Previous Page  26 / 52 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 26 / 52 Next Page
Page Background

80

ACQ

Volume 12, Number 2 2010

ACQ

uiring knowledge in speech, language and hearing

compared to other traditional clinical placements, in relation

to working with interdisciplinary students and the experiential

nature of the program (see Mathisen & Edmunds, 2009, for a

summary of the focus group notes).

Unpublished preliminary findings from an evaluation by

the Family Action Centre are consistent with the pilot study

data for speech pathology students. So far 15 student

volunteers have participated in focus groups discussing their

experiences during the camp and have been very positive

about what they learnt during the camps. In particular they

felt they had a greater understanding of the daily experience

for families with children with special needs and reported

that the SNUG program helped them to recognise the

importance and complexity of family-centred practice, as

illustrated by the following quotes:

Student 1: I guess I learned to take the whole family

approach and not just about the person in front of you. I

think that was the biggest thing I learned.

Student 2: I’ve got a few clients at the moment, at my

placement and they’ll come in with parents and say,

“‘Oh sorry, we’re just so busy, we didn’t get time to do

the homework [set by an allied health professional]”.

Before I was at the camp, I would just think, “Oh they

don’t care much or they’re just a bit lazy”, but you can

really see why people just don’t get the homework done.

It is worth noting that the families also appreciated the fact

that the camps are helping to produce therapists with greater

awareness of living with special needs. In particular, they

emphasised the importance of the camp providing students

with insights into family life when a child has special needs.

The SNUG volunteer role is both active and direct.

Research from other non-traditional placements has

suggested that an active role may facilitate experiential and

deep learning (Fieldhouse & Fedden, 2009; Healey, 2008).

It appears from the evidence regarding non-traditional

placements that there is potential for students to learn

valuable interpersonal and collaborative skills through their

roles as SNUG volunteers. These skills are seen to be

important in managing rapid change in healthcare service

delivery, and in particular in the speech pathology discipline

(McAllister, 2005).

The SNUG program is an example of students being

engaged in real-life experiences that enhance their

professional development as speech pathologists. Through

the camps, they are able to experience strength-based,

family-centred practice and gain valuable insights into the

lives of families living children with special needs. While

further research is needed into the benefits of SNUG for the

students’ future practice, the feedback to date suggests that

students feel they are gaining valuable experience through

the camps.

Summary

Practical experience in non-traditional settings such as

SNUG plays an important role in developing an integrated

understanding of practice known as deep learning

(Fieldhouse & Fedden, 2009). With the emerging awareness

and place of family-centred and strength-based practice in

speech pathology, practical student experience may facilitate

the development of the required skills and knowledge in

these areas.

References

Carter, B., Cummings, J., & Cooper, L. (2007). An

exploration of best practice in multi-agency working and the

a feeling of empowerment and an increased ability to access

services (Warmington, 2003).

Student involvement in SNUG

Consistent with the aims of SNUG, student volunteers from

a range of undergraduate degrees at The University of

Newcastle have the opportunity to interact with families while

assisting with the residential camp. Fifty-eight students have

volunteered over the first five camps and primarily come from

disciplines relating to children with special needs, including

speech pathology, occupational therapy, education and

nursing. These students receive specific training for

strength-based practice by the Family Action Centre staff

preceding the camp. Students also receive supervision

throughout the program from the two SNUG coordinators

and participate in group discussion where they reflect on

their experiences during the camps.

Throughout the camp, students work with families,

coordinators and other volunteer students to ensure the

program runs smoothly. They help facilitate activities for the

families, assist the children with special needs to participate in

camp activities, provide practical assistance (e.g., with meals),

help families attend medical appointments and generally

provide practical support to the families. Importantly, the

students also have many informal opportunities to get to

know family members, learn more about the roles of other

professions, and gain valuable insights into the reality of life

for families facing a range of challenges.

The student experience for SNUG program volunteers

may be considered non-traditional, as supervision is not

provided by clinicians from their own discipline. Formal

assessments are not incorporated for speech pathology

students, and the camp setting is not typical of clinical

placements, nor of a typical speech pathology setting. The

qualitative studies of non-traditional placements suggest that

they provide a greater opportunity for reflective practice and

evaluation to facilitate deep learning and the development of

a strong professional identity (Fieldhouse & Fedden, 2009;

Overton, Clark, & Thomas, 2009). Non-traditional settings

like SNUG may provide opportunities for skills such as

assertiveness, negotiation and collaboration to be continually

practised, and lead to a greater focus on the client rather

than the student’s own performance (Fieldhouse & Fedden,

2009; Overton et al., 2009).

As students from different disciplines work together in

a real setting with families, there is a great opportunity for

peer learning and the potential for students to develop an

awareness of different professional perspectives, marking the

way for an understanding and expectation of interdisciplinary

practice (Geller, Rhyne, Hansbarger, Borrego, VanLeit, &

Scaletti, 2002). Evidence from a systematic review suggests

that peer learning increases clinical skills and knowledge

(Secomb, 2008). As a result, it is now common for speech

pathology programs in Australia to place more than one

student with the one clinical educator (McAllister, 2005).

Future research

The SNUG program is in its infancy and so the benefits for

students are the subject of ongoing research. A pilot study

involving six speech pathology students investigated the

SNUG volunteer experience through focus group discussion

based on the first two camps conducted in 2009. Preliminary

results from these focus group discussions indicated that the

students reported a greater insight into the family’s

experience, increased confidence in working in the area of

special needs, and a greater sense of commitment and

compassion. Students highlighted the experience as unique,