with
GPA-SGS (36.3 years) was almost 9 years younger than
that of the iSGS group (45.2 years). Although not statis-
tically significant (
P
= .24), this finding is broadly in line
with that of previous research, and we speculate that had
our cohort been larger, the observations would have been
significant. A study of 52 patients with iSGS found the
average age of initial presentation to be 43.5 years,
9
Table 2. Myer-Cotton Staging (MCS) at Time
of Endoscopic Dilation
Characteristic
No. (%)
GPA Idiopathic Combined
Patients undergoing endoscopic
dilation. No.
14
23
38
Dilations with known MCS, No.
36
50
86
MCS
a
1
8 (22.2)
2 (4) 10 (11.6)
2
16 (44.4) 14 (28) 30 (34.9)
3
12 (33.3) 34 (68) 46 (53.5)
4
0
0
0
Abbreviation: GPA, granulomatosis with polyangiitis.
a
P
= .02.
Table 3. Stenosis Location at Time
of First Endoscopic Dilation
Characteristic
No. (%)
GPA Idiopathic Combined
Patients undergoing endoscopic
dilation, No.
14
23
38
Dilations with known stenosis
location at time of first
endoscopic dilation, No.
11
19
30
Stenosis location
a
Anterior
1 (9.1)
8 (42.1)
9 (30)
Posterior
1 (9.1)
2 (10.5)
3 (10)
Circumferential
9 (81.2)
9 (47.4)
18 (60)
Abbreviation: GPA, granulomatosis with polyangiitis.
a
P
= .42.
JAMA OTOLARYNGOL HEAD NECK SURG/VOL 139 (NO. 1), JAN 2013
WWW.JAMAOTO.COM©2013 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
181