Previous Page  161 / 262 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 161 / 262 Next Page
Page Background

"Improper Assents"

Members wrote commenting on the article under the

heading "Improper Assents in the Land Registry" in

the March 1973 issue of the Society's Gazette. They

stated that on the example of a deceased intestate

leaving six next of kin and five of them signing an

agreement for natural love and affection or for finan-

cial consideration to transfer and release their interest

in the lands to the sixth party it would have been

necessary to execute, stamp and produce to the Land

Registry a formal deed before the lands could be trans-

ferred to the sixth party. They asked the Society to

consider whether the legal personal representative is

entitled to act on the agreement (which does not carry

a stamp) and is sent to the sixth party to be registered

as final owner. Must the personal representative insist

on the legal transfer being entered into and stamped

and would it be considered improper for the solicitor

to act in connection with such assent in pursuance of

such agreement which requires no stamp as distinct

from a formal duly stamped transfer? The Council on a

report from a committee stated that the correct course

for a solicitor to take is to have a properly drawn up

agreement of release and transfer under seal executed

by all beneficiaries entitled to take who are transferring

their portion of the estate to a fellow beneficiary

whether for financial consideration or otherwise. It is

wrong for a solicitor to lodge an "improper" assent.

This is of particular importance in the case of voluntary

releases as the standard form of requisition on title

asks whether there were any voluntary transfers on title.

A solicitor would be placed in a very troublesome

predicament in answering this question in the event

of a voluntary transfer by way of improper assent being

effected and forming part of the title.

Duty solicitors for cases in the Children's Court

At the suggestion of a member it was decided to

refer this matter to the Dublin Solicitors' Bar Associa-

tion for discussion with practitioners in that Court.

Second Irish examination

It was decided to reverse a previous decision of the

Council and that in future there will be two first Irish

examinations yearly one in February and the second in

July.

District Court Rules Committee

Mr. Richard Knight was re-appointed as the

Society's representative on the District Court Rules

committee for five years with effect from 24th April

1973.

Incorporated Council of Law Reporting

Mr. John Buckley was appointed as one of the

Society's representatives on the Council.

SHARING STOCKBROKERS' COMMI SS ION

The Council received an enquiry from members as to

whether there is any professional objection to sharing

stockbrokers' commission following the integration of

the Stock Exchanges of the Republic and the United

Kingdom. Irish stockbrokers now follow the English

practice of allowing a commission of 20% of the stock-

brokers commission to solicitors and other persons

placing business with them provided that the person

taking the commission is included in the general register

kept pursuant to Rule 212(2) (b) of the Stock Ex-

change. There is only one Stock Exchange in England

and Ireland of which the Dublin Exchange is the Irish

unit and a common set of rules apply throughout.

An applicant for inclusion in the general register

applies on a form which may be obtained from the

Stock Exchange and pays an annual registration fee of

£10.50. Paragraph 3 of the form provides that no part

of the commission shall directly or indirectly be re-

turned or allowed to the principal or any other person

but this undertaking does not preclude the applicant

from agreeing to waive in whole or in part the charges

which he would otherwise be entitled to make for

services rendered specifically and exclusively in connec-

tion with the purchase or the sale of stocks or shares

in respect of which such share of commission arises.

The stockbrokers bought or sold note contains a state-

ment that the commission is shared.

The Council on a report from a committee decided

that there is no objection to applications by solicitors

for inclusion in the general register of the Stock Ex-

change kept pursuant to Rule 212(2) (b) and accept-

ing the commission, now 20% of the stockbrokers'

commission in respect of business transacted on behalf

of clients. All Stockbrokers in the U.K. and Ireland

follow the same rules.

DUBLIN SOLICITORS' BAR ASSOCIATION

The following matters were before recent meetings of

the Council.

(1) Registry

of

Deeds delays

On a report from a sub-committee it was agreed to

make representations to the Department of Justice for

the employment of additional staff in the Registry of

Deeds, including the appointment of an additional

Assistant Registrar or Chief Clerk, to enable the regis-

tration of documents to be completed more speedily and

to enable the time taken for completing Negative

Searches to be reduced from the present unsatisfactory

period.

(2)

Charging of Outlay by Builders to Purchasers'

Solicitors

On a report from a sub-committee following their

consideration of Counsel's opinion received by the Law

Society on this question, it was agreed to make represen-

tation to the Law Society and to the Department of

Justice seeking an amendation of the provisions of

Section 33 of the Landlord & Tenant (Ground Rents)

Act 1967, so a s to oblige Lessors to furnish good

marketable title to prospective House Purchasers, where

the transaction is carried on by way of Lease, without

any charge.

158