Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  11 / 42 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 11 / 42 Next Page
Page Background WWW.AOAC.ORG

301.924.7077

11

MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 2017

1:00PM – 1:30PM

Kaushik Banerjee,

National Referral Laboratory, Indian Council of Agricultural

Research-National Research Centre for Grapes, Pune, India

In this year’s Harvey W. Wiley Award Address, at the 131st AOAC Annual Meeting and Exposition in Atlanta, GA, Wiley

Award winner

Kaushik Banerjee

from the National Referral Laboratory, Indian Council of Agricultural Research-National

Research Centre for Grapes, Pune, India, reflects on the technical advancements and challenges in developing an

agrochemical residue analysis system in India over the last 14 years. He stresses the importance of precise and accurate

analysis in establishing and sustaining food safety traceability systems in agricultural crops. The Harvey W. Wiley Award

is AOAC INTERNATIONAL’s top scientific honor, given annually for career accomplishments in the analytical sciences.

Banerjee will outline the workflow of agrochemical residue analysis that starts with optimized random sampling at

pre- and post-harvest levels, followed by sample extraction, cleanup, and final analysis by mass spectrometry (MS). In

addition, he will highlight the importance of high-quality analytical test results that govern optimization of each step in

residue analysis.

India’s pesticide residue control system was first established in 2004 for table grapes, with plot level traceability of

test samples beginning with release of a consignment into the market. In developing appropriate analytical methods,

Banerjee and his team initially focused on a multiclass, multiresidue analysis method for monitoring a list of about

50 agrochemicals, including chlorinated hydrocarbons, organophosphorus, and carbamate pesticides. Considering the

typical carbohydrate-rich and low-fat nature of Indian fruits and vegetables, the preferred solvent for extraction was

ethyl acetate. Efforts were taken to minimize solvent and reagent requirements, so that methods were cost-effective

and easy to adopt by Indian food testing laboratories. The optimized protocol was, therefore, rapid, precise, accurate,

economically viable, and had high throughput.

For the first time in India, tandem MS methods were implemented for residue testing on both GC and LC-MS systems. In

addition, a detailed analytical quality control procedure [per the European Commission Directorate-General Health and

Food Safety (DG SANTE) guidelines] was put into practice. The method was gradually expanded to cover a number of

compounds based on pesticide usage information in India and detection statistics in importing countries.

Prior to 2004, residue analysis in India was performed by gas chromatography- and high-performance liquid

chromatography-based methods, using relatively nonselective detectors (e.g., ECD and UV). The use of MS in

quantitative residue analysis was a new concept for Indian laboratories. Between 2004 and 2010, the infrastructure of

laboratories in India was highly variable. Another challenge was dealing with differences in competence levels across

the laboratories. Thus, efforts were focused on establishing validated methods to fit various technologies, including

single quad, ion trap, triple quad, and time-of-flight (TOF) MS. Strategies were implemented so that laboratories could

perform residue testing through their existing facilities, with desired accuracy in compliance with analytical quality

control criteria. Organizing fit-for-purpose capacity building programs was important for the residue analysis system.

Banerjee and his team received support from experts across the globe, including scientists from the U.S. Food and Drug

WILEY AWARD ADDRESS

Advances and Challenges in

Establishing Residue Analysis System in India