11
th Report of Committee of Court
Practice and Procedure on the Powers
of the Supreme Court
Recommendations
The Committee unanimously ren)!lllliend as follows
(subject to reservations annexcd to this Report hy Mr.
E. C. Micks and Mr.
J.
McMahon as to recoll'lIl1Cn–
dations numhered (8) to (11) inclusive) :
(1) Section 52 of the Courts (Supplemental Provi–
sions) Act, 1961, should he amended so as to allow a
p~rty
(who has hcen refused leave to appeal by the
Ii
Igh Court from a decision of that Court on a case
stated hy a Justice of the District Court) to apply to the
Suprcme Court for lcave to appeal. (See paragraph 12.)
(2) There should he expressly conferred on the Sup–
~ellJe
Court jurisdiction to try in the first and final
~nstancc,
on consent of the parties, net constitutional
ISsues initiated in the High Court concerning the vali–
dty of Acts of the Oireachtas or issues arising under
Article 50, Section 1, of the Constitution for the reso–
lution of which no decision on any disputed question of
fact is required, or any other net issue of law of impor–
tance initiated in the High Court. (See paragraph 16.)
(3) The Suprellie Court should he given jurisdiction
to detenlline on a compulsory consultative case stated
to it by the District Court or the Circuit Court any
{'ollstitutional issU(', other than such issues as
ar~
reservcd for the High Court or the Supreme Court
u~der
Article 34.3.2 of the Constitution, which lllay he
raised ill the District Court (whether arising during the
pr('lilllinary examination of an indictable offence or
()lherwise) 'or in the Circuit Court. (See paragraph 23.)
(4)
If
at some future time proposals to amend the
Constitution are to he put to a referendum, consid–
eration should bc given to including among them one
to remove the present "one opinion" rule which applies
to decisions of the Supreme Court hy virtue of the
provisions of Article 26.2.2 and Article 34.4.5. (See
paragraph 24.)
(5) All judgments of the Supreme Court which are
delivered in written form should be published shortly
after delivery at the State's expense and copies made
aVailahle to the puhlic at a reasonahle cost. (Sec para–
graph 33.)
(6) There should be expressly conferred on the Sup–
teule Court power to refer hack to the High Court as a
SPecial issue the examination of new evidence arising on
a? appeal in the Supreme Court which the Supreme
C~)urt
requires to he so examined. Such issue should be
tried with or without a jury as the Supreme Court
should direct. (See paragraph 40.)
.(7) Rules of Court should require that, in an action
trl('d in the High Court with a jury for damages for
trongs, the questions put to the jury should be so
rallied as to ohtain the jury's verdict as to the parti–
eul~r
wrongful acts or omissions alleged on each side
~nd
as to the relevant ingredients of any damages
asessed. (See paragraph 41.)
. fR)
In addition to all the documents which, by virtue
flf
the existing rules, are required to he lodged in the
127
Supreme Court for the purpose of an appeal, an appel–
lant or cross-appellant should also lodge five copies of
an appeal hrief containing the following documents in
the Office of the Supreme Court and serve a copy of
the same upon the respondent not later than thirty
days before the appeal is due for hearing:
(a) A concise statement of facts.
(b) A concise statelllent setting out clearly and parti
cularly in what respects the judgment appealed from is
alleged to be erroneous. When the error alleged is in
respect of the admission or rejection of evidence, the
evidence admitted or rejected sha1I be stated in full.
When the error alleged is with respect to the charge of
the judge to the jury, ,the language of the judge and the
ohjection of counsel shall be set out verbatim.
If,
how–
ever, the references involved are lengthy their citation
alone will he sufficient if a transcript of the shorthand
writer's note of the lIIatter has been lodged with the
books of appeal and the provisions in question are
clearly identified by rderence to the page of the tran–
script and hy giving the opening and closing words of
each such provision as it appears in the transcript.
(c) A brief of the argument of the appellant setting
out the points of law or facts to he discussed with parti–
cular referencc to the page and line of the case of
the transcript and the authorities relied upon in support
of each point. A precise citation of the authority relied
upon should he given in each case together with the
nUlllber of the opening page of the authority and the
nUlllher of the page or pages containing any passage or
passages [('lied upon and the opening and closing words
of each such passage. When a constitutional provision,
statute, statutory order, statutory instrument, rule or
regulation or hye-Iaw is cited or relied on, so much
thereof as may be necessary to the decision of the case
shall be set
o~t
verba tim citing the volume and page
on which they lIIav he found in the official edition.
If
the provisions' invo'lved are lengthy their citation alone
as to volume and page shall be sufficient save in the case
of private statutes, hye-Iaws and other provisions which
are not of general puhlic application throughout the
State.
(d) A concise statcment stating the nature of the
order or relief sought including any special order with
regard to costs. (See paragraph 47.)
(9)
A hrief should also he filed, and served on the
appellant, by the respondent setting out in similar form
his sublllissions with regard to (a), (h), (c) and (d) above
in so far as he does not accept or agree with the appel–
lant's submissions or recital of the same. Where the
respondent is cross appealing he shall as relates to the
cross appeal fol1ow the mode prescribed for an appellant
and the appellant in reply to the cross appeal shall
follow the lIIode prescrihed for a respondent. (See para–
graph 47.)
(10)
A respondent's hrief and an appellant's replying
brief to a cross appeal (if any) should be filed and served
not later than fifteen days from the receipt of the appel-




