Previous Page  23 / 52 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 23 / 52 Next Page
Page Background www.speechpathologyaustralia.org.au

ACQ

Volume 12, Number 2 2010

77

Future research

This review of the literature reveals that research is urgently

needed to inform clinical practice about coping strategies

that children who stutter have found to be effective in

decreasing or stopping teasing and other forms of bullying. A

qualitative investigation that addresses this gap in knowledge

is underway. The authors are using in-depth semi-structured

interviews to learn about the bullying experiences of children

who stutter, their responses to the bullying, and their

perceptions of helpful and unhelpful strategies to deal with

bullying.

References

Blood, G. W., & Blood, I. M. (2007). Preliminary study of

self-reported experience of physical and bullying of boys

who stutter: Relations to increased anxiety.

Perceptual and

Motor Skills

,

104

, 1060–1066.

Boulton, M. J., Trueman, M., Chau, C., Whitehand, C.,

& Amatya, K. (1999). Concurrent and longitudinal links

between friendship and peer victimization: Implications

for befriending interventions.

Journal of Adolescence

,

22

,

462–466.

Card, N. A. & Hodges, E. V. E. (2008). Peer victimization

among schoolchildren: Correlations, causes, consequences,

and considerations in assessment and intervention.

School

Psychology Quarterly

,

23

, 451–461.

Craig, W., & Pepler, D. (2008). Understanding and

addressing bullying: An international perspective. In D.

Pepler & W. Craig (Eds.),

Understanding and addressing

bullying: An international perspective

(pp. xix–xxvi).

Bloomington, IN: AuthorHouse.

Craig, W., Pepler, D., & Blais, J. (2007). Responding to

bullying: What works?

School Psychology International

,

28

,

465–477.

Davis, S., Howell, P., & Cooke, F. (2002). Sociodynamic

relationships between children who stutter and their

non-stuttering classmates.

Journal of Child Psychology &

Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines

,

43

, 939–947.

Hugh-Jones, S., & Smith, P. K. (1999). Self-reports of

short- and long-term effects of bullying on children who

stammer.

British Journal of Educational Psychology

,

69

,

141–158.

Kochenderfer-Ladd, B. (2004). Peer victimization: The

role of emotions in adaptive and maladaptive coping.

Social

Development

,

13

, 329–349.

Kochenderfer-Ladd, B., & Skinner, K. (2002). Children’s

coping strategies: Moderators of the effects of peer

victimization?

Developmental Psychology

,

38

, 267–278.

Langevin, M. (2000).

Teasing and bullying: Unacceptable

behaviour (TAB)

. Edmonton, Alberta: Institute for Stuttering

Treatment & Research.

Langevin, M. (n.d.).

Teasing and bullying: Helping children

deal with teasing and bullying: For parents, teachers and

other adults

. Retrieved 26 February, 2010 from http://www.

stutterisa.org/CDRomProject/teasing/tease_bully.html

Langevin, M., Bortnick, K., Hammer, T., & Wiebe, E.

(1998). Teasing/bullying experienced by children who stutter:

Toward development of a questionnaire.

Contemporary

Issues in Communication Science and Disorders

,

25

, 12–24.

Langevin, M., Kully, D. A., & Ross-Harold, B. (2007). The

Comprehensive Stuttering Program for school-age children

with strategies for managing teasing and bullying. In E.

G. Conture & R. F. Curlee (Eds.),

Stuttering and related

disorders of fluency

(3rd ed., pp. 131–149). New York:

Thieme.

Link, J., & Tellis, G. (2006). Children who stutter are bullied

in schools: Counseling strategies for speech-language

pathologists.

Advance for Speech-Language Pathologists

and Audiologists

,

16

, 14–15.

Mahady Wilton, M. M., Craig, W. M., & Pepler, D. J.

(2000). Emotional regulation and display in classroom victims

of bullying: Characteristic expressions of affect, coping styles

and relevant contextual factors.

Social Development

,

9

,

226–245.

Marini, Z. A., & Dane, A. V. (2008). Matching interventions

to bullying subtypes: Ensuring programs fit the multifaceted

needs of children involved in bullying. In D. Pepler & W.

Craig (Eds.),

Understanding and addressing bullying: An

international perspective

(pp. 97–126). Bloomington, IN:

AuthorHouse.

Murphy, W. P., & Quesal, R. W. (2002). Strategies for

addressing bullying with the school-age child who stutters.

Seminars in Speech & Language

,

23

, 205–212.

Murphy, W. P., Yaruss, J. S., & Quesal, R. W. (2007).

Enhancing treatment for school-age children who stutter II:

Reducing bullying through role-playing and self-disclosure.

Journal of Fluency Disorders

,

32

, 139–162.

Oliver, C., & Candappa, M. (2007). Bullying and the politics

of “telling”.

Oxford Review of Education

,

33

, 71–86.

Olweus, D. (1993).

Bullying at school: What we know and

what we can do

. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.

Olweus, D. (2001). Peer harassment: A critical analysis

and some important issues. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham

(Eds.),

Peer harassment in school: The plight of the

vulnerable and the victimized

(pp. 3–20). New York: The

Guilford Press.

Rigby, K. (2003). Consequences of bullying in schools.

Canadian Journal of Psychiatry

,

48

, 583–590.

Salmivalli, C., Karhunen, J., & Lagerspetz, K. M. J.

(1996). How do the victims respond to bullying?

Aggressive

Behavior

,

22

, 99–109.

Salmivalli, C., & Peets, K. (2009). Bullies, victims, and

bully-victim relationships in middle childhood and early

adolescence. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen

(Eds.),

Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and

groups

(pp. 322–340). New York: The Guildford Press.

Smith, P. K., Talamelli, L., Cowie, H., Naylor, P., &

Chauhan, P. (2004). Profiles of non-victims, escaped victims,

continuing victims and new victims of school bullying.

British

Journal of Educational Psychology

,

74

, 565–581.

Turnbull, J. (2006). Promoting greater understanding in

peers of children who stammer.

Emotional & Behavioural

Difficulties

,

11

, 237–247.

Nathania van Kuik Fast

is a second-year student in the

Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology at the

University of Alberta.

Marilyn Langevin

is an assistant professor and director of

research at the Institute for Stuttering Treatment and Research in

Edmonton, Alberta.

Correspondence to:

Dr Marilyn Langevin

Institute for Stuttering Treatment & Research

Suite 1500, 8215 – 112 Street, Edmonton, Alberta

Canada, T6G 2C8

phone: +780 492 2619

fax: +780 492 8457

email:

marilyn.langevin@ualberta.ca