Previous Page  186 / 262 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 186 / 262 Next Page
Page Background

tained a statement requesting the applicant to insert

his solicitor's full name and address and that if the

applicant had not a solicitor he might find it beneficial

to use the Society's solicitor. The Society wrote to the

solicitor for the building society and to the society itself

stating that this statement would involve the solicitor

in a contravention of the Professional Practice Regula-

tions. The building society agreed to amend the terms

of the letter in accordance with the Society's request.

Commission scale fee probate and administration

matters

The Council on a report from a committee considered

several requests for guidance. In one case the deceased's

assets amounted to £15,000 and life interests and other

assets passing amounted to £40,000. Estate Duty was

charged on the aggregate of £55,000 and member

asked whether he could charge a commission scale fee

on £55.000. The Council in reply pointed out that the

commission scale fee is not an official scale but is to be

used as a rough guideline or yardstick. It would de-

pend largely on the amount of the work done by the

solicitor in relation to the life interest and if the solici-

tor did no work in that connection it was felt that the

appropriate scale fee should be charged only on the

basis of an estate for £15,000.

In another case the deceased held a house jointly

with a sister. The question was whether the value of

the deceased's interest in the house should be added to

the value of the absolute estate in assess'ng the scale

fee. The Council were of the opinion that if the scale

fee is applicable it would be correct to include one half

of the value of the house together with all other assets

in determining the amount in which the commission is

payable.

It was stated that in both cases the adoption of the

commission scale fee is by agreement with the client

and that the costs thereby produced are intended to

approximate to the fees which would be chargeable

under schedule 2 and other appropriate regulations, the

object being to avoid the inconvenience and expense of

drawing detailed bills of cost.

J ULY 26

The President in the Chair, also present, Messrs. W.

B. Allen, Walter Beatty, Bruce St. J. Blake, John F.

Buckley, John Carrigan, Anthony E. Collins, Laurence

Cullen, Gerard M. Doyle, James R. C. Green, Chris-

topher Hogan, Michael P. Houlihan, Thomas Jackson,

Jnr., Francis J. Lanigan, John Maher, Patrick C.

Moore,. Eunan McCarron, Patrick McEllin, Patrick

McEntee, Brendan A. McGrath, John J. Nash, Patrick

Noonan, John C. O'Carroll, Peter E. O'Connell, Rory

O'Connor, James W. O'Donovan, William A. Osborne,

Peter D. M. Prentice, David R. Pigot, Mrs. Moya

Quinlan, Robert McD. Taylor and Ralph J. Walker.

The following was among the business transacted.

Interest on monies lodged in Court

It was pointed out that Court lodgments may re-

main in the Government bank for a long period earn-

ing no interest to the party. It was stated that the

Superior Courts Rules Committee is at present con-

sidering a rule providing for the investment of such

monies.

Practice by solicitors as unlimited companies

By direction of the Council a case was sent to counsel

for advice as to the legal position in this matter.

Advertisement of sale in solicitors' office

A press advertisement drafted and inserted by an

auctioneer without reference to the solicitor stated

that the auctioneer and interested parties would attend

at the office of the solicitor on a named date when the

property would be sold and the contract executed. The

auctioneer and interested parties attended at the office

of the solicitor who read the conditions of sale. The

property was sold and the contract executed. The

Council on a report from a solicitor stated that the

advertisement inserted by the auctioneer was open to

objection on professional grounds. It was recognised

that the solicitor was not responsible.

Road Traffic Prosecutions

On a report from a committee the Council stated

that the minimum fee of ten gns. paid by insurance

companies to a solicitor for conducting the defence of

the insured party and supplying a report of the pro-

ceedings is inadequate. The committee took the view

that the minimum fee should now be fifteen gns. It

was decided to negotiate a fresh agreement with the

Accident Offices Association.

Dublin Corporation certificates as to roads and services

The Council considered a report of a meeting be-

tween representatives of the Council and representa-

tives of the local authorities concerned which will be

printed in the Society's Gazette in due course.

COMMITTEE ON COURT PRACTICE AND

PROCEDURE

The following Interim Reports have recently been

issued :

(1) 12th Interim Report on Courts Organisation.

(Price 17£p plus 12£p postage).

(2) 17th Interim Report on Court Fees. (Price 9p plus

3p postage).

(3) 18th Interim Report on Execution of Money,

Judgments, Orders and Decrees. (Price lOp plus

3p postage.

All these publications which will be summarised later,

can be obtained from the Government Publications Sale

Office, G.P.O. Buildings, Dublin 1.

183