Previous Page  119 / 140 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 119 / 140 Next Page
Page Background

DECEMBER, 1926]

The Gazette of the Incorporated Law Society of Ireland.

29

Bradley and John J. Horgan, our repre–

sentatives on the Circuit Courts Committee,

for the care and skill they have shown in

dealing with these Rules. The profession is

greatly indebted to them.

It is hoped that

the new Rules will be in force at an early

date.

District Court Rules.

The District Court Rules, prepared by the

Committee appointed under the Courts of

Justice Act, with

the exception of

the

Rules mentioned in the Report, were adopted

by the two Houses of Parliament and came

into operation on the 1st October.

The

Council learn that these Rules are working

satisfactorily, and much credit in connection

with their preparation is due to our repre–

sentatives on the Rule-making Authority,

Mr. E. H. Burne and Mr. James S. Gaffney,

of Limerick.

Appeals from the Circuit Courts.

I now come to a matter of very grave

importance to the profession.

We have received a number of communica–

tions from the Sessional Bars and individual

Solicitors throughout the country on the

subject of Circuit Court Appeals.

In the

first place, there are a great number of

Appeals pending, and the delay in bringing

them to a hearing must in many cases result

in a miscarriage of justice. An unsuccessful

litigant before the Circuit Court Judge has

only to lodge a Notice of Appeal to gain a

period of several months time before he can

be compelled to meet his obligation. The

delay is serious enough, but the system of

appeal inaugurated by the Courts of Justice

Act is even more serious in its results. These

Appeals are now heard by two Judges sitting

in Dublin on the evidence as transcribed by

the shorthand-writer.

I do not think it is

any disparagement of the shorthand-writer's

work to say that it is quite impossible for

any shorthand-writer sitting in Court for

hours to take an accurate and full note of

all the evidence ;

but even assuming that it

is a perfectly accurate transcript of

the

evidence as given in Court, the Judges sitting

to hear the Appeal have not the advantage

of seeing the demeanour of witnesses in the

box or of testing in an}^ way the value of the

evidence given. Accordingly, except in the

case of a question of law, the present system

of appeal is almost valueless. Having regard

to the greatly increased jurisdiction of the

Circuit Court (that jurisdiction extending up

to £300), it is more necessary than ever that

an Appeal should be in the nature of a full

and thorough investigation of the whole case,

and we think the only satisfactory method

of Appeal, therefore, is a re-hearing before

specially appointed Commissioners or a Judge

of the High Court sitting at regular intervals

in the principal cities and towns in the

country.

In addition, the present system of

hearing an Appeal is far more costly to the

litigants than the old procedure of a re–

hearing.

The present system is slow in

working, very expensive to litigants and quite

unsatisfactory in the results.

The Society's Premises.

As you will have seen from the Report, the

Board of "Works is at present engaged in the

re-building of

the Four Courts, and has

submitted to the Council plans for building

new premises for

the occupation of

this

Society. These plans have received our most

careful consideration, and I have, with our

Secretary, had several interviews with the

Chairman of

the Board and with

their

Architect.

It is proposed, subject to certain

arrangements which we are making with the

Benchers for acquiring the fee of our old site

and then making a lease of same to the Board,

of V/orks, to give us a new building for the

exclusive occupation of the Society on the

site formerly occupied by the Stamp Office,

the Taxing Office and part of the Bank–

ruptcy Buildings. We shall have similar

halls, Library and rooms, and similar accom–

modation to what we had in our old premises,

with the advantage that we shall have what

I hope will be a handsome building with

covered access to the Courts and the Law

Library, and which building will be for our

exclusive use, with no rights of way or

passage as in our old quarters. The general

plans have been approved, and the detailed

work will be supervised by our own architect.

I should like to say a word of thanks to the

Chairman of the Board of Works and their

architect for the way they have met any

suggestion from this Council.

.

.

.

:

.