Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  314 / 350 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 314 / 350 Next Page
Page Background

colonies and results were reported by averaging counts between triplicate plates. Final results were

1

presented as colony forming units per gram (CFU/g).

2

3M Petrifilm Rapid Yeast Mold Plate Method

3

Paired test portions for each matrix were prepared as described in the ISO and FDA BAM reference

4

methods. A 1 mL aliquot of each sample dilution was placed on the RYM Petrifilm. The top film was

5

gently lowered and the aliquot was spread with the 3M Petrifilm Flat Spreader. The plates were left

6

undisturbed for one minute, and incubated for 48 ±2 hours at 25±1°C. Typical colonies were

7

enumerated and reported as CFU/g. The RYM plates were reincubated for an additional 12 hours (60

8

total hours) and then enumerated using a Quebec colony counter. Typical yeast colonies were small

9

pink tan or blue green in color with defined edges. Molds s typically formed large blue-green colonies

10

with diffuse edges.

11

12

RESULTS

13

For each matrix, the colony forming units/g were converted to log

10

and analyzed. A t-test was

14

performed using the appropriate assumption for equal or unequal variance to evaluate the mean of the

15

log

10

values for statistical difference between two methods at the 95% confidence level.

16

Repeatability of the Petrifilm RYM method and the reference methods was calculated as the standard

17

deviation (S

r

) for each contamination level for each matrix.

18

Yogurt 48 hours

19

No statistically significant difference was observed between all 3 levels analyzed between the two

20

methods. The p-values calculated at a 95% confidence level for the low, medium, and high levels were

21

0.6343, 0.4633, and 0.6776, respectively. The t-test indicated no significant differences between the 3M

22

RYM method and the ISO and FDA BAM methods. The 3M RYM method had a higher repeatability value

23

than the ISO and FDA BAM methods for the medium and high levels, with S

r

values, respectively, of

24

0.0279 and 0.0850 for the medium level and 0.0787 and 0.0895 for the high level. For the low level the

25

ISO and FDA BAM had higher repeatability value compared to the RYM method, with S

r

values,

26

respectively, of 0.1026 and 0.0445. Detailed results are presented in Table 12.

27

28

29

30

31

18

AOAC Research Institute

Expert R view Panel Use Only

OMAMAN-16D/ PTM Report

ERP Use Only - December 2014