Previous Page  129 / 294 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 129 / 294 Next Page
Page Background

lant's brief or cross-appellant's brief. An appellant or

cross-appellant who does not file his brief within the

time stipulated may, on the motion of the other party,

have his appeal dismissed by the Court on the grounds

of undue delay. (See paragraph 47.)

(11) Not later than thirty days before a case stated is

due for hearing by the Supreme Court, the party having

carriage should lodge in the office of the Supreme Court

five copies of a case stated brief containing the material

already mentioned at recommendation (8) (c) in regard

to appeals and should serve a copy of the same upon

the respondent. A respondent's brief in similar form

should be filed and served not later than fifteen days

from the receipt of the brief of the party having carriage

of the case stated. (See paragraph 48.)

(12) The law should be changed so as to allow the

trial judge in a High Court action, who is of opinion

that in law certain issues ought not to be left to the

jurv, to leave questions on these issues to the jury with-

out being bound to accept the findings at which the

jury arrive on those questions. (Sec paragraph 50.)

(13) Each judge of the Supreme Court should be

provided with a salaried law clerk or research assistant.

(See paragraphs 51 and 52.)

The implementation of the above-mentioned recom-

mendations (1), (2), (3), (6) and (12) would require

legislation, while recommendations (7), (8), (9), (10), and

(11) could be dealt with by the Superior Courts Rules

Committee. Recommendation (4) would involve a refer-

endum to amend the Constitution. Recommendation

(5) would seem to involve merely a matter of adminis-

tration. Recommendation (13) is concerned with the

provision of additional court staff.

Note

—Although

this Report has only been printed

now, it was signed by the members of the Committee

two years ago, in March 1970.

Proposals for Secrets Act Reform

Proposals for reform of the Official Secrets Act of 1911,

and removal of Section 2—"a blot on the Statute

Book"—have been made to the Franks Committee re-

viewing the section, by Prof. H. W. P. Wade, Q.C.,

Professor of English Law at Oxford University.

The committee was set up after the unsuccessful

prosecution of

The Sunday

Telegraph,

Mr. Brian

Roberts, its Editor, Lt.-Col. Douglas Cairns, and Mr.

Jonathan Aitken, over the publication of a report on

the Nigerian war which was claimed to be confidential.

In his evidence to the committee, Prof. Wade says

that the new statute should define criminal offences

more narrowly, facilitate access to information about

government, and should be adopted only after adequate

public discussion and debate in Parliament.

"Wrong Form of Law"

Section 2 of the 1911 Act was a thoroughly wrong

form of law says Prof. Wade. "It hangs over the heads

of all concerned with public affairs, especially, of course,

the Press who are obliged to commit criminal offences

daily but are not normally victimised by prosecution.

"It prevents officials from letting out innocuous

and desirable information because they know that they

were acting criminally unless they obtain

a u t h o r i s a t i o n-

"It lowers the reputation of the public service since

it is thought to be used for covering up mistakes, even

when this is not true. It has aggravated the secretive-

ness for which British administration has a bad name

with its best-informed critics.

"It has become one of the vested interests of govern-

ment, a classic example of bad law creating bad prac-

tice."

In the recent

Sunday Telegraph

case, Mr. Justice

Caulfield virtually told the jury that the Act of 1911

might be regarded as obsolete. "This remarkable direc-

tion is a good indication of the standing of Section 2

in responsible legal opinion," says Prof. Wade.

(Daily Telegraph,

11 December 1971)

The Solicitors' Benevolent Association

The Association, which operates throughout the whole of Ireland, cares for Solicitors, their

wives, widows and families, who have fallen on hard times.

Last year over £4,300 was distributed in relief. Additional subscriptions, donations and bequests

are urgently needed to continue and extend the Association's work.

The active co-operation of the profession in the Association's good work is asked for, and all who

are not members are urged to join without delay.

Membership subscription £2.10 (or £2.05 if admitted less than 3 years) a year.

£15.75 life membership.

Address:

SECRETARY, Solicitors' Benevolent Association,

9 Upper Mount Street, Dublin 2.

128