Previous Page  62 / 208 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 62 / 208 Next Page
Page Background

Chapter 3

60

Table 1b.

Ventilator settings and metabolic measurement data for all children and for subgroups based on

compatibility of the indirect calorimetry (IC) and ventilator method (defined as a difference ≤10% or >10%

between IC and ventilator-derived VCO

2

values)

All children

N=41

Difference

≤ 10%

N=18

Difference

>10%

N=23

P-value

Ventilation mode

Support

Control

%

34.1

65.9

33.3

66.7

34.8

65.2

0.94

c

FiO

2

Median (IQR) 0.26

(0.21-0.31)

0.28

(0.21-0.36)

0.25

(0.21-0.30)

0.57

b

Tidal volume (ml)

Inspiratory

Expiratory

Median (IQR)

89 (34-157)

91 (34-180)

142 (96-185)

143 (95-198)

36 (20-90)

35 (19-97)

0.002

b

0.001

b

Tube leak (%)

(inspiratory-expiratory tidal

volume)

Mean ± SD -1.9 ± 8.6 -4.8 ± 10.2 0.3 ± 6.4 0.07

a

Respiratory rate (/min)

Median (IQR) 38 (25-47)

26 (23-35)

43 (38-50)

0.02

b

Heart rate (/min)

Median (IQR) 116

(103-139)

113

(99-124)

128

(101-142)

0.27

b

LOS at moment of

measurement (days)

Median (IQR) 2 (1-4)

2 (1-4)

2 (1-4)

0.75

b

Length of measurement (min)

Mean ± SD

30 ± 9.5

34 ± 8

33 ± 11

0.71

a

VCO

2

Deltatrac (ml/min)

Median (IQR) 75.2

(41.6-116.1)

108.6

(94-132.9)

45.9

(28.3-78.6)

<0.001

b

VCO

2

Servo-I (ml/min)

Median (IQR) 74.0

(27.5-118.0)

111.6

(94.8-135.9)

33.4

(12.6-75.3)

<0.001

b

P-values are calculated for differences between the two subgroups using the following tests:

a

Independent

samples t-test,

b

Mann-Whitney test,

c

Chi-square test.

IQR= Interquartile Range, FiO

2

= Fraction inspired Oxygen, LOS= Length of Stay, SD= Standard Deviation

Correlationbetween Servo-I®-derivedVCO

2

values and IC-derived valueswas excellent [ρ=0.965

(95% CI: 0.935 to 0.981)]. However, despite being a necessary condition for agreement, high

correlation does not automatically imply good agreement. Figure 1a shows the Bland-Altman

plot for agreement between the two methods for measuring VCO

2

values. Measurements were

not comparable with a mean relative difference of 15.6% (p=0.002, one-sample t-test), due to

underestimation of VCO

2

values by the Servo-I®. The 95% limits of agreement were wide (-42.4

% and 73.6%). Linear regression of Servo-I®-derived VCO

2

values on IC-derived values showed

a regression line with a slope of 1.15 (95% CI: 1.07 to 1.23) and an intercept at -15.66 (95% CI:

-23.32 to -8.01). The slope of this regression line was significantly different from 1 (p<0.001),

and the intercept was significantly different from 0 (p<0.001), reflecting both proportional and

fixed bias.